Approach to Work. To prepare an effective restoration plan in the manner required by law, the city built it on work already prepared as part of this SMP update. The city also reviewed work by others, and in some cases adopted ideas found in others’ work. First, the city reviewed the Inventory and Characterization Report (City of Long Beach, 2015) prepared as part of this SMP update. That report identified specific areas that may benefit from restoration. City staff either confirmed or revised the findings of that report regarding restoration opportunities, and included those they deemed viable in this plan. The city then reviewed the Community Visioning Study (City of Long Beach, 2015b) prepared as part of this SMP update. That report includes the public’s vision for a future Long Bach shoreline, as well as certain proposed goals and strategies that could implement such a vision. Some of the proposed strategies that resulted from the community visioning process are about restoration, and so are included in this plan. The city also reviewed the Draft Shoreline Designations (SED) Report (City of Long Beach, 2015c) prepared as part of this SMP update. That report includes proposed goals and strategies that could support the classification system and result in, among other things, shoreline environmental protection. Some of the proposed strategies of the SED report are about restoration, and so are included in this plan. Finally, the city also discussed restoration efforts on the Long Beach Peninsula with government staff and other professionals familiar with restoration on the Peninsula to identify existing projects and programs that might be relevant to Long Beach. (▇▇▇▇▇, et al, 2006, 2006b, 2006c)
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Sma Grant Agreement
Approach to Work. To prepare an effective restoration plan in the manner required by law, the city built build it on work already prepared as part of this SMP update. The city also reviewed work by others, and in some cases adopted ideas found in others’ work. First, the city reviewed the Inventory and Characterization Report (City of Long Beach, 2015) prepared as part of this SMP update. That report identified specific areas that may benefit from restoration. City staff either confirmed or revised the findings of that report regarding restoration opportunities, and included those they deemed viable in this plan. The city then reviewed the Community Visioning Study (City of Long Beach, 2015b) prepared as part of this SMP update. That report includes the public’s vision for a future Long Bach shoreline, as well as certain proposed goals and strategies that could implement such a vision. Some of the proposed strategies that resulted from the community visioning process are about restoration, and so are included in on this plan. The city also reviewed the Draft Shoreline Designations (SED) Report (City of Long Beach, 2015c) prepared as part of this SMP update. That report includes proposed goals and strategies that could support the classification system and result in, among other things, shoreline environmental protection. Some of the proposed strategies of the SED report are about restoration, and so are included in on this plan. Finally, the city also discussed restoration efforts on the Long Beach Peninsula with government staff and other professionals familiar with restoration on the Peninsula to identify existing projects and programs that might be relevant to Long Beach. (▇▇▇▇▇, et al, 2006, 2006b, 2006c)
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Sma Grant Agreement