Assessment of Requested Relocation Clause Samples

The 'Assessment of Requested Relocation' clause defines the process by which a party evaluates a request to move a person, asset, or operation from one location to another. Typically, this clause outlines the criteria and procedures for reviewing such requests, such as considering the reasons for relocation, the impact on operations, and any associated costs or approvals required. Its core function is to ensure that relocation requests are handled systematically and fairly, preventing arbitrary decisions and minimizing disruption or risk to the parties involved.
Assessment of Requested Relocation. (a) The Operator must, as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event not later than 40 Working Days after receiving a notice under clause 14.1, assess as a Reasonable and Prudent Person whether the Requested Relocation is an Authorised Relocation having regard to, among other things, the order, relative to its receipt of equivalent notices received from other shippers, in which the Shipper's Requested Relocation was received, (but for the avoidance of doubt the Parties intend this priority to apply only to the extent that requested relocations compete or conflict with each other for utilisation of capacity). (b) For the purposes of clause 14.2(a), a Requested Relocation of Contracted Capacity is not an Authorised Relocation if: (i) the Requested Relocation would cause the sum (after the relocation) of all shippers': (A) quantities referred to as Contracted Capacity for that Inlet Point across all of shippers' Capacity Services at the New Inlet Point to exceed the New Inlet Point's Total Current Physical Capacity or to exceed the safe operating capability of the part of the DBNGP at which the New Inlet Point is located; or (B) quantities referred to as Contracted Capacity for that Outlet Point across all shippers' Capacity Services at the New Outlet Point to exceed the New Outlet Point's Total Current Physical Capacity or to exceed the safe operating capability of the part of the DBNGP at which the New Outlet Point is located; (ii) in the opinion of the Operator, as a Reasonable and Prudent Person, the Requested Relocation would not be Operationally Feasible, and for the avoidance of doubt an increase in compressor fuel costs does not mean the Requested Relocation is not Operationally Feasible; or (iii) the Requested Relocation is such that an Inlet Point at which there is Contracted Capacity under this Contract would be downstream of an Outlet Point at which there is Contracted Capacity under this Contract. (c) For the purposes of clause 14.2(a), unless clause 14.2(b) provides that it is not an Authorised Relocation, a Requested Relocation of Contracted Capacity to a New Inlet Point is an Authorised Relocation under the Contract if: (i) the Requested Relocation would result in the New Inlet Point being downstream of the Existing Inlet Points; (ii) the Requested Relocation would not cause the sum (after the relocation) of all shippers' quantities referred to as Contracted Capacity for that Inlet Point across all of shippers' Capacity Services) at the N...
View SourceView Similar (12)

Related to Assessment of Requested Relocation

  • HHS Single Audit Unit will notify Grantee to complete the Single Audit Determination Form If Grantee fails to complete the form within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of notice, Grantee maybe subject to sanctions and remedies for non-compliance.

  • Termination for Refusing Access to Public Records In accordance with section 287.058, F.S., the Department may unilaterally terminate the Term Contract for refusal by the Contractor to allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material made or received by the Contractor in conjunction with the Term Contract, unless the records are exempt from s. 24(a) of Art. I of the State Constitution and section 119.071(1), F.S.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) (eff. Apr. 1, 2025, Section 544.0106, pursuant to House Bill 4611, Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S.) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.