Assessment Methodology Sample Clauses
The Assessment Methodology clause defines the procedures and criteria used to evaluate performance, compliance, or deliverables under an agreement. It typically outlines the specific metrics, benchmarks, or processes that will be used to measure whether obligations are being met, such as periodic reviews, testing protocols, or third-party assessments. By clearly establishing how assessments will be conducted, this clause ensures transparency and consistency, reducing the risk of disputes over performance or quality.
Assessment Methodology. Prior to undertaking the initial inspection you are required to complete the Manufacturer’s section of the Check list for the initial inspection or monitoring of the factory production control according to the applicable standard and submit supporting evidence. TÜV UK will undertake an Initial Inspection of the Factory and Factory Production Control System and undertake Continuous surveillance of the FPC system in accordance with the requirements of the applicable standard.
Assessment Methodology. This compliance assessment involved activities before, during, and following the onsite visit by the monitoring team and the Parties. The team consists of ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. Ray, ▇.▇▇., Monitor; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, MD, Psychiatrist; and, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, MD, Correctional Medicine. Pre-visit activities ensured involvement and input from officials and legal counsel representing the Territory (defendant) and the United States (plaintiff) in the planning of the site visit. Pre- visit activities included conference calls and exchange of relevant documents intended to maximize clarity and mutual understanding for baseline assessment visit purposes and scheduling, and monitoring expectations in general. Pursuant to Section X.D.1 of the 2013 Settlement Agreement, the Monitor provided the following information to the Territory and Department of Justice officials for review and comment. This information intended to provide to the Parties: 1) the description of how compliance with the Agreement will be assessed; 2) how information necessary for on and off site assessment work will be gathered; and, 3) what information the Monitor will require the defendants to routinely report and with what frequency.
Assessment Methodology. The SPA methodology herein is based on the standard CMS methodology and is described in the Framework for Independent Assessment of Security and Privacy Controls. The Auditor must prepare and Web-broker must submit a Security Privacy Controls Assessment Test Plan (SAP) that describes the Auditor’s scope and methodology of the assessment. Web-broker must submit the Auditor-prepared SAP at least thirty (30) Days prior to commencing the assessment. The assessment methods may include examination of documentation, logs, and configurations; interviews of personnel; and/or testing of technical controls. The SPA must provide an accurate depiction of the security and privacy controls in place, as well as potential security and privacy risks, by identifying the following:
a. Application or system vulnerabilities, the associated business and system risks and potential impact;
b. Weaknesses in the configuration management process such as weak system configuration settings that may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system;
c. Web-broker security and privacy policies and procedures; and
d. Major documentation omissions and/or discrepancies. 9 This document is located on CMS zONE at the following link: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/document/privacy-and- security-audit. 9F
Assessment Methodology. 12.2.1 This heritage impact assessment follows the criteria and guidelines stipulated in Annexes 10 and 19 of the TM on EIA Process together with the other guidelines and requirements discussed above. This assessment focuses on the potential impact on the cultural and historical heritage of proposed development in the vicinity of SEKD.
12.2.2 A comprehensive marine archaeological review was carried out to determine the archaeological potential of the study area. This included examination of AMO records and archaeological and historical academic publications.
12.2.3 All archives holding information on shipwrecks in Hong Kong waters were explored for relevant data.
Assessment Methodology. 5.1 – Global Performance - Objective: Eligible (Green) • 1001 AM - kits /third parties • 1002 CPM • 1003 P6 • 1004 P4 and P5 • 1005 MOGI-MIRIM
a) Logistics:
Assessment Methodology. The SPA assessment methodology described herein is based on the standard CMS methodology used in the assessment of all CMS internal and business partner information systems. The Non-Exchange Entity shall prepare an assessment plan to evaluate any system vulnerabilities. The assessment methods may include examination of documentation, logs, and configurations; interviews of personnel; and/or testing of technical controls. The SPA assessment shall provide an accurate depiction of the security and privacy controls in place, as well as potential security and privacy risks, by identifying the following: a. Application or system vulnerabilities, the associated business and system risks and potential impact; b. Weaknesses in the configuration management process such as weak system configuration settings that may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system; c. Non-Exchange Entity security and privacy policies and procedures; and d. Major documentation omissions and/or discrepancies.
Assessment Methodology. 4.6.2.1 The likely types and sequences of construction activities that may give rise to potential dust impacts are identified based on the construction programmes and the work area locations. The Fugitive Dust Model (FDM) is used to predict the likely impacts from the dust generating activities upon the identified ASRs.
4.6.2.2 The particulate emission rates are estimated using the Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42), USEPA, 5th edition, 1995. The emission factors used in the modelling are tabulated in Table 4.9.
Assessment Methodology. Credits and debits will be assessed using [identify the method for determining credits, and debits, e.g., specific functional assessment methodology, wetland acreage, or other appropriate method].
Assessment Methodology. Prior to undertaking the initial inspection you are required to complete the Manufacturer’s section of the Check list for the initial inspection or monitoring of the factory production control according to the applicable standard and submit supporting evidence. TÜV UK will undertake an Initial Inspection of the Factory and Factory Production Control System and/or products regarding BS EN 14351-1, BS EN 14351-2, BS EN 16034 or BS EN 13241 and undertake Continuous surveillance of the FPC system and/or products regarding BS EN 14351-1, BS EN 14351-2, BS EN 16034 or BS EN 13241 in accordance with the requirements of the applicable standard.
Assessment Methodology. 336 2. 1. 1 Victorian Alps Bioregion ............................................................................... 336 2.2 ECOLOGICAL VEGETATION CLASS (EVC) 336