Administrator Evaluation Sample Clauses

Administrator Evaluation. Administrator Evaluation is a systematic continuous process to assess the professional performance of individual administrators. The process will assist the administrator with various administrative role responsibilities and facilitate decisions regarding tenure. The purpose of the evaluation is two-fold: 1. Evaluation for accountability insures the public’s interest in the welfare of their children. 2. To build on the foundation of skills that administrators already possess.

Administrator Evaluation. A. Administrators shall be fairly evaluated at least yearly by the Superintendent or his designee. B. No evaluation shall be prepared until after a conference between the administrator and his/her evaluator during which the proposed contents of the evaluation are discussed. C. The administrator shall be permitted to have an Association representative present in any evaluation interview upon his/her request. D. No evaluation or survey prepared by persons other than the administrator's evaluator shall become a part of the administrator's personnel file. E. The administrator may prepare a response to his/her evaluation which shall be incorporated therein and become a part of the evaluation. F. Identified inadequacies must be in writing with reasonable remedies and time lines for their achievement. G. Members receiving a satisfactory evaluation will receive $100 meritorious pay at the end of the school year.

Administrator Evaluation. The administration recognizes that satisfactory performance by a faculty member can be achieved in a variety of ways. 1) Management has the responsibility to observe and evaluate a faculty member's total performance of duties and responsibilities, as well as classroom teaching. Therefore, every contract faculty member shall be evaluated by the first-level manager or designee. 2) An administrator's evaluation of a faculty member shall include the following: a review of the self-evaluation of the faculty member; a classroom or clinical visitation; an observation of counseling sessions; an observation of librarians; the results of the student evaluation; the fulfillment of on-the-job responsibilities as indicated in Section 18.2.3 and evidence of effective working relationships with staff and students. 3) An administrator evaluation is part of the total evaluation process and shall cover the period of time since the last evaluation. Additional administrator evaluations may be conducted if the professional effectiveness of the faculty member is less than satisfactory.

Administrator Evaluation. A. Philosophy The Board and LASA agree that members of the administrative staff shall be subject to an evaluation process that is fair, constructive and reliable in order to facilitate the successful and continuing achievement of the goals and objectives of the Lansing School District Board of Education. B. Purpose The Board and LASA agree that the administrator evaluation process has several purposes including: 1. To establish, maintain and improve communication between supervisors and administrators, particularly in relation to an administrator's job performance. 2. To ensure that each administrator is aware of job responsibilities and related performance level expectations. 3. To recognize outstanding performance by individual administrators. 4. To maintain, strengthen and improve the level of performance of the administrative staff. 5. To identify and assist the correction of performance deficiencies by individual administrators. C. Evaluation Procedures 1. Upon employment, each administrator will be provided a written description of his/her job. Administrators will be informed of specific criterion upon which they will be evaluated by being provided a copy of the Performance Appraisal for LASA Administrators which has been mutually agreed to. 2. The content of any evaluation is not subject to the grievance procedure, however, non-adherence to procedures set forth in this Article by an evaluator shall be grievable. 3. Monitoring or observation of the work of an administrator shall be conducted openly and with knowledge of the administrator. 4. Administrators shall be evaluated every three years, or more often, if deemed necessary by the Board. Administrators selected shall be evaluated by March 30, and a written copy of the evaluation shall be given to the administrator. However, if an administrator is being put on an improvement plan through the evaluation process, the evaluation must be completed by February 1. The evaluator(s) shall hold a conference with the administrator for the purpose of clarifying the evaluation and recommendations. Such a conference shall be held within ten (10) days of submission of the written report to the administrator. An administrator who disagrees with the evaluation may submit written comments which shall be attached to the personnel file copy of the evaluation. 5. In the event that performance is unsatisfactory, a corrective action plan will be developed. Failure of an administrator to comply with the terms of a corre...

Administrator Evaluation. An administrator shall be given a copy of any written evaluation prepared by his/her evaluators. No such report shall be submitted to the Board, placed in the administrator’s file or otherwise acted upon without a prior conference with the administrator.

Administrator Evaluation. The administration recognizes that satisfactory performance by a faculty member can be achieved in a variety of ways: 1) Management has the responsibility to observe and evaluate a faculty member's total performance of duties and responsibilities, as well as classroom teaching. 2) The evaluation shall include the following: a review of the annual self-evaluation; a classroom, clinical, counseling, center, or library visitation/observation; the compilation of the student evaluations; the fulfillment of professional responsibilities as indicated in Section 18.2.3; and evidence of effective working relationships with staff and students. 3) Evaluation Performance: Contract Years One and Two a) The administrator evaluations are performed by the first-level manager or designee and one (1) additional manager appointed by the Chief Instructional Officer or Chief Student Services Officer as appropriate. Contract Years Three and Four b) The administrator evaluation is performed by the first-level manager or designee.

Administrator Evaluation. The administration recognizes that satisfactory performance by a faculty member can be achieved in a variety of ways: 1) Management has the responsibility to observe and evaluate a faculty member's total performance of duties and responsibilities, as well as classroom teaching. 2) The evaluation shall include the following: a review of the annual self-evaluation; a classroom, clinical, counseling, center, or library visitation/observation; the compilation of the student evaluations; the fulfillment of professional responsibilities as indicated in Section 18.2.3; and evidence of effective working relationships with staff and students. 3) Evaluation Performance: Contract Years One and Two

Administrator Evaluation. The administrator will be evaluated by a three-member committee composed of at least one Board member and one parent as appointed by the Board. The committee will use evaluative tools found in Appendix O to complete the evaluation. The committee will make a recommendation to the Board of whether or not to rehire the administrator. The evaluation period is from January through February.

Administrator Evaluation. A. An Administrator shall have the right to see his/her evaluation reports and shall receive a copy of all evaluation reports. B. An Administrator shall have the right, upon request, to review the contents of his/her personnel C. The Administrator shall have the right to submit a written answer to material derogatory to an Administrator’s conduct, service, character or personality. D. All personnel shall be evaluated in accordance with the law.