Performance Evaluations Sample Clauses
The Performance Evaluations clause establishes the process and criteria for assessing an individual’s or entity’s work performance under an agreement. Typically, it outlines the frequency of evaluations, the standards or metrics used, and the parties responsible for conducting the assessments. This clause ensures that expectations are clearly communicated and provides a structured method for monitoring and improving performance, helping to address issues proactively and maintain accountability.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 9 times
Performance Evaluations. Employee performance shall be evaluated and communicated on a yearly basis as required under County policy. Performance evaluations are used to demonstrate to employees that they are valued; record how an employee’s performance meet the requirements of the job; create a job history record; identify employee strengths and areas for enhancement; assist the employee and supervisor in an effort to attain the highest level of performance; and reinforce performance standards. Every effort will be made to include substantiated information within an employee’s performance evaluation. Non-recurring discipline history which is more than two (2) years old will not be referenced in performance evaluations. The County shall ensure employee performance evaluations are conducted in accordance with County and departmental policy. Performance evaluations and disciplinary matters shall only be conducted by County employees. When an employee who does not agree with the overall rating he/she receives on his/her written performance evaluation, he/she shall discuss and attempt to resolve the differences with his/her immediate supervisor. If discussion with his/her immediate supervisor does not result in resolution of the differences, the employee may file a written request to meet with the next level of management. Said request shall state the unresolved issues and the specific changes in the written performance evaluation the employee is seeking. The appropriate manager shall meet with the employee to discuss the unresolved issues. If the issues are not resolved to the employee’s satisfaction following discussion with the appropriate manager, the employee may within thirty (30) working days file a written request for a meeting with the department head. Within fourteen (14) working days of receipt of a written request stating the unresolved issues and the desired changes in the written performance evaluation, the department head shall meet with the employee to discuss the issues. Within ten (10) working days of said meeting, the department head shall respond in writing to the employee. The decision of the Department Head shall be final and not subject to the grievance procedure. An employee may submit a written response to his/her evaluation that shall be placed in his/her personnel file.
Performance Evaluations. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.
Performance Evaluations. Employees shall be given the opportunity to sign the performance evaluation, but such signing does not indicate acceptance or rejection of the evaluation. The employee shall be the final signature and shall receive a copy of the performance evaluation at the time he/she signs it. Performance evaluations shall not be signed or presented by another employee covered by this Agreement. If the Appointing Authority adds comments to the performance evaluation after the evaluation has been signed by the employee, the Appointing Authority shall notify the employee of the change. The employee shall have twenty (20) calendar days from the date of the receipt of the finalized appraisal to file a written response in the employee's personnel file. Pursuant to Minnesota Management & Budget Administrative Procedure No. 20, an employee may appeal his/her performance rating to the Appointing Authority within thirty (30) calendar days of the official date of rating. The decision of the Appointing Authority is final. At the employee's request a Union Representative may be present during the appeal meeting(s). Upon request, an employee is entitled to a copy of his/her current position description. Upon request of a local union, an Appointing Authority shall develop an internal appeal system to review disputes regarding the accuracy of position descriptions. The Appointing Authority shall meet and confer with the local union prior to implementation of the appeal system. Such position descriptions shall not be grievable.
Performance Evaluations. The Consultant’s performance shall be evaluated periodically in accordance with the schedule set forth in APPENDIX D of this Contract. Final Consultant evaluations for Contracts executed after July 1, 2010, shall be considered in the future Consultant selection process as outlined in the APPENDIX D.
Performance Evaluations.
(a) Where a formal evaluation of an employee's performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity to meet with the Employer, read, review and ask questions about the evaluation. Employees will be paid for time incurred attending such meetings. The employee will be given up to seven days to read, review and sign the evaluation.
(b) The evaluation form shall provide for the employee's signature in two places, one indicating that the employee has read and accepts the evaluation, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the evaluation. An employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of an employee evaluation if the employee has signed in the place indicating disagreement with the evaluation.
(c) An employee evaluation shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this agreement.
(d) An employee shall receive a copy of his/her evaluation at time of signing.
(e) All performance evaluations shall be carried out in a confidential manner.
Performance Evaluations. A member's signature on any performance evaluation, if any, shall be viewed by the parties hereto only as a representation that he/she has read it. It shall not be viewed as a representation that a member has concurred in any or all of the contents or comments thereon. The performance evaluation will be used to provide feedback to members to improve performance, guide their professional development, and for promotional opportunities, if applicable. The original of the completed performance evaluation will be maintained in the member’s personnel file.
Performance Evaluations. See Article 18, Section 11, Performance Evaluations.
Performance Evaluations. TxDOT will conduct performance evaluations of DB Contractor’s major team members, consultants, and subcontractors. These evaluations will be conducted annually at twelve month intervals during the term of this Agreement, upon termination of this Agreement, and when TxDOT determines that work is materially behind schedule or not being performed according to the requirements of this Agreement. DB Contractor agrees to cooperate in the conducting of these evaluations.
Performance Evaluations. Prior to implementing procedures for ASF Members’ performance evaluations, the President/designee shall meet and confer with the Campuses Association. The instruments and procedures shall be uniform throughout the campus. Each ASF Member shall be evaluated regularly in accordance with these procedures. Job performance deficiencies noted in this evaluation are to be addressed in a plan for performance improvement developed by the supervisor after consultation with the ASF Member.
Performance Evaluations. Section 1. The EMPLOYER shall determine whether an employee is to be granted an in-range salary rate adjustment on a normal performance review interval established by the EMPLOYER for the employee's class. An employee shall not experience loss of such salary increase because completion of the performance evaluation is delayed through no fault of the employee.
Section 2. After an evaluation is completed, the employee will be given an (electronic) copy and provided an opportunity to respond to the evaluation in writing and have that response permanently attached to the evaluation. No changes may be made in the evaluation after the employee has received and signed his/her copy.
Section 3. When an employee who is eligible for an in-range merit adjustment receives a performance evaluation which results in the employee's not receiving such increase, he/she may request review of this decision by the appointing authority or his/her designee. Such request must be made to the appointing authority within twenty-four (24) calendar days from the date the employee receives the evaluation. If the decision of the appointing authority does not resolve the matter within thirty (30) calendar days following the employee's request for review, the matter may be referred to the Director of Human Resources for review by the Director or his/her designee. Such time limits may be waived by agreement of the parties.