Composition of Panel and Conduct of Hearing Clause Samples

Composition of Panel and Conduct of Hearing. AAUP and Administration representatives may act as observers or participants at suspension and dismissal hearings in front of the Grievance Panel. 9.3.6.1 At a full hearing before a Grievance Panel the charges shall be presented by a representative of the Administration, who may be an attorney. The Faculty Member may also have a representative, who may be an attorney. The hearing, however, is not considered a court of law, and formal rules of evidence do not apply. 9.3.6.2 The burden of proof that adequate cause exists rests with the University and will be satisfied in dismissal cases only by clear and convincing 9.3.6.3 The Grievance Panel shall consist of five (5) members of the Grievance Committee selected as described in Article 8. 5.1. In cases involving dismissal, all persons serving on the Grievance Panel must hold faculty titles. 9.3.6.4 Other than the parties or their representatives, there shall be a separation of witnesses so that only one witness at a time may be present in the hearing room. 9.3.6.5 The Administration and/or its representative and the Faculty Member and/or his/her representative may make opening statements. 9.3.6.6 The Administration shall proceed first. After each Administration witness testifies, the Faculty Member and/or his/her representative may question the witness. The Administration and the Faculty Member and/or their representatives may subsequently alternate with follow-up questions. 9.3.6.7 Upon completion of the Administration's presentation, the Faculty Member may proceed. After each Faculty Member's witness testifies, the Administration and/or its representative may question the witness. The Faculty Member and/or his/her representative and the Administration may subsequently alternate with follow-up questions. 9.3.6.8 Participants shall confine their presentations to facts relevant to the charges. The Panel chairperson is authorized to determine whether a particular fact is relevant to the charges. 9.3.6.9 The Administration and the Faculty Member may present only that rebuttal evidence which has direct bearing on previously submitted evidence. 9.3.6.10 The Administration and/or its representative and the Faculty Member and/or his/her representative may make closing statements. 9.3.6.11 The Grievance Panel may use its discretion in setting procedures for conduct of the hearing, such as reasonable limits on the time available to both the Faculty Member and the Administration for questioning witnesses, provided that...
View SourceView Similar (11)
Composition of Panel and Conduct of Hearing. 9.3.7.1 At a full evidentiary hearing before a Grievance Panel the charges shall be presented by a representative of the President, who may be an attorney. The Faculty Member may also have a representative, who may be an attorney. The hearing, however, is not considered a court of law, and formal rules of evidence do not apply. 9.3.7.2 The burden of proof that adequate cause exists rests with the University and will be satisfied only by clear and convincing evidence in the record considered as a whole. 9.3.7.3 The Grievance Panel shall consist of seven (7) members of the Grievance Committee selected as described in Article
View Source

Related to Composition of Panel and Conduct of Hearing

  • Rights Protection Mechanisms and Abuse Mitigation ­‐ Registry Operator commits to implementing and performing the following protections for the TLD: i. In order to help registrars and registrants identify inaccurate data in the Whois database, Registry Operator will audit Whois data for accuracy on a statistically significant basis (this commitment will be considered satisfied by virtue of and for so long as ICANN conducts such audits). ii. Work with registrars and registrants to remediate inaccurate Whois data to help ensure a more accurate Whois database. Registry Operator reserves the right to cancel a domain name registration on the basis of inaccurate data, if necessary. iii. Establish and maintain a Domains Protected Marks List (DPML), a trademark protection service that allows rights holders to reserve registration of exact match trademark terms and terms that contain their trademarks across all gTLDs administered by Registry Operator under certain terms and conditions. iv. At no cost to trademark holders, establish and maintain a Claims Plus service, which is a notice protection mechanism that begins at the end of ICANN’s mandated Trademark Claims period. v. Bind registrants to terms of use that define and prohibit illegal or abusive activity. vi. Limit the use of proxy and privacy registration services in cases of malfeasance. vii. Consistent with the terms of this Registry Agreement, reserve the right to exclude from distribution any registrars with a history of non-­‐compliance with the terms of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement. viii. Registry Operator will be properly resourced to perform these protections.

  • Human and Financial Resources to Implement Safeguards Requirements The Borrower shall make available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully implement the EMP and the RP.

  • PROCUREMENT ETHICS Contractor understands that a person who is interested in any way in the sale of any supplies, services, construction, or insurance to the State of Utah is violating the law if the person gives or offers to give any compensation, gratuity, contribution, loan, reward, or any promise thereof to any person acting as a procurement officer on behalf of the State of Utah, or who in any official capacity participates in the procurement of such supplies, services, construction, or insurance, whether it is given for their own use or for the use or benefit of any other person or organization.

  • Business Conduct Merger Sub was incorporated on November 5, 2020. Since its inception, Merger Sub has not engaged in any activity, other than such actions in connection with (a) its organization and (b) the preparation, negotiation and execution of this Agreement and the Transactions. Merger Sub has no operations, has not generated any revenues and has no assets or liabilities other than those incurred in connection with the foregoing and in association with the Merger as provided in this Agreement.

  • Implementation of Corrective Action Plan After the Corrective Action Plan is finalized, the Purchasers shall use reasonable best efforts to implement the finalized Corrective Action Plan on the timeline set forth therein and provide periodic reports (as provided for therein) to the Sellers on the status of their implementation of the Corrective Action Plan.