Assessment Result – Mitigated Scenario Clause Samples

Assessment Result – Mitigated Scenario. 5.5.6.1 With the implementation of the abovementioned mitigation measures, the maximum mitigated 1-hour (Tier 1), 24-hour (Tier 1) and annual cumulative TSP concentrations at each representative ASRs have been assessed and are presented in Table 5.9 and Table 5.10 below. In general, it is predicted that, with the recommended mitigation measures adopted, the TSP concentrations at all ASRs would comply with their respective criteria. 1. 5m 5m 10m 1.5m 5m 10m 1. 5m 5m 10m 1.5m 5m 10m 1. 5m 5m 10m 1.5m 5m 10m Table 5.10 Predicted Cumulative Mitigated Annual TSP Concentrations at ASRs (including background concentration) 1. 5m 5m 10m 1. 5m 5m 10m A13 Lohas Park (Planned Development in Area 86, Package 5; Stage 1) 78.6 76.3 74.5 A14 Lohas Park (Planned Development in Area 86, Package 5; Stage 1) 77.0 75.7 74.3 A15 Lohas Park Stage 3 (Planned Development in Area 86,Package 11) 79.3 75.9 74.4 A16 Lohas Park Stage 3 (Planned Development in Area 86,Package 11) 78.1 76.1 74.5 A17 Lohas Park Stage 3 (Planned Development in Area 86,Package 11) 76.4 75.2 74.3 A18 Lohas Park Stage 3 (Planned Development in Area 86,Package 10) 76.0 75.2 74.3 A19 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Group of Hospitals Aided Primary School & Secondary School 76.9 75.5 74.0 A20 Planned Primary and Secondary Schools 75.1 74.9 74.2 A21 The Beaumount (Under Construction) 73.3 73.3 73.3 A22 RTHK Broadcasting House (Planned) 74.2 73.9 73.5 A23 Data Centre (Planned) 73.7 73.6 73.4 Notes: [1] Not considered as an ASR during construction phase as it is assumed that the site is under construction to account for cumulative impact. 5.5.6.2 It can also be seen from Table 5.9 and Table 5.10 that the predicted 1-hour, 24-hour and annual TSP concentrations would in general decrease with increasing elevations from ground level to 10m above ground. In respect of potential construction dust impact to the nearest ASRs in TKO Area 86 (i.e. ASR A1-A2, A6, A11-A18 and A20), the air sensitive uses as well as the fresh air intake are generally located at least 5m above ground. Fugitive dust impact generated from the construction of the at-grade section of this Project on ground level would not have significant dust impact on the ASRs at high elevation. As shown in Table 5.9 and Table 5.10, the TSP concentrations at ASR A1-A2, A6, A11-A18 and A20 at 5m and 10m above ground are far below their respective criteria.

Related to Assessment Result – Mitigated Scenario

  • Positive Test Results In the event an employee tests positive for drug use, the employee will be provided, in writing, notice of their right to explain the test results. The employee may indicate any relevant circumstance, including over the counter or prescription medication taken within the last thirty (30) days, or any other information relevant to the reliability of, or explanation for, a positive test result.

  • Reasonable Suspicion Testing All Employees Performing Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Reasonable suspicion testing for alcohol or controlled substances may be directed by the Employer for any employee performing safety-sensitive functions when there is reason to suspect that alcohol or controlled substance use may be adversely affecting the employee’s job performance or that the employee may present a danger to the physical safety of the employee or another. B. Specific objective grounds must be stated in writing that support the reasonable suspicion. Examples of specific objective grounds include but are not limited to: 1. Physical symptoms consistent with alcohol and/or controlled substance use; 2. Evidence or observation of alcohol or controlled substance use, possession, sale, or delivery; or 3. The occurrence of an accident(s) where a trained manager, supervisor or lead worker suspects alcohol or other controlled substance use may have been a factor.

  • Graduated Return to Work Where an Employee is not receiving benefits from another source and is working less than his/her regular working hours in the course of a graduated return-to-work as the Employee recovers from an illness or injury, the Employee may use any unused sick/short term disability allocation remaining, if any, for the portion of the day where the Employee is unable to work due to illness or injury. A partial sick/short term leave day will be deducted for an absence of a partial day in the same proportion as the duration of the absence is to an employee’s regular hours. Where an employee returns on a graduated return to work from a WSIB/LTD claim, and is working less than his/her regular hours, WSIB and LTD will be used to top up the employee’s wages, as approved and if applicable. Where an employee returns on a graduated return to work from an illness which commenced in the previous fiscal year, • and is not receiving benefits from another source; • and is working less than his/her regular hours of work; • and has sick leave days and/or short-term disability days remaining from the previous year The employee can access those remaining days to top up their wages proportional to the hours not worked. Where an employee returns on a graduated return to work from an illness which commenced in the previous fiscal year, • and is not receiving benefits from another source, • and is working less than his/her regular hours of work, • and has no sick leave days and/ or short-term disability days remaining from the previous year, the employee will receive 11 days of sick leave paid at 100% of the new reduced working hours. When the employee’s hours of work increase during the graduated return to work, the employee’s sick leave will be adjusted in accordance with the new schedule. In accordance with paragraph c), the Employee will also be allocated one hundred and twenty (120) short-term disability days payable at ninety percent (90%) of regular salary proportional to the hours scheduled to work under the graduated return to work. The new pro-rated sick/short-term leave allocation may not be used to top-up from part-time to full-time hours.

  • Litigation History There shall be no consistent history of court/arbitral award decisions against the Tenderer, in the last (Specify years). All parties to the contract shall furnish the information in the appropriate form about any litigation or arbitration resulting from contracts completed or ongoing under its execution over the year’s specified. A consistent history of awards against the Tenderer or any member of a JV may result in rejection of the tender.

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 During the intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will also be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.13 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met (qualitative and quantitative) and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI; 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale described in 6.9 below shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.