Action 1. 2.1 Action 1. 2.2 Actions should be prioritized as: - Essential - High - Medium - Low - Immediate: completed within the next year - Short: completed within the next 3 years - Medium: completed within the next 5 years - Long: completed within the next 10 years - Ongoing: currently being implemented and should continue - Completed: completed during preparation of the SSAP • Table 3 presents the results under each objective, followed by the actions grouped by results. Under each action, a list of countries (using ISO codes for short if many) where its implementation is relevant. • Against each action, the organisations responsible for its implementation are also listed, as concretely as possible. Result Action Priority Time scale Organisations responsible Mortality of chicks in breeding areas reduced by 20% • Actions to reduce clutch and chick mortality clarified and widely advertised to farmers / land-users, firstly in protected areas Applicable to: AU, HU, CZ, SK • Introduce system to manage grazing pressure in protected areas within tolerance limits of species (1,5 LU/ha) Applicable to: AU, HU, CZ, SK • Favourable habitat management in breeding areas supported through agri- environmental schemes. Applicable to: All countries with breeding populations • High • Medium • Low • Short • Medium • Medium Research institutes and governmental agencies developing agri-environmental measures Protected area managers Ministries of agriculture and environment • Breeding success monitored annually Applicable to: All countries with breeding populations • High • Short, then ongoing NGOs and research institutes, protected areas managers
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Draft Revised Format for Aewa Single Species Action Plans, Draft Revised Format for Aewa Single Species Action Plans