Benchmarking of QNA and ▇▇▇ Clause Samples

Benchmarking of QNA and ▇▇▇. In Polish national accounts for certain variables the annual estimates are simply the sum of the quarterly figures, for example: exports, imports, changes in inventories. In this case there is no need to benchmark annual data. But in many cases, especially for those variables for which no quarterly data have been collected, there are annual surveys which influence quarterly estimates done before these surveys. In Polish practice of alignment quarterly and annual figures manual approach is used. For each quarter of the year the ratio of the annual to the sum of the quarterly data is calculated. These ratios are then applied to the original quarterly series. To achieve balanced accounts the discrepancies appeared in cross - section dimension after applying above ratios are balance “by eye” with the use of expertise, intuition of compilers. They have wide perspective on the national accounts and have the knowledge how the economy is behaving. First estimates of the year, which is the sum of four quarters is revised twice, i.e. in t+1 year and t+2 year. It influences quarterly data. A table below contains two versions of quarterly data in 2006: first estimates and after first revision of annual data – revised manually and with use of Ecotrim. Items First estimates Revised manually Revised with Ecotrim GDP 105,5 106,0 106,3 106,6 105,4 106,3 106,6 106,6 104,0 105,7 106,3 108,5 Private consumption exp. 105,3 104,7 105,5 105,0 105,0 104,4 105,2 104,7 104,7 104,3 105,1 105,3 Public consumption expen d1.06,6 103,4 103,0 102,6 108,6 105,3 104,9 104,5 106,6 104,9 105,1 106,6 Gross fixed capital formati o1n07,6 114,5 119,3 119,3 109,0 115,9 118,0 116,6 104,9 113,1 118,2 119,5 Inventories 81,4 -89,8 57,5 146,9 84,8 92,1 114,8 349,7 94,9 96,6 127,2 284,7 Exports 121,7 112,5 114,5 110,6 122,4 112,8 114,6 110,1 121,0 112,4 114,6 111,7 Imports 121,3 110,7 115,9 116,0 123,7 112,7 116,6 117,5 123,4 112,5 117,8 116,8 In the third column, there are growth rates calculated on the basis of data computed by Ecotrim. These data were compiled in the following way: 1. In the first step new annual data at constant prices of previous year were disaggregated with related series (first estimates of quarterly data). AR(1) procedure was applied. These new time series (preliminary time series) fulfill temporal aggregation constraints. 2. In the second step multivariate method was used. Preliminary time series were disaggregated to fulfill not only temporal but also contemporaneous constrai...

Related to Benchmarking of QNA and ▇▇▇

  • Public Posting of Approved Users’ Research Use Statement The PI agrees that information about themselves and the approved research use will be posted publicly on the dbGaP website. The information includes the PI’s name and Requester, project name, Research Use Statement, and a Non-Technical Summary of the Research Use Statement. In addition, and if applicable, this information may include the Cloud Computing Use Statement and name of the CSP or PCS. Citations of publications resulting from the use of controlled-access datasets obtained through this DAR may also be posted on the dbGaP website.

  • Benchmarking The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.

  • Protocol The attached Protocol shall be an integral part of this Agreement.

  • Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By February 1, 2017, the Division will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly-added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the Division to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the Division, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternatives are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the Division online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the Division will officially adopt and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.

  • Scheduling of Work Subcontractor shall provide Contractor with scheduling information and a proposed schedule for performance of the Subcontract Work consistent with the Progress Schedule and in a form acceptable to Contractor. Subcontractor shall comply with the Progress Schedule including, but not specifically limited to, commencement, duration, and sequencing of activities. Contractor shall reasonably cooperate with the Subcontractor in scheduling the Subcontract Work and shall attempt, as reasonably possible, to avoid conflicts or interference with the Subcontract Work.