Common use of DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS Clause in Contracts

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ will recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the ▇▇▇▇ may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ will familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The ▇▇▇▇ will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ will routinely conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Construction Documents as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers.

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ will 9.1. CM@Risk shall periodically evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; design and other factors that may impact the cost estimateCost Model, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction ScheduleProject schedule and update each accordingly. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ 9.2. CM@Risk will recommendidentify, in conjunction with the Project Team, those any additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, that are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ to construct construction of the Project. Before initiating After completion of pre- construction operationsphase services, the ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk may request provide additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data the Data made available with the Construction Documentsconstruction documents. CM@Risk will be responsible for the time and cost required to obtain such additional investigations, except if otherwise provided by specific additional services. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ 9.3. CM@Risk will meet with the Project Team as required required, to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk will thoroughly familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various conceptual design, preliminary design phasesand development of detailed design documents. The ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, costs and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, systems and labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, as any concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ will routinely conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Construction Documents as 9.4. As necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team, CM@Risk will routinely conduct constructability and biddability reviews of the Drawings and Specifications. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents construction documents, especially those related to clarity, consistency, consistency and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers.

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ CMARE to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the ▇▇▇▇ CMARE may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, as concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will routinely conduct constructability and bidability biddability reviews of the Construction Documents as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers. 2.4.4.1 Constructability Reviews: The CMARE will evaluate whether (a) the Drawings and Specifications are configured to enable efficient construction, (b) design elements are standardized, (c) construction efficiency is properly considered in the Drawings and Specifications, (d) module/preassembly design are prepared to facilitate fabrication, transport and installation, (e) the design promotes accessibility of personnel, material and equipment and facilitates construction under adverse weather conditions, (f) sequences of Work required by or inferable from the Drawings and Specifications are practicable, and

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ CM will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ CM will recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ CM to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the ▇▇▇▇ CM may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ CM will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ CM will familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The ▇▇▇▇ CM will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ CM will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ CM will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ CM will routinely conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Construction Documents as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers.

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ will 17.4.1 CM@Risk must evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-cost- sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact create an unacceptable variance to the cost estimate, GMP Proposals Baseline Cost Model and/or the Construction Baseline Project Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ will 17.4.2 CM@Risk must recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operationsThese additional investigations, if agreed to be necessary by the ▇▇▇▇ may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve Project Manager and the adequacy Design Professional, will be acquired by City and completeness copies of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documentsreports will be provided to CM@Risk. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ will 17.4.3 CM@Risk must meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ will CM@Risk must familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phasespre- construction. The ▇▇▇▇ will CM@Risk must proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ will CM@Risk must furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ will recommend CM@Risk must use established value analysis principles in recommending cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ will 17.4.4 CM@Risk must routinely conduct constructability and bidability bid-ability reviews of the Construction Documents Drawings and Specifications as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will must attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, completeness and coordination of Work for of Subcontractors and Suppliers. 17.4.4.1 CM@Risk must evaluate whether: (a) the Drawings and Specifications are configured to enable efficient construction; (b) design elements are standardized; (c) construction efficiency is properly considered in the Drawings and Specifications; (d) module/preassembly design is prepared to facilitate fabrication, transport and installation;

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ CMARE to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the ▇▇▇▇ CMARE may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will routinely conduct constructability and bidability biddability reviews of the Construction Documents as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers. 2.4.4.1 Constructability Reviews: The CMARE will evaluate whether (a) the Drawings and Specifications are configured to enable efficient construction, (b) design elements are standardized, (c) construction efficiency is properly considered in the Drawings and Specifications, (d) module/preassembly design are prepared to facilitate fabrication, transport and installation, (e) the design promotes accessibility of personnel, material and equipment and facilitates construction under adverse weather conditions, (f) sequences of Work required by or inferable from the Drawings and Specifications are practicable, and

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ will 17.4.1 CM@Risk must evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-cost- sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact create an unacceptable variance to the cost estimate, GMP Proposals Baseline Cost Model and/or the Construction Baseline Project Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ will 17.4.2 CM@Risk must recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operationsThese additional investigations, if agreed to be necessary by the ▇▇▇▇ may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve Project Manager and the adequacy Design Professional, will be acquired by City and completeness copies of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documentsreports will be provided to CM@Risk. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ will 17.4.3 CM@Risk must meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ will CM@Risk must familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phasespre- construction. The ▇▇▇▇ will CM@Risk must proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ will CM@Risk must furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ will recommend CM@Risk must use established value analysis principles in recommending cost effective alternatives.alternatives.‌ 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ will 17.4.4 CM@Risk must routinely conduct constructability and bidability bid-ability reviews of the Construction Documents Drawings and Specifications as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will must attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, completeness and coordination of Work for of Subcontractors and Suppliers. 17.4.4.1 CM@Risk must evaluate whether: (a) the Drawings and Specifications are configured to enable efficient construction; (b) design elements are standardized; (c) construction efficiency is properly considered in the Drawings and Specifications; (d) module/preassembly design is prepared to facilitate fabrication, transport and installation;

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ will recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the ▇▇▇▇ may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ will familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The ▇▇▇▇ will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and DocuSign Envelope ID: 31AC7B5A-B8C9-4688-A97F-D0940E9127AE material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ will routinely conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Construction Documents as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers.

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ will shall evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Project Master Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ will shall recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the ▇▇▇▇ may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site Site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ will shall meet with the Project Team Team, as required required, to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ will shall familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The ▇▇▇▇ will shall proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, and labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ will furthermore shall advise the Project Team on proposed site Site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, as concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ will shall recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ will routinely shall conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Construction Documents Drawings and Specifications as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project TeamTeam and at a minimum as scheduled and identified by milestones in the Project Master Schedule required in Article 2.3 above. The reviews will shall attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents Documents, especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for of Subcontractors and Suppliers.

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ CMARE to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the ▇▇▇▇ CMARE may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will routinely conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Construction Documents as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers. 2.4.4.1 Constructability Reviews: The CMARE will evaluate whether (a) the Drawings and Specifications are configured to enable efficient construction, (b) design elements are standardized, (c) construction efficiency is properly considered in the Drawings and Specifications, (d) module/preassembly design are prepared to facilitate fabrication, transport and installation, (e) the design promotes accessibility of personnel, material and equipment and facilitates construction under adverse weather conditions, (f) sequences of Work required by or inferable from the Drawings and Specifications are practicable, and

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ will recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the ▇▇▇▇ may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ will familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phasesphases of design. The ▇▇▇▇ will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ will recommend and implement cost effective alternatives, as approved by the County. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ will routinely conduct constructability and bidability biddability reviews of the Construction Documents as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers. 2.4.4.1 Constructability Reviews: The ▇▇▇▇ will evaluate whether (a) the Drawings and Specifications are configured to enable efficient construction, (b) design elements are standardized, (c) construction efficiency is properly considered in the Drawings and Specifications, (d) module/preassembly design are prepared to facilitate fabrication, transport and installation, (e) the design promotes accessibility of personnel, material and equipment and facilitates construction under adverse weather conditions, (f) sequences of Work required by or inferable from the Drawings and Specifications are practicable, and

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ will 9.1. CM@Risk shall periodically evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; design and other factors that may impact the cost estimateCost Model, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction ScheduleProject schedule and update each accordingly. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ 9.2. CM@Risk will recommendidentify, in conjunction with the Project Team, those any additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, that are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ to construct construction of the Project. Before initiating construction operationsAfter completion of design phase services, the ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk may request provide additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data the Data made available with the Construction Documentsconstruction documents. CM@Risk will be responsible for the time and cost required to obtain such additional investigations, except if otherwise provided by specific additional services. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ 9.3. CM@Risk will meet with the Project Team as required required, to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk will thoroughly familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various conceptual design, preliminary design phasesand development of detailed design documents. The ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, costs and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, systems and labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, as any concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ CM@Risk will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ will routinely conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Construction Documents as 9.4. As necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team, CM@Risk will routinely conduct constructability and biddability reviews of the Drawings and Specifications. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents construction documents, especially those related to clarity, consistency, consistency and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers.

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ CMARE to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the ▇▇▇▇ CMARE may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will routinely conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Construction Documents as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers. 2.4.4.1 Constructability Reviews: The CMARE will evaluate whether (a) the Drawings and Specifications are configured to enable efficient construction, (b) design elements are standardized, (c) construction efficiency is properly considered in the Drawings and Specifications, (d) module/preassembly design are prepared to facilitate fabrication, transport and installation, (e) the design promotes accessibility of personnel, material and equipment and facilitates construction under adverse weather conditions, (f) sequences of Work required by or inferable from the Drawings and Specifications are practicable, and (g) the design has taken into consideration, efficiency issues concerning; access and entrance to the site, laydown and storage of materials, staging of site facilities, construction parking, and other similar pertinent issues. The CMARE shall identify, to the greatest extent practicable, discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents.

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ will recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the ▇▇▇▇ may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ will familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The ▇▇▇▇ will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ will routinely conduct constructability and bidability reviews of the Construction Documents as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers. 2.4.4.1 Constructability Reviews: The ▇▇▇▇ will evaluate whether (a) the Drawings and Specifications are configured to enable efficient construction, (b) design elements are standardized, (c) construction efficiency is properly considered in the Drawings and Specifications, (d) module/preassembly design are prepared to facilitate fabrication, transport and installation, (e) the design promotes accessibility of personnel, material and equipment and facilitates construction under adverse weather conditions, (f) sequences of Work required by or inferable from the Drawings and Specifications are practicable, and (g) the design has taken into consideration, efficiency issues concerning; access and entrance to the site, laydown and storage of materials, staging of site facilities, construction parking, and other similar pertinent issues.

DESIGN DOCUMENT REVIEWS. 2.4.1 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will evaluate periodically the availability of labor, materials/equipment, building systems, cost-sensitive aspects of the design; and other factors that may impact the cost estimate, GMP Proposals and/or the Construction Schedule. 2.4.2 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will recommend, in conjunction with the Project Team, those additional surface and subsurface investigations that, in its professional opinion, are required to provide the necessary information for the ▇▇▇▇ CMARE to construct the Project. Before initiating construction operations, the ▇▇▇▇ CMARE may request additional investigations in their GMP Proposal to improve the adequacy and completeness of the site condition information and data made available with the Construction Documents. 2.4.3 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will meet with the Project Team as required to review designs during their development. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will familiarize itself with the evolving documents through the various design phases. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will proactively advise the Project Team and make recommendations on factors related to construction costs, costs and concerns pertaining to the feasibility and practicality of any proposed means and methods, selected materials, equipment and building systems, and, and labor and material availability. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will furthermore advise the Project Team on proposed site improvements, excavation and foundation considerations, as well as, considerations including concerns that exist with respect to coordination of the Drawings and Specifications. The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will recommend cost effective alternatives. 2.4.4 The ▇▇▇▇ CMARE will routinely conduct constructability and bidability biddability reviews of the Construction Documents as necessary to satisfy the needs of the Project Team. The reviews will attempt to identify all discrepancies and inconsistencies in the Construction Documents especially those related to clarity, consistency, and coordination of Work for Subcontractors and Suppliers. 2.4.4.1 Constructability Reviews: The CMARE will evaluate whether (a) the Drawings and Specifications are configured to enable efficient construction, (b) design elements are standardized, (c) construction efficiency is properly considered in the Drawings and Specifications, (d) module/preassembly design are prepared to facilitate fabrication, transport and installation, (e) the design promotes accessibility of personnel, material and equipment and facilitates construction under adverse weather conditions, (f) sequences of Work required by or inferable from the Drawings and Specifications are practicable, and