Application Process/Eligibility Review Sample Clauses

Application Process/Eligibility Review. 1. Schedule and hold SRAP interviews with referred individuals, and include families or guardians (if applicable) in the process. X a. Obtain completed application materials and a criminal background check release. X b. Require SRAP applicants to submit the same documentation of legal identity, social security numbers, age, familial relationship, citizenship/eligible immigration status, disability, income, assets and deductions as Housing Choice Voucher applicants. X c. Review referrals to determine whether a live-in aide, shared housing, other reasonable accommodation has been requested. Ask individuals, parents/guardians, and/or support coordinators to complete a reasonable accommodation request per PHA policy and procedures. X d. Discuss and confirm living arrangements with individuals, parents/guardians and support coordinators (e.g., individual living alone in 1BR unit, individual living in shared housing with roommate(s), individual requesting a live-in aide). For TBRA, determine unit size for subsidy approval based on living arrangement. For PBRA, verify the individual’s household composition qualifies for the unit to which he/she was referred X based on the SRAP-PBRA subsidy standards. If the individual’s household composition does not qualify to rent this unit, notify the individual, support coordinator, parent/guardian and DBHDS that the household must be referred for a PBRA unit that is within the SRAP-PBRA subsidy standards. 2. Review and process SRAP applications in accordance with PHA’s Housing Choice Voucher program policies and procedures regarding income, citizenship/eligible immigration status, and social security number. Review and process SRAP applications in accordance with the uniform criminal exclusion criteria outlined in the SRAP Program Manual. Student status does not affect eligibility for SRAP. X
View Source

Related to Application Process/Eligibility Review

  • Program Eligibility The COUNTY shall provide eligibility determination for those persons applying for home repair under this Agreement by using the following factors: 1. The applicant is a resident of the CITY; and 2. The total income for all members of the applicant’s household does not exceed 80% of the median income of the Kansas City metropolitan area, as determined by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; and 3. The applicant is the homeowner and must have occupied the property as a primary residence for at least six (6) months; 4. The property to be repaired is within the corporate limits of the CITY; and 5. When required, medical need will be substantiated and documented.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Application Procedure 7.4.1. Application Priority........................................ 7.4.2. [Reserved].................................................. 7.4.3. Advance Payments............................................

  • Student Eligibility The LEA and POSTSECONDARY INSTITUTION shall qualify and advise candidates for dual credit from the pool of eligible high school students. A candidate for dual credit is eligible for consideration for fall, spring, and summer semesters if he or she: a. is enrolled during the fall and spring in a LEA in one-half or more of the minimum course requirements approved by PED for public school students under its jurisdiction or by being in physical attendance at a bureau of Indian education-funded high school at least three documented contact hours per day pursuant to 25 CFR 39.211(c); b. obtains permission from the LEA representative (in consultation with the student’s individualized education program team, as needed), the student’s parent or guardian if the student is under 18 years old, and POSTSECONDARY INSTITUTION representative prior to enrolling in a dual credit course; and c. meets POSTSECONDARY INSTITUTION requirements to enroll as a dual credit student.

  • Selection Procedure 10.2.4.1 Internal applicants shall be defined as all applicants with seniority in accordance with Article 12.5. 10.2.4.2 In filling a posted vacancy, first consideration shall be given to internal applicants who meet the stated qualifications. All Faculty members who meet the stated qualifications for the posted vacancy shall be interviewed by the Selection Committee. Past service and evaluations shall be considered by the Committee. The best qualified candidate shall be recommended for appointment to the position. 10.2.4.3 Where the qualifications of two or more of the applicants are relatively equal, the applicant with the greatest seniority shall be recommended for appointment to the position. 10.2.4.4 In establishing the qualifications, and in evaluating the qualifications and past performance of the applicants, the committee shall act in good faith, in a fair and reasonable manner, and shall not act in an arbitrary or discriminatory fashion. 10.2.4.5 Following the interviews, the committee will submit its recommendations containing a list of qualified candidates in order of preference, through the appropriate ▇▇▇▇ to the President or delegate. 10.2.4.6 New faculty members shall be appointed only when there are no qualified internal applicants. 10.2.4.7 If there are no qualified internal applicants, the selection committee may consider external applications, in accordance with the procedure outlined above. 10.2.4.8 Internal applicants will be advised as soon as possible of the selection committee's decision that the committee will be considering external applications in accordance with Article 10.2.4.7.