Anonymity Clause Samples

An Anonymity clause is designed to protect the identities of parties involved in an agreement or transaction by prohibiting the disclosure of names or identifying information. In practice, this clause may require that any reports, publications, or communications related to the agreement omit personal or organizational identifiers, and may set out procedures for handling data to ensure anonymity is maintained. The core function of this clause is to safeguard privacy and confidentiality, thereby reducing the risk of reputational harm or unwanted attention for the parties involved.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 25 times
Anonymity. Individuals who report abuse may or may not be entitled to anonymity. While CP&P allows anonymous child abuse reporting for the general public, school staff may not be entitled to anonymity for these reports. Furthermore, there is no anonymity when incidents are reported to law enforcement authorities.
Anonymity. Individuals who report abuse may or may not be entitled to anonymity. While DYFS allows anonymous child abuse reporting for the general public, school staff may not be entitled to anonymity for these reports. Furthermore, there is no anonymity when incidents are reported to law enforcement authorities.
Anonymity. LICENSEE shall have no right to use the names or other designation of THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO or the Inventors in connection with any sales or promotion of Product Units, Licensed services and Licensed Methods, as the case may be without the express written consent of the Institution or the Inventors, as the case may be.
Anonymity. The Donor acknowledges that unless the Donor requests anonymity, ▇▇▇▇ Community Foundation will publish Donor information publicly. Donor requests anonymity.
Anonymity. Assume that an adversary overhears on wireless packet and spoofs the identities, e,g., ▇▇▇▇▇ and connects to the NAN gateway, it does not send SMIDj as a plaintext but hide the identity in Q1 = ESTj [SMIDj , NID, T 1]. Moreover, it can be noticed from the proposed scheme that the pseudonymity of idSTj is being provided using α and β. Resultant, only the legitimate NAN gateway can learn the identity of meter by decrypting Q1 = ESTj [SMIDj , NID, T 1] using the secret token (STj). Thus, it achieves identity anonymity and protects from identity spoofing attack. In addition, the comparison on security services among [14], [17], [19]–[23] and the proposed scheme is given in Table II. We can notice that the proposed LAKA can provide more security services than previously proposed ones.
Anonymity. The school needs to collect identifiable information to facilitate the delivery of educational and support services, the job application process and fulfil other obligations and processes. However, some activities and interactions with the school may be done anonymously where practicable, which may include making an inquiry, complaint or providing feedback. How will the School use the personal information you provide?
Anonymity. Grant recipients will be advised of the Fund name when grants are issued from the Fund, unless indicated otherwise below. Additionally, to recognize and honor our Donors, The Community Foundation’s policy is to include Fund names in publicity about The Community Foundation unless Donors request to remain anonymous as indicated below. Please note that anonymity may always be requested in writing, on a grant- by-grant basis.
Anonymity. For paedophiles, before the advent of the Internet, sourcing children was risky and required a well planned strategy. Paedophiles had to make physical visits to places frequented by children, such as children’s playground, swimming pools, arcades, and school grounds. Paedophiles would also need to seek employment in jobs which provides the necessary contact with and exposure to children. The Internet has done away with these cumbersome measures. In their desire to contact children, paedophiles have taken advantage of the anonymity of the Internet to meet, entice, and exploit children and young people. A number of investigations have shown a significant number of young people that have been contacted by strangers on-line. Research by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ (2005) suggests that 31% of 9-to-19-year-olds who go on-line at least weekly, reported having received unwanted sexual comments via e-mail, chat, instant messenger or text message,116 whilst researchers ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2006) found age to be a discriminating factor, with 12-to-14-year- 115 Child sexual abuse, American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, available at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/cs/root/facts_for_families/child_sexual_abuse. See also ECPAT’s Child Pornography and Sexual Exploitation On-line, (2008) World Congress III against Sexual Exploitation of Children and Adolescents, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, November, available at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/worldcongressIII/PDF/Press_Release/ECPAT_WCIII_ENG.pdf 116 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, S and ▇▇▇▇▇, M., (2005) U.K. children go on-line: Final Report of Key Project Findings’, 2005 London: LSE Research On-line; available at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/399/ olds tending to talk to strangers on-line more than older teenagers.117 In his research, ▇▇▇▇▇ (2007) revealed that 32% of on-line teens have been contacted by someone with no connection to them or any of their friends. Nearly 23% say that they feel scared or uncomfortable as a result. Overall, 7% of the on-line teens experienced disturbing stranger contact.118 Although evidence indicates the increasing potential dangers of meeting strangers off-line who they first met on-line, there is still a high proportion of young people who do so.119 This suggests that there may be some lack of clarity about who is a friend, an acquaintance, or a stranger.120 In addition to anonymity of the Internet, paedophiles benefit greatly from interactive communication technologies such as Internet Relay Chats, on-line chat room...
Anonymity. Smart meters are supposed to transmit attributable fine grained data to the utility for the billing use-case. Nev- ertheless, the attributable fine grained data including device identity, energy usage, and so on, is vulnerable. For instance, an adversary can easily spoof/correlate the identities of smart meters that are reporting detailed fine grained information from the HAN to NAN. Thus, the identity of a meter should be kept private.
Anonymity. All pledges will remain anonymous and information relating to this program shall be handled in accordance with Government Data Practices Act M.S. 13.43, Subd 2.