Contract Monitoring/Performance Evaluation Monitoring Sample Clauses

The Contract Monitoring/Performance Evaluation Monitoring clause establishes the procedures and standards for regularly assessing a party’s performance under the contract. Typically, this involves periodic reviews, reporting requirements, or the use of specific metrics to measure whether contractual obligations are being met. By setting clear expectations for oversight and evaluation, this clause helps ensure accountability and enables early identification and resolution of performance issues.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Contract Monitoring/Performance Evaluation Monitoring. At its discretion, the Bureau shall monitor CONTRACTOR’s performance to ensure compliance in accordance with all contract provisions, DMS’s instructions, and all applicable standards, including, but not limited to ACA, Administrative Rules, DMS and FDC guidelines/policies/procedures, specifications of this Contract, and court orders and decrees. FDC shall also provide audits and reviews and shall have the same access as DMS employees. 5.49.1.1. The On-Site Contract Monitor, designated representatives, and employees of the Bureau may conduct inspections as deemed necessary. The Bureau shall have the right, unless otherwise proscribed by law, to prompt access to examine and receive copies, if requested, of all records of CONTRACTOR relating to the Facility, including without limitation, all financial books and records, maintenance records, employee records, and inmate records generated by CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors, or independent contractors, in connection with the performance of this Contract. 5.49.1.2. The Bureau’s monitoring activities shall include review of subcontracts as previously described herein. The On-Site Contract Monitor shall provide the results of monitoring/inspection activities conducted to CONTRACTOR in writing. If CONTRACTOR noncompliance issues are noted during a monitoring activity, each shall be specifically identified and corrective action shall be recommended with a time frame specified to achieve compliance.
Contract Monitoring/Performance Evaluation Monitoring. 5.48.1.1. At its discretion, the Department will monitor CONTRACTOR’s performance to ensure compliance in accordance with all contract provisions, DMS’s instructions, and all applicable standards, including, but not limited to ACA Standards, Florida Administrative Code, Department and DC guidelines, specifications of the Contract, Court Orders and Decrees. DC will also provide audits and reviews and will have the same access as Department employees and other state entities as prescribed by law and at the Department’s request. 5.48.1.2. The On-Site Contract Monitor or designated representatives or employees of the Department shall conduct inspections as deemed necessary. The Department shall have the right, unless otherwise proscribed by law, to prompt access to examine and receive copies, if requested, of all records of CONTRACTOR relating to the Facility, including without limitation, all financial books and records, maintenance records, employee records, and inmate records generated by CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors, or independent CONTRACTORs, in connection with the performance of the Contract.
Contract Monitoring/Performance Evaluation Monitoring. At its discretion, the Bureau shall monitor CONTRACTOR and all applicable standards, including, but not limited to ACA, Administrative Rules, DMS and FDC guidelines/policies/procedures, specifications of this Contract, and court orders and decrees. FDC shall also provide audits and reviews and shall have the same access as DMS employees. 5.49.1.1. The On-Site Contract Monitor, designated representatives, and employees of the Bureau may conduct inspections as deemed necessary. The Bureau shall have the right, unless otherwise proscribed by law, to prompt access to examine and receive copies, if requested, of all records of CONTRACTOR relating to the Facility, including without limitation, all financial books and records, maintenance records, employee records, and inmate records generated by CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors, or independent contractors, in connection with the performance of this Contract. 5.49.1.2. The Bureau subcontracts as previously described herein. The On-Site Contract Monitor shall provide the results of monitoring/inspection activities conducted to CONTRACTOR in writing. If CONTRACTOR noncompliance issues are noted during a monitoring activity, each shall be specifically identified and corrective action shall be recommended with a time frame specified to achieve compliance.

Related to Contract Monitoring/Performance Evaluation Monitoring

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Evaluations Employee performance shall be evaluated and communicated on a yearly basis as required under County policy. Performance evaluations are used to demonstrate to employees that they are valued; record how an employee’s performance meet the requirements of the job; create a job history record; identify employee strengths and areas for enhancement; assist the employee and supervisor in an effort to attain the highest level of performance; and reinforce performance standards. Every effort will be made to include substantiated information within an employee’s performance evaluation. Non-recurring discipline history which is more than two (2) years old will not be referenced in performance evaluations. The County shall ensure employee performance evaluations are conducted in accordance with County and departmental policy. Performance evaluations and disciplinary matters shall only be conducted by County employees. When an employee who does not agree with the overall rating he/she receives on his/her written performance evaluation, he/she shall discuss and attempt to resolve the differences with his/her immediate supervisor. If discussion with his/her immediate supervisor does not result in resolution of the differences, the employee may file a written request to meet with the next level of management. Said request shall state the unresolved issues and the specific changes in the written performance evaluation the employee is seeking. The appropriate manager shall meet with the employee to discuss the unresolved issues. If the issues are not resolved to the employee’s satisfaction following discussion with the appropriate manager, the employee may within thirty (30) working days file a written request for a meeting with the department head. Within fourteen (14) working days of receipt of a written request stating the unresolved issues and the desired changes in the written performance evaluation, the department head shall meet with the employee to discuss the issues. Within ten (10) working days of said meeting, the department head shall respond in writing to the employee. The decision of the Department Head shall be final and not subject to the grievance procedure. An employee may submit a written response to his/her evaluation that shall be placed in his/her personnel file.

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.