Alternative Evaluation Process Sample Clauses

The Alternative Evaluation Process clause establishes a method for assessing proposals or bids using criteria or procedures different from the standard evaluation process. Typically, this clause allows the contracting party to consider factors such as innovative solutions, value-added services, or unique qualifications that may not fit within the usual scoring system. Its core function is to provide flexibility in procurement or selection processes, ensuring that non-traditional or exceptional offerings can be fairly considered and potentially selected.
Alternative Evaluation Process. Permanent bargaining unit members who are on step 6 or higher of the salary schedule may participate in alternative evaluation. In the event the evaluator does not agree to the alternative evaluation cycle, the evaluator will provide, in writing, the reason(s) based on observed concerns aligned with the California Standards for the Teaching Profession, and the unit member will participate in the formal evaluation process. To participate in an alternative evaluation the teacher must have received a satisfactory evaluation in the previous cycle. The intent of the alternative evaluation shall be to allow the teacher to direct his or her own professional growth in one or more activities that relate to the California Teaching Standards as listed above. The teacher in collaboration with the evaluator will complete an alternative evaluation contract.
Alternative Evaluation Process. Permanent bargaining unit members who are on step 6 or higher of the salary schedule may participate in alternative evaluation. In the event the evaluator does not agree to the alternative evaluation cycle, the evaluator will provide, in writing, the reason(s) based on observed concerns aligned with the California Standards for the Teaching Profession, and the unit member will participate in the formal evaluation process. To participate in an alternative evaluation the teacher must have received a satisfactory evaluation in the previous cycle. The intent of the alternative evaluation shall be to allow the teacher to direct his or her own professional growth in one or more activities that relate to the California Teaching Standards as listed above. The teacher in collaboration with the evaluator will complete an alternative evaluation contract. Alternative Evaluations shall be completed by April 30 unless an extension is mutually agreed upon, but no later than June 1. If the teacher does not complete the alternative evaluation, the teacher will be placed on the formal evaluation cycle for the next school year as outlined in Article 10.2.
Alternative Evaluation Process. Permanent unit members who receive an overall rating of “Meets or Exceeds” on their most recent evaluation may request an alternative evaluation process. The evaluatee may submit an alternative evaluation plan for the evaluator’s approval. The plan shall focus on the unit member’s professional development in one or more of the criteria set forth in Section 3 on this article. Once approved by the evaluator and the District’s chief personnel official or designee, that plan, along with time lines included in the plan, shall become the evaluation procedure for that unit member.
Alternative Evaluation Process. 9.7.1 The alternative evaluation process is designed to increase opportunities for professional growth available to the District’s permanent certificated staff. It serves as an alternative to the traditional performance evaluation process to encourage accomplished teachers and staff to continue their professional development and personal growth. This evaluation process provides flexibility, permitting teachers and staff to grow in self-chosen areas of interest. 9.7.2 Participants will be permanent unit members who have consistently demonstrated competence in previous evaluations, and who wish to engage in a personalized program of professional growth. There will be no limitation on the number of participants at each site. The principal and unit member may determine a mutually agreeable alternative evaluation option. 9.7.3 Participating unit members will set meaningful goals that will serve as a focus for their professional growth, and establish suitable criteria for the evaluation of that growth. 9.7.4 At a conference held prior to the end of the sixth week of school, the unit member and the administrator will agree on these goals, the evaluation option, and the criteria for evaluation.
Alternative Evaluation Process 

Related to Alternative Evaluation Process

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not increase your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for the life of the contract, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIPS, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from the “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, with any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they may apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ at TIPS at ▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇ If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law clauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to read as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ at TIPS at ▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇@t ▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇