Design Development Documents Review Sample Clauses

The Design Development Documents Review clause establishes the process by which one party reviews and approves design development documents prepared by another party, typically in a construction or design contract. This clause outlines the timeframe for submission, the standards or criteria for review, and the procedures for providing feedback or requesting revisions. For example, an architect may submit updated plans to the owner, who then has a set period to review and comment on them. The core function of this clause is to ensure that all parties have the opportunity to verify that the design meets project requirements before moving forward, thereby reducing the risk of misunderstandings or costly changes later in the project.
Design Development Documents Review. 4.4.1 After the Contracting Authority and Owner have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents, the Contracting Authority, Owner, and A/E shall meet to discuss the provisional Design Development Documents and reach agreement on any Contracting Authority-authorized adjustments to the Approved Program of Requirements, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the Design Development Documents. 4.4.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 business days after the review meeting, the A/E shall revise the Design Development Documents to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting (including any comments from the Ohio Homeland Security Infrastructure Protection and Technology Unit, which have been reviewed and approved by the Owner), and resubmit those documents to the Owner and Contracting Authority. 4.4.3 When the Contracting Authority and Owner approve the revised Design Development Documents and sign the related Design Review Acceptance form, the revised Design Development Documents shall become the final Design Development Documents. 5.1 Commencement
View SourceView Similar (13)
Design Development Documents Review. 4.7.1 TheAfter the Contracting Authority and Owner have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents, the Contracting Authority, Owner, A/E, and Contractor shall meet to reviewdiscuss the provisional Design Development Documents and the Contractor’s Design Development Stage Submission and to reach agreement on any Contracting Authority-authorized adjustments to the Approved Program of Requirements, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the provisional Design Development Documents and Contractor’s Design Development Stage Submission.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Design Development Documents Review. 5.5.5.1 After the Contracting Authority and Owner have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents and the CM’s Design Development Stage Submission, the Contracting Authority, Owner, A/E, and CM shall meet to discuss the submissions and reach agreement on any Owner-authorized adjustments to the Approved Program of Requirements, Project Schedule, or Construction Budget and any necessary clarifications of the Design Development Documents and the CM’s Design Development Stage Submission. 5.5.5.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within five business days after the review meeting, the A/E and CM shall revise their respective Design Development submissions to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting, and resubmit those documents to each other, the Owner, and Contracting Authority. 5.5.5.3 When the Contracting Authority and Owner approve the revised Design Development submissions and sign the related Design Review Acceptance form, the revised Design Development submissions shall become the final Design Development Documents.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Design Development Documents Review. 4.5.1 The Contracting Authority, the Owner, and the A/E shall meet to review the provisional Design Development Documents and to reach agreement on any Contracting Authority-authorized adjustments to the Approved Program of Requirements, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the provisional Design Development Documents. 4.5.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 business days after the review meeting, the Program A/E shall revise its Design Development Stage submission to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting, and resubmit those documents to the Owner and the Contracting Authority. When the Contracting Authority and the Owner approve of the revised Design Development Stage submission and sign the related Design Review Acceptance form, the revised Design Development Stage submission shall become the final Design Development Documents.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Design Development Documents Review. 4.6.1 After the Contracting Authority and Owner have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents, the Contracting Authority, Owner, A/E, and Contractor shall meet to discuss the provisional Design Development Documents and the Contractor’s Design Development Stage Submission and reach agreement on any Contracting Authority-authorized adjustments to the Approved Program of Requirements, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the provisional Design Development Documents and Contractor’s Design Development Stage Submission. 4.6.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 five business days after the review meeting, the A/E and Contractor shall revise their respective Design Development submissions to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting, jointly create a Design Development Stage package including their revised Design Development submissions, and submit the Design Development Stage package to each other, the CxA, Owner Agent (if applicable), Owner, and Contracting Authority. 4.6.3 When the Contracting Authority and Owner approve the Design Development Stage package and sign the related Design Review Acceptance form, the Design Development Stage package shall become the final Design Development Documents.
View Source
Design Development Documents Review. 4.6.1 After the Contracting Authority and Owner have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents, the Contracting Authority, Owner, A/E, and Contractor shall meet to discuss the provisional 4.6.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 five business days after the review meeting, the A/E and Contractor shall revise their respective Design Development submissions to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting (including any comments from the Ohio Homeland Security Infrastructure Protection and Technology Unit, which have been reviewed and approved by the Owner), and resubmit those documents to each other, the Owner, and Contracting Authority. 4.6.3 When the Contracting Authority and Owner approve the revised Design Development submissions and sign the related Design Review Acceptance form, the revised Design Development submissions shall become the final Design Development Documents.
View Source
Design Development Documents Review. 4.5.1 TheAfter the Contracting Authority, the and Owner, and the A/E shall meet have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents, the Contracting Authority, Owner, and toA/E shall meet to discuss the provisional Design Development Documents and reach agreement on any Contracting Authority-authorized adjustments to the Approved Program of Requirements, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the provisional Design Development Documents. 4.5.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 business days after the review meeting, the Program A/E shall revise itsthe Design Development Stage submissionDocuments to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting, and resubmit those documents to the Owner and the Contracting Authority.
View Source
Design Development Documents Review. 6.3.5.1 TheAfter the Contracting Authority, the and Owner, and the Criteria A/E shall meet to have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents and to, the Contracting Authority, Owner, and Criteria A/E shall meet to discuss the provisional Design Development Documents and reach agreement on any Contracting Authority- or Owner-authorized adjustments to the Final Concept and Design Criteria Documents, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the provisional Design Development Documents. 6.3.5.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 business days after the review meeting, the Criteria A/E shall revise itsthe Design Development Stage submissionDocuments to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting, and resubmit those documents to the Owner and the Contracting Authority.
View Source

Related to Design Development Documents Review

  • Design Development Documents See Section 2, Part 1, Article 2.1.5.

  • Design Development Phase 1.3.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Documents, model(s) and any adjustments to the Program of Requirements, BIM Execution Plan or Amount Available for the Construction Contract authorized by the Owner, the Architect/Engineer shall prepare, for approval by the Owner and review by the Construction Manager, Design Development Documents derived from the model(s) in accordance with Owner’s written requirements to further define and finalize the size and character of the Project in accordance with the BIM Execution Plan, “Facility Design Guidelines” and any additional requirements set forth in Article 15. The Architect/Engineer shall review the Design Development documents as they are being modeled at intervals appropriate to the progress of the Project with the Owner and Construction Manager at the Project site or other location specified by Owner in the State of Texas. The Architect/Engineer shall utilize the model(s) to support the review process during Design Development. The Architect/Engineer shall allow the Construction Manager to utilize the information uploaded into Owner’s PMIS to assist the Construction Manager in fulfilling its responsibilities to the Owner. 1.3.2 As a part of Design Development Phase, Architect/Engineer shall accomplish model coordination, aggregation and “clash detection” to remove conflicts in design between systems, structures and components. Architect/Engineer shall utilize Owner’s PMIS to accomplish model coordination and collaborate with Construction Manager in the resolution of critical clashes identified by the Construction Manager. Architect/Engineer shall demonstrate and provide written assurance to Owner that conflicts/collisions between models have been resolved. 1.3.3 The Architect/Engineer shall review the Estimated Construction Cost prepared by the Construction Manager, and shall provide written comments. 1.3.4 Before proceeding into the Construction Document Phase, the Architect/Engineer shall obtain Owner’s written acceptance of the Design Development documents and approval of the mutually established Amount Available for the Construction Contract and schedule. 1.3.5 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare presentation materials including an animation derived from the model(s) as defined in “Facility Design Guidelines” at completion of Design Development and if so requested shall present same to the Board of Regents at a regular meeting where scheduled within the state. 1.3.6 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare preliminary recommended furniture layouts for all spaces where it is deemed important to substantiate the fulfillment of program space requirements, or to coordinate with specific architectural, mechanical and electrical elements. 1.3.7 Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner, if requested, with seeking approval of the Project by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Such assistance shall include (i) the preparation of a listing of the rooms and square footages in the Project, and (ii) the preparation of project cost information, in accordance with THECB Guidelines. This information shall be provided at the completion of the Design Development Phase when requested by the Owner. The listing of rooms and square footages shall then be updated to reflect any changes occurring during construction and provided to the Owner at Substantial Completion. 1.3.8 At the completion of the Design Development Phase, or such other time as Owner may specify to Architect/Engineer, at Owner’s sole option and discretion, Owner will furnish Architect/Engineer with a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal prepared by Construction Manager based upon the Design Development documents prepared by the Architect/Engineer and approved by the Owner. The Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner and endeavor to further and advocate the Owner’s interests in Owner’s communications with the Construction Manager in an effort to develop a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal acceptable to Owner, in Owner’s sole option and discretion. If the Owner does not accept the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, the Architect/Engineer shall participate with the Owner and Construction Manager in constructability reviews and shall revise the documents as necessary in order to reach an agreement. If the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal exceeds the Schematic Design Phase Estimated Construction Cost prepared by, or otherwise accepted by the Construction Manager due to an increase in the scope of the Project caused by further development of the design documents by the Architect/Engineer to the extent that such could not be reasonably inferred by the Construction Manager from the Schematic Design documents, and Owner directs Architect/Engineer to revise the documents, the Architect/Engineer shall revise the documents at its own expense so that the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal for constructing the Project shall not exceed the Owner’s Amount Available for the Construction Contract and any previously approved Estimated Construction Costs. If it is determined to be in the Owner’s best interest, instead of requiring the Architect/Engineer to revise the Drawings and Specifications, the Owner reserves the right to accept a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that exceeds the stipulated Amount Available for the Construction Contract. The Architect/Engineer shall analyze the final Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal document, together with its supporting assumptions, clarifications, and contingencies, and shall submit a detailed written analysis of the document to the Owner. Such analysis shall include, without limitation, reference to and explanation of any inaccurate or improper assumptions and clarifications. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the Owner’s rejection of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal is not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein. 1.3.9 After the Guaranteed Maximum Price has been accepted, the Architect/Engineer shall incorporate necessary revisions into the Design Development documents. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the revisions are required as the result of inaccurate assumptions and clarifications made in the development of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that are not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Project Plan Development of Project Plan Upon the Authorized User’s request, the Contractor must develop a Project Plan. This Project Plan may include Implementation personnel, installation timeframes, escalation procedures and an acceptance plan as appropriate for the Services requested. Specific requirements of the plan will be defined in the RFQ. In response to the RFQ, the Contractor must agree to furnish all labor and supervision necessary to successfully perform Services procured from this Lot. Project Plan Document The Contractor will provide to the Authorized User, a Project Plan that may contain the following items: • Name of the Project Manager, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • Names of the Project Team Members, Contact Phone Numbers and E-Mail Address; • A list of Implementation milestones based on the Authorized User’s desired installation date; • A list of responsibilities of the Authorized User during system Implementation; • A list of designated Contractor Authorized Personnel; • Escalation procedures including management personnel contact numbers; • Full and complete documentation of all Implementation work; • Samples of knowledge transfer documentation; and • When applicable, a list of all materials and supplies required to complete the Implementation described in the RFQ. Materials and Supplies Required to Complete Implementation In the event that there are items required to complete an Implementation, the Contractor may request the items be added to its Contract if the items meet the scope of the Contract. Negotiation of Final Project Plan If the Authorized User chooses to require a full Project Plan, the State further reserves the right for Authorized Users to negotiate the final Project Plan with the apparent RFQ awardee. Such negotiation must not substantively change the scope of the RFQ plan, but can alter timeframes or other incidental factors of the final Project Plan. The Authorized User will provide the Contractor a minimum of five (5) business days’ notice of the final negotiation date. The Authorized User reserves the right to move to the next responsible and responsive bidder if Contractor negotiations are unsuccessful.

  • Development Phase contractual phase initiated with the approval of ANP for the Development Plan and which is extended during the Production Phase while investments in ▇▇▇▇▇, equipment, and facilities for the Production of Oil and Gas according to the Best Practices of the Oil Industry are required.