Collision Analysis Clause Samples

Collision Analysis. Collision data from the Caltrans District 4 Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis System (TASAS) was compiled for the I-680 corridor from PM R8.120 in Alameda County to PM R2.870 in Contra Costa County. Collision information is provided for the most recent three years of complete data: January 2017 through December 2019. Table 4-3 summarizes the TASAS collision data as it relates to the statewide averages for similar facilities. Collision rates are expressed as accidents per million vehicle miles traveled.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Collision Analysis. The CONSULTANT shall obtain the collision reports via the DEPARTMENT’S Crash Analysis Reporting system (CARs) and any available collision database approved by the DEPARTMENT. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a collision summary and collision diagram for the intersection under study. The summary and diagram shall depict as a minimum the most recent 36 months for which data is available. Collision diagrams shall be drawn on standard DEPARTMENT forms contained in the MUTS or on other DEPARTMENT approved forms. Collision diagrams may be drawn on aerials. A collision analysis shall be performed based on the prepared collision summary and diagram. • Collision summary • Collision diagram • Collision analysis
View SourceView Similar (2)
Collision Analysis. Traffic collision data for the SR-91 freeway and interchange ramps within the project study limits were obtained from Caltrans Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis Systems (TASAS) Table B and TASAS Selective Accident Retrieval (TSAR) for a 3-year period between July 1, 2013 and June 30, 2016.
View Source
Collision Analysis. The District 3 Office of Traffic Safety and Investigations provided the following collision history and analysis for a five-year period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019 from the Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis System (TASAS). The Tables below (TASAS Table B Collision Rates (01/01/2015 - 12/31/2019) summarize and compare the actual collision rates for the segment of the highway to the average rates for similar facilities throughout the State. The Total collision rates include all reported collisions: Fatal, Injury, and Property Damage. The Transportation Analysis Report (TAR, Section 7.3 Roadway Safety) States Alternatives 2A through 5A, and 2B would reduce congestion compared to Alternative 1 (no build). Reducing congestion and increasing the average speed to or near the free-flow speed would reduce congestion-related collision types, such as the most common type in the project area, rear end collision. TAR Alternatives 2 through 6, 8, and 9 (as compared to PA&ED Alternatives 2A through 6A, and 2B) would be expected to lower the collision rate since these alternatives add a lane in most of the study area. Traffic congestion under the preferred alternative would affect trucks similarly to passenger vehicles in the general purpose lanes; therefore, reduced travel times for the preferred alternative would perform well for both vehicles and trucks to reduce collisions.1
View Source
Collision Analysis. The accident data analyzed on the mainline were from the period of June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2020. County- Route Post Mile Total Collisions Fatal Fatal + Injury Actual Average (F) (F+I) (F) (F+I) Total (F) (F+I) Total Yolo-50 0.0/2.5 292 4 97 0.013 0.41 0.98 0.003 0.26 0.82 Yolo-80 4.3/11.4 722 3 249 0.003 0.23 0.68 0.006 0.22 0.65 There was a total of 292 accidents on Yol-50 from PM 0.0 to 2.5, with 4 fatal and 119 injury accidents. The collision data indicate that primary collision factors are related to motorist’s driving behaviors with 60% due to speeding and 13% due to improper turns by vehicles. The type of collisions includes 59% rear end, 19% sideswipe, 16% hitting objects, and 2% broadside. There was a total of 722 accidents on Yol-80 from PM 4.3 to 11.4, with 3 fatal and 246 injury accidents. The collision data indicate that primary collision factors are related to motorist’s driving behaviors with 54% due to speeding and 14% due to improper turns by vehicles. The type of collisions includes 57% rear end, 26% sideswipe, and 14% hitting objects. The actual collision rates for both routes are slightly higher than the statewide average rates but are not considered statistically significant. The majority of the collisions on I-80 and US 50 occurred during the morning and afternoon commute times, which indicates congestion related collision pattern. This project will rehabilitate existing pavement and may address non-congestion related accidents by providing a smoother and more rideable pavement, replacing existing open grade asphalts, upgrading guardrails and replacing traffic signs and stripes.
View Source
Collision Analysis. The CONSULTANT shall obtain the collision reports via the DEPARTMENT’S Crash Analysis Reporting system (CARs) and any available collision database approved by the DEPARTMENT. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a collision summary and collision diagram for the intersection under study. The summary and diagram shall depict as a minimum the most recent 36 months for which data is available. Collision diagrams shall be drawn on standard DEPARTMENT forms contained in the MUTS or on other DEPARTMENT approved forms. Collision diagrams may be drawn on aerials. A collision analysis shall be performed based on the prepared collision summary and diagram. • Collision summary • Collision diagram • Collision analysis The composite study is designed to supplement Study Types I, II, and III as needed and to enable the DTOE or the PM to utilize the services of the CONSULTANT in solving a variety of traffic problems. This study requires the DTOE or the PM and the CONSULTANT to develop the study package for a particular traffic problem by selecting appropriate tasks defined herein. This study is designed to be flexible; therefore each task shall be priced individually. Any combination of tasks may be selected for a particular composite study or as a supplement to Study Types I, II, and III. Payment for each composite study will be the summation of the individual prices for selected tasks. The time period allowed for completion of a composite study shall be based on the types of tasks to be performed. The normal period allowed for other types of studies in this contract should be used as a general guide in determining the period of performance for a particular composite study. The PM and the CONSULTANT will determine a mutually acceptable performance period and due date. This section specifies the work tasks which may be performed by the CONSULTANT for a particular composite study; the responsibilities of the CONSULTANT and the DEPARTMENT, and the work task products to be developed by the CONSULTANT and delivered to the DEPARTMENT. An 8-Hour TMC shall be taken for those hours encompassing the morning, midday peak and afternoon traffic periods and/or peak periods during which warranting volumes exist and an off-peak period. Each period shall normally consist of the eight (8) consecutive 15-minute intervals (2 hours) during each period which yields the highest total volume of vehicles entering the intersection. Note that the 2-hour period could begin on any quarter hour. For example,...
View Source
Collision Analysis. Activity 3 requires students to use the Law of Conservation of Momentum to solve for specific variables. Activity 4 introduces the concept of impulse and involves two demonstrations.
View Source
Collision Analysis. Consultant shall perform collision analysis using information obtained in Tech Memos 1, 2 and 3. Analysis must include collision patterns, high-frequency collision locations, severe collision locations, evaluation of causes, and potential countermeasures.
View Source

Related to Collision Analysis

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Escrow Analysis If applicable, with respect to each Mortgage Loan, the Seller has within the last twelve months (unless such Mortgage was originated within such twelve month period) analyzed the required Escrow Payments for each Mortgage and adjusted the amount of such payments so that, assuming all required payments are timely made, any deficiency will be eliminated on or before the first anniversary of such analysis, or any overage will be refunded to the Mortgagor, in accordance with RESPA and any other applicable law;

  • Independent Analysis Each Party hereby confirms that its decision to execute this Agreement has been based upon its independent assessment of documents and information available to it, as it has deemed appropriate.

  • Sampling and Analysis The sampling and analysis of the coal delivered hereunder shall be performed by Buyer upon delivery of the coal to Buyer’s facility, and the results thereof shall be accepted and used as defining the quality and characteristics of the coal delivered under this Agreement and as the Payment Analysis. All analyses shall be made in Buyer’s laboratory at Buyer’s expense in accordance with ASTM standards where applicable, or industry-accepted standards in other cases. Samples for analyses shall be taken in accordance with ASTM standards or other methods mutually acceptable to both parties. Seller shall transmit its “as loaded” quality analysis to Buyer as soon as possible. Seller’s “as-loaded” quality shall be the Payment Analysis only when Buyer’s sampler and/or scales are inoperable, or if Buyer fails to obtain a sample upon unloading. Seller represents that it is familiar with Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices, and that it finds them to be acceptable. Buyer shall notify Seller in writing of any significant changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices. Any such changes in Buyer’s sampling and analysis practices shall, except for ASTM or industry-accepted changes in practices, provide for no less accuracy than the sampling and analysis practices existing at the tune of the execution of this Agreement, unless the Parties otherwise mutually agree. Each sample taken by Buyer shall be divided into four (4) parts and put into airtight containers, properly labeled and sealed. One (1) part shall be used for analysis by Buyer. One (1) part shall be used by Buyer as a check sample, if Buyer in its sole judgment determines it is necessary. One (1) part shall be retained by Buyer until thirty (30) days after the sample is taken (“Disposal Date”), and shall be delivered to Seller for analysis if Seller so requests before the Disposal Date. One (1) part (the “Referee Sample”) shall be retained by Buyer until the Disposal Date. Seller shall be given copies of all analyses made by Buyer by the fifth (5th) business day of the month following the month of unloading. In addition, Buyer shall send Seller weekly analyses of coal unloaded at Buyer’s facilities. Seller, on reasonable notice to Buyer, shall have the right to have a representative present to observe the sampling and analyses performed by Buyer. Unless Seller requests an analysis of the Referee Sample before the Disposal Date, Buyer’s analysis shall be used to determine the quality of the coal delivered hereunder and shall be the Payment Analysis. The Monthly Weighted Averages of specifications referenced in §6.1 shall be based on the individual Shipment analyses. If any dispute arises with regard to the analysis of any sample before the Disposal Date for such sample, the Referee Sample retained by Buyer shall be submitted for analysis to an independent commercial testing laboratory (“Independent Lab”) mutually chosen by Buyer and Seller. For each coal quality specification in question, if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards, the Independent Lab results will govern, and the prior analysis shall be disregarded. All testing of the Referee Sample by the Independent Lab shall be at requestor’s expense unless the Independent Lab results differ from the original Payment Analysis for any specification by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards as to that specification. In such case, the cost of the analysis made by the Independent Lab shall be borne by the party who provided the original Payment Analysis.

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”