EMPLOYEE EVALUATION A. Formal evaluation of employees shall be in writing and shall be for the purpose of establishing a record of the employee’s work performance. The evaluation may include but is not limited to: establishing performance standards and outcome measures, recognition of an employee’s efforts, as well as planning for improvement. Issues of attendance and punctuality may be addressed if they have previously been discussed with the employee. The employee’s job description shall be a basis for the evaluation. B. The evaluator shall review the written evaluation with the employee and provide the employee with a copy. The employee shall sign the evaluation acknowledging receipt. If the employee has objections to the evaluation, s/he, may within twenty (20) working days following receipt of the evaluation put such objections in writing and have them attached to the evaluation report and placed in his/her personnel file. C. The frequency of evaluations shall be determined by the District and generally occur every other year by April 1st for bargaining unit employees. If the District chooses to do so, it may conduct formal evaluations on an annual basis. An employee may request to receive one (1) annual evaluation. Such request shall be in writing to the employee’s supervisor with a copy to the Human Resources Department. D. The Human Resources Department will consult with the Federation in developing an outline of best practices to be used in conducting employee evaluations. E. When the District determines that an employee’s work performance is unsatisfactory, it shall inform the employee in writing of any deficiency and the improvement expected and provide the employee with the opportunity to correct the unsatisfactory performance within a reasonable time period established by the District. F. The judgment of an employee’s work performance by an evaluating supervisor shall not be the subject of a grievance. A grievance concerning an evaluation shall be limited to an allegation that the evaluation was done in bad faith or clearly untrue. The burden of proof shall rest with the grievant. Such grievance shall be filed at the next administrative level above that of the evaluator and that administrator shall provide a written decision within ten (10) working days of any hearing. If the grievance is not resolved, it may be appealed by submitting a written statement to the Human Resources Department within ten (10) working days following receipt of the administrative written decision. The written statement must clearly set forth why the previous decision is in error regarding the allegation of bad faith or being clearly untrue. The Director of Labor Relations, or designee, may review the record of the grievance and/or conduct a hearing and shall issue a written decision within ten (10) working days following such review or hearing. Such decision shall be final. G. Effective July 1, 2013, Sign Language Interpreters will be evaluated using the Educational Interpreter Performance Assessment (EIPA) pursuant to OAR 581-015-2035 and/or the District’s evaluation form.
Client Classification 7.1. We shall not have an obligation to treat our clients in different classes depending on their knowledge and expertise.
Product Quality Isoprene, (hereinafter referred to as “Product”) supplied and maintained on consignment at Belpre in accordance with Article 6, and will be in accordance with specifications set forth in Exhibit A. Seller will facsimile to the Buyer at time of shipment a Certificate of Analysis (COA). Seller will provide Buyer six (6) months advanced notification if there is a change in the manufacturing process that will affect the material specifications of Product provided to the Buyer. Product produced by the Seller in different plants is viewed as coming from different supply sources and requires separate qualifications. Product to be shipped for the Seller from third parties must be from a third party qualified by the Buyer based on Buyer’s criteria as specified in Exhibit B. Buyer will have the right to confirm each such shipment-conforms to the agreed specification; Seller must obtain approval prior to shipment any material that does not meet the Buyers specifications. If Seller deliveries Product failing to comply with the specifications set out in Exhibit A, Seller will reimburse Buyer for freight expenses associated with such shipment and be entitled at its option to i) require Seller to replace such defective Product at a price not to exceed the invoice value or ii) to reimburse the invoice value of the defective Product. If, Buyer has cause to complain that the quality of Product delivered to it pursuant to the Contract does not comply with the specification set out in Exhibit A, Buyer will give written notice specifying the nature of its complaint and the parties will promptly meet so as to resolve that complaint. In absence of any agreement to resolve the complaint the parties will appoint at their joint cost a mutually acceptable independent surveyor to examine whether the quality of Product as delivered complied with the specifications set forth in Exhibit A. In the absence of any written notice from Buyer to Seller within 30 days after delivery of the Product, the Product shall be deemed to have been delivered and accepted by Buyer in a satisfactory condition and in all respects in accordance with the specifications and Seller shall have no liability to Buyer with respect to that delivery.
Economic Uniformity At the election of the General Partner with respect to any taxable period ending upon, or after, the termination of the Subordination Period, all or a portion of the remaining items of Partnership gross income or gain for such taxable period, after taking into account allocations pursuant to Section 6.1(d)(iii), shall be allocated 100% to each Partner holding Subordinated Units that are Outstanding as of the termination of such Subordination Period (“Final Subordinated Units”) in the proportion of the number of Final Subordinated Units held by such Partner to the total number of Final Subordinated Units then Outstanding, until each such Partner has been allocated an amount of gross income or gain that increases the Capital Account maintained with respect to such Final Subordinated Units to an amount equal to the product of (A) the number of Final Subordinated Units held by such Partner and (B) the Per Unit Capital Amount for a Common Unit. The purpose of this allocation is to establish uniformity between the Capital Accounts underlying Final Subordinated Units and the Capital Accounts underlying Common Units held by Persons other than the General Partner and its Affiliates immediately prior to the conversion of such Final Subordinated Units into Common Units. This allocation method for establishing such economic uniformity will be available to the General Partner only if the method for allocating the Capital Account maintained with respect to the Subordinated Units between the transferred and retained Subordinated Units pursuant to Section 5.5(c)(ii) does not otherwise provide such economic uniformity to the Final Subordinated Units.
Proposed Goods and Services Proposed Goods and Services pdf D/M/WBE Certification OPTIONAL No response Warranty No response