Concurrent Design Capacity Shortfall Sample Clauses

Concurrent Design Capacity Shortfall. (i) In the event and to the extent that, as of the Commercial Operation Date, the NECEC Transmission Line and the Québec Line are both only capable of operating below 1,090 MW, and (A) the NECEC Transmission Line and the Québec Line are both capable of operating at or above 1,040 MW and despite such condition Owner elects to begin transmission service under the Distribution Company TSA or (B) the NECEC Transmission Line or the Québec Line, or both, are capable of operating at less than 1,040 MW and despite such condition Owner requests and Distribution Company provides written consent to begin transmission service under the Distribution Company TSA, then the Parties shall have the Remediation Period to attempt to increase the operating capacity of their respective lines to 1,090 MW. If the actual capacity of the Québec Line is less than the actual capacity of the NECEC Transmission Line as of the Commercial Operation Date, Purchaser shall pay to Owner, for each day (or part thereof) following the Commercial Operation Date and until the end of the Remediation Period or such earlier date designated by Owner pursuant to the Distribution Company TSA (the “Concurrent Remediation Date”), an amount equal to One Hundred Dollars ($100) per MW per day multiplied by the Proportionate Share of the difference between the lesser of (x) the actual capacity of the NECEC Transmission Line and (y) 1,090 MW and the actual capacity of the Québec Line as of the Commercial Operation Date. Such payments shall be made on a monthly basis pursuant to invoices delivered by Owner to Purchaser.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Concurrent Design Capacity Shortfall. (i) In the event and to the extent that, as of the Commercial Operation Date: (A) (1) the NECEC Transmission Line is capable of operating below 1,200 MW and at or above 1,040 MW, or (2) the NECEC Transmission Line is capable of operating at less than 1,040 MW and despite such condition Owner requests and the RFP Sponsors provide written consent to begin transmission service under the RFP Sponsor TSAs; and (B) (1) the Québec Line is capable of operating below 1,200 MW and at or above 1,040 MW, or (2) the NECEC Transmission Line is capable of operating at less than 1,040 MW and despite such condition Owner requests and the RFP Sponsors provide written consent to begin transmission service under the RFP Sponsor TSAs; then Owner may elect to begin transmission service hereunder, and each Party shall have twenty-four (24) months from the Commercial Operation Date (the “Concurrent Remediation Period”), or such earlier date designated by the Parties in writing (the “Concurrent Remediation Date”) to attempt to increase the operating capacities of their respective lines to 1,200 MW. (ii) If, on the earlier of the Concurrent Remediation Date and the end of the Concurrent Remediation Period, (A) (x) Owner is unable to increase the operating capacity of the NECEC Transmission Line to more than 1,090 MW or in the event Owner elects not to cure such reduction in operating capacity or (y) Purchaser is unable to increase the operating capacity of the Québec Line to more than 1,090 MW or in the event Purchaser elects not to cure such reduction in operating capacity and Purchaser fails to pay the Transmission Service Payment on a monthly basis without downward adjustment to reflect such reduced capacity, then either Party may terminate this Agreement on written notice without further recourse by either Party against the other or (B) the operating capacity of the NECEC Transmission Line is more than 1,090 MW but less than 1,200 MW or the operating capacity of the Québec Line is more than 1,090 MW but less than 1,200 MW, this Agreement shall continue in effect at the lower of the capacity of the NECEC Transmission Line and the Québec Line, and the Contract Capacity shall be deemed modified accordingly.
View Source

Related to Concurrent Design Capacity Shortfall

  • Under-Frequency and Over Frequency Conditions The New York State Transmission System is designed to automatically activate a load- shed program as required by the NPCC in the event of an under-frequency system disturbance. Developer shall implement under-frequency and over-frequency relay set points for the Large Generating Facility as required by the NPCC to ensure “ride through” capability of the New York State Transmission System. Large Generating Facility response to frequency deviations of predetermined magnitudes, both under-frequency and over-frequency deviations, shall be studied and coordinated with the NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner in accordance with Good Utility Practice. The term “ride through” as used herein shall mean the ability of a Generating Facility to stay connected to and synchronized with the New York State Transmission System during system disturbances within a range of under-frequency and over-frequency conditions, in accordance with Good Utility Practice and with NPCC Regional Reliability Reference Directory # 12, or its successor.

  • Local Circuit Switching Capability, including Tandem Switching Capability 4.2.1 Local circuit switching capability is defined as all line-side and trunk-side facilities, plus the features, functions, and capabilities of the switch. The features, functions, and capabilities of the switch shall include the basic switching function of connecting lines to lines, lines to trunks, trunks to lines, and trunks to trunks. Local circuit switching includes all vertical features that the switch is capable of providing, including custom calling, custom local area signalling service features, and Centrex, as well as any technically feasible customized routing functions. 4.2.2 Notwithstanding BellSouth’s general duty to unbundle local circuit switching, BellSouth shall not be required to unbundle local circuit switching for ▇▇▇▇ when ▇▇▇▇: (1) serves an End User with four (4) or more voice-grade (DS0) equivalents or lines served by BellSouth in Zone 1 of one of the following MSAs: Atlanta, GA;

  • Adjustment of Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target Distribution Levels (a) The Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution, Third Target Distribution, Common Unit Arrearages and Cumulative Common Unit Arrearages shall be proportionately adjusted in the event of any distribution, combination or subdivision (whether effected by a distribution payable in Units or otherwise) of Units or other Partnership Securities in accordance with Section 5.10. In the event of a distribution of Available Cash that is deemed to be from Capital Surplus, the then applicable Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, shall be adjusted proportionately downward to equal the product obtained by multiplying the otherwise applicable Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, as the case may be, by a fraction of which the numerator is the Unrecovered Capital of the Common Units immediately after giving effect to such distribution and of which the denominator is the Unrecovered Capital of the Common Units immediately prior to giving effect to such distribution. (b) The Minimum Quarterly Distribution, First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third Target Distribution, shall also be subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 6.9.

  • Reallocation to a Class with a Lower Salary Range Maximum 1. If the employee meets the skills and abilities requirements of the position and chooses to remain in the reallocated position, the employee retains the existing appointment status and has the right to be placed on the Employer’s internal layoff list for the classification occupied prior to the reallocation. 2. If the employee chooses to vacate the position or does not meet the skills and abilities requirements of the position, the layoff procedure specified in Article 31 of this Agreement applies.

  • Reimbursement Amount Except for the metropolitan areas listed below, the maximum reimbursement for meals including tax and gratuity, shall be: Breakfast $ 9.00 Lunch $11.00 Dinner $16.00 For the following metropolitan areas the maximum reimbursement shall be: Breakfast $11.00 Lunch $13.00 Dinner $20.00 The metropolitan areas are: Atlanta Boston Cleveland Denver Hartford Kansas City Miami New York City Portland, OR San Francisco St. Louis Baltimore Chicago Dallas/Fort Worth Detroit Houston Los Angeles New Orleans Philadelphia San Diego Seattle Washington D.C. See Appendix L for details related to the boundaries of the above-mentioned metropolitan areas. The metropolitan areas also include any location outside the forty-eight (48) contiguous United States. Employees who meet the eligibility requirements for two (2) or more consecutive meals shall be reimbursed for the actual costs of the meals up to the combined maximum reimbursement amount for the eligible meals.