A Comparative Perspective Sample Clauses

The "A Comparative Perspective" clause serves to provide an analysis or discussion of a subject by comparing it to similar practices, standards, or laws in other jurisdictions or contexts. In practice, this clause might outline how a particular legal principle, contractual term, or business practice differs or aligns with those found in other countries or industries, often referencing specific examples for clarity. Its core function is to offer broader context and insight, helping parties understand the relative advantages, disadvantages, or uniqueness of the approach being discussed, thereby informing better decision-making or interpretation.
A Comparative Perspective. London: Yale University Press ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇. 1988. When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations, Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.
A Comparative Perspective. Oxford: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Publishers. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2002). De veiligheidsutopie. Hedendaags onbehagen en verlangen rond misdaad en straf. Den ▇▇▇▇: Boom juridische uitgevers. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2010). Een vreemde in eigen land. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Askant. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2003). What’s wrong with the sociology of punishment? Theoretical criminology, 7(1), 5-28. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2005). For public social science. British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 345–53. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (1998). The Fine Art of Regulated Tolerance: Prostitution in Amsterdam. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2002). Criminologie en politiek. Tijdschrift voor criminologie, 4(1), 2-25. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, C. & ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2002). Vertrouwen en achterdocht: de driehoeksrelatie, justitie, media, publiek. Justitiële verkenningen, 28(6), 8-28. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, S & ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2003). Anti-social behaviour: local authority responsibility and the voice of the victim. Cambridge law journal, 62(2), 305-334. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2004). Anti-social behaviour, crime control and social control. The ▇▇▇▇▇▇ journal, 43(2), 203- 211. ▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇ de & ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2003, October 20). ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ van onveiligheid. Amsterdam: Diesrede Vrije Universiteit. ▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇ ▇▇ & ▇.▇.▇. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2005). Prevention of Organized Crime. A Situational Approach. Den ▇▇▇▇: Boom Juridische Uitgevers. Bunt H. van de & ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2007). Organizational Crime in The Netherlands. In: ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Eds.) Crime and Justice in the Netherlands. Volume 35. Chicago: Chicago University Press. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2005). 2004 American Sociological Association presidential address: for public sociology. British journal of sociology, 56(2), 259–94. Burgemeester en Wethouders Amsterdam (B&W) (1998). De bestuurlijke aanpak van de (georganiseerde) criminaliteit in Amsterdam. Gemeenteblad, 189, 1149-1150. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2009). Changing Society by Rebuilding Neighbourhoods: On the Effects of Restructurering Deprived Urban Areas. Experiences from the Netherlands. In:

Related to A Comparative Perspective

  • Historical Performance Information To the extent agreed upon by the parties, the Sub-Advisor will provide the Trust with historical performance information on similarly managed investment companies or for other accounts to be included in the Prospectus or for any other uses permitted by applicable law.

  • Metrics Institutional Metrics System-Wide Metrics

  • Adjusted EBITDA The 2019 adjusted EBITDA for the Affiliated Club Sellers shall total an aggregate of not less than $10,700,000.

  • Performance Metrics The Influencer shall aim for a minimum engagement rate of [SPECIFY PERCENTAGE, e.g., 3%] on all posts associated with the Campaign. Engagement rate is calculated as the sum of likes, comments, shares, and other interactions divided by the total number of followers at the time of posting. The Influencer agrees to achieve a minimum reach of [SPECIFY NUMBER] unique viewers per post, or a cumulative reach of [SPECIFY NUMBER] across the Campaign. Impressions data will be provided through the Influencer’s analytics tools and verified by the Company when requested. For posts incorporating a call-to-action, such as links to the Company’s website or landing page, the Influencer will target a CTR of at least [SPECIFY PERCENTAGE, e.g., 2%]. CTR is measured as the ratio of clicks to impressions, based on data from tracking links provided by the Company. The Influencer may be expected to drive specific actions (e.g., sales, sign-ups, downloads) using unique tracking codes or referral links. Specific conversion targets will be detailed between the Parties. The Influencer shall submit performance reports on a [WEEKLY/BI-WEEKLY/MONTHLY] basis. These reports must include detailed metrics for each published post, such as: number of likes, comments, shares, and other engagement interactions; reach and impressions per post; click-through data and referral link activity; and conversion data (if applicable). Within [NUMBER] days following the end of the Campaign, the Influencer shall provide a comprehensive post-campaign report summarizing overall performance against all agreed KPIs, including supporting documentation (e.g., screenshots, analytics dashboard exports). The Influencer agrees to provide access to analytics platforms or third-party verification tools to authenticate the reported data, if requested by the Company. The Parties agree to conduct a review of the performance metrics within the first [NUMBER] days of the Campaign to ensure the targets remain realistic and reflective of current market conditions. Adjustments may be made in writing if necessary. If the Influencer consistently fails to meet the established KPIs without valid justification, the Parties shall meet in good faith to discuss potential remedies, which may include adjustments to the compensation structure or additional promotional support, as mutually agreed upon. The Company may specify certain analytics tools or platforms for measuring and reporting performance metrics. The Influencer shall utilize these specified tools where applicable to ensure consistency and transparency in data reporting. In instances where independent verification of performance data is required, the Influencer agrees to cooperate with third-party verification services designated by the Company to validate the metrics reported.

  • Net Operating Income For any Real Estate and for a given period, an amount equal to the sum of (a) the rents, common area reimbursements, and service and other income for such Real Estate for such period received in the ordinary course of business from tenants or licensees in occupancy paying rent (excluding pre-paid rents and revenues and security deposits except to the extent applied in satisfaction of tenants’ or licensees’ obligations for rent and any non-recurring fees, charges or amounts including, without limitation, set-up fees and termination fees) minus (b) all expenses paid or accrued and related to the ownership, operation or maintenance of such Real Estate for such period, including, but not limited to, taxes, assessments and the like, insurance, utilities, payroll costs, maintenance, repair and landscaping expenses, marketing expenses, and general and administrative expenses (including an appropriate allocation for legal, accounting, advertising, marketing and other expenses incurred in connection with such Real Estate, but specifically excluding general overhead expenses of REIT and its Subsidiaries, any property management fees and non recurring charges), minus (c) the greater of (i) actual property management expenses of such Real Estate, or (ii) an amount equal to three percent (3.0%) of the gross revenues from such Real Estate excluding straight line leveling adjustments required under GAAP and amortization of intangibles pursuant to FAS 141R, minus (d) all rents, common area reimbursements and other income for such Real Estate received from tenants or licensees in default of payment or other material obligations under their lease, or with respect to leases as to which the tenant or licensee or any guarantor thereunder is subject to any bankruptcy, reorganization, arrangement, insolvency, readjustment of debt, dissolution, liquidation or similar debtor relief proceeding.