Development of Architectural Program Sample Clauses

Development of Architectural Program. The Architect shall prepare for the District’s review an architectural program as follows: 2.2.1. Perform pre-design investigations to establish appropriate guidelines around which and within which the Project is to be designed. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by regulatory codes. Review all data pertinent to the Project including survey, site maps, geotechnical reports and recommendations, soil testing results reports, and pertinent historical data, and other relevant information provided by District. 2.2.2. Review DSA codes pertaining to the proposed Project design. 2.2.3. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by applicable regulatory codes. 2.2.4. Based on survey and topography data provided by the District, input into computer and develop existing conditions base for the Schematic Design Phase. 2.2.5. Administer Project as required to coordinate work with the District and between Consultants.
View SourceView Similar (16)
Development of Architectural Program. Architect shall prepare for the District’s review of an architectural program as follows: a. Perform pre-design investigations to establish appropriate guidelines around which and within which the Project is to be designed. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by regulatory codes. Review all data pertinent to the Project including survey, site maps, geotechnical reports and recommendations, soil testing results reports, and pertinent historical data, and other relevant information provided by District. b. Review DSA codes pertaining to the proposed Project design. c. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by applicable regulatory codes. d. Based on survey and topography data provided by the District, input into computer and develop existing conditions base for the Schematic Design Phase. e. Administer Project as required to coordinate work with the District and among Consultants. f. Develop District standards for facilities and construction, including but not limited to designation of any material, product, thing or service by specific brand or trade name pursuant to Public Contract Code section 3400, subdivision (c).
View SourceView Similar (13)
Development of Architectural Program. The Architect shall prepare for the District’s review an architectural program as follows: a. Perform pre-design investigations to establish appropriate guidelines around which and within which the Project is to be designed. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by regulatory codes. Review all data pertinent to the Project including survey, site maps, geotechnical reports and recommendations, soil testing results reports, and pertinent historical data, and other relevant information provided by District. b. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by applicable regulatory codes. c. Based on survey and topography data provided by the District, input into computer and develop existing conditions base for the Schematic Design Phase. d. Administer Project as required to coordinate work with the District and between subconsultants. e. Construction Cost Budget (i) Architect shall have responsibility to further develop review, and reconcile the Construction Cost Budget within the parameters of the Project Budget established in the District’s implementation plan. The estimates forming the basis of the Construction Cost Budget are to be based on the developed functional architectural programs as approved by the District. The following conditions apply to the Construction Cost Budget prepared by the Architect: (A) All costs are to be based on current bid prices, with escalation rate and duration clearly identified as a separate line item; rate of cost escalation and projected bid and construction dates are to be as approved by the District and its representatives. (B) Format shall be in a building systems format (e.g., foundations, substructure, structural system, exterior wall enclosure, window systems, etc.) for new buildings, and summarized by the Construction Specification Institute (CSI) category for buildings being modernized. (C) Contingencies for design, bidding, and construction are to be included as individual line items, with the percentage and base of calculation clearly identified. (D) The Architect shall include all information and estimates from the District and/or the Construction Manager that are intended to be part of the Construction Cost Budget. (E) One week prior to submittal of documents, the Architect shall submit its proposed Construction Cost Budget to the District and the Construction Manager for review and approval. At that time, the Architect ...
View SourceView Similar (3)
Development of Architectural Program. Architect shall prepare for District’s review an architectural program as follows: 2.2.1. Perform pre-design investigations to establish appropriate guidelines around which and within which the Project is to be designed. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by regulatory codes. Review all data pertinent to the Project including survey, site maps, geotechnical reports and recommendations, soil testing results reports, and pertinent historical data, and other relevant information provided by District. 2.2.2. Review applicable code sections of the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, including amendments. 2.2.3. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by applicable regulatory codes. 2.2.4. Based on survey and topography data provided by District, input into computer and develop existing conditions base for the Schematic Design Phase. 2.2.5. Administer Project as required to coordinate work with District and between Consultants. 2.2.6. Confer with District’s Technology Department to verify technological requirements for the Project.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Development of Architectural Program. Upon authorization from the District to proceed with the development of an architectural program for the Project, the Bridging Architect shall prepare for the District's review architectural program as follows: a. Perform pre-design investigations to establish appropriate guideline around which and within which the Project is to be designed. ldentify design issues relating to functional needs, space allocation, directives and constraints imposed by regulatory codes. Architectural Program to include but not be limited to: 1. A Project Program Summary that is inclusive of a Detailed Project Program and Design Criteria, as well as Spatial Adjacency Diagrams
View SourceView Similar (2)
Development of Architectural Program. Architect shall prepare for the District’s review an architectural program as follows: a. Perform pre-design investigations to establish appropriate guidelines around which and within which the Project is to be designed. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by regulatory codes. Review all data pertinent to the Project including survey, site maps, geotechnical reports and recommendations, soil testing results reports, and pertinent historical data, and other relevant information provided by District. b. Review DSA codes pertaining to the proposed Project design. c. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by applicable regulatory codes. d. Based on survey and topography data provided by the District, input into computer and develop existing conditions base for the Schematic Design Phase. e. Administer Project as required to coordinate work with the District and among Consultants. f. Prepare detailed functional architectural space list, including adjacency requirements for review and approval by District and its representatives prior to development of any conceptual floor plans.
View Source
Development of Architectural Program. The A-E shall prepare for the Owner’s review an Architectural program as follows: a. Perform pre-design investigations to establish appropriate guidelines around which and within which each Project is to be designed. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by regulatory codes. Review all data pertinent to each Project including survey, site maps, geotechnical reports and recommendations, soil testing results reports, and pertinent historical data, and other relevant information provided by Owner. b. Review DSA codes pertaining to the proposed Project design. c. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by applicable regulatory codes. d. Based on survey and topography data provided by the Owner, input into the computer and develop an existing conditions base for the Schematic Design Phase. e. Administer the Project as required to coordinate work with the Owner and between subconsultants.
View Source
Development of Architectural Program. The Architect shall prepare for the District’s review an architectural program as follows: 2.2.1. Perform pre-design investigations to establish appropriate guidelines around which and within which the Project is to be designed. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by regulatory codes. Review all data pertinent to the Project including survey, site maps, geotechnical reports and recommendations, soil testing results reports, and pertinent historical data, and other relevant information provided by District. 2.2.2. Review DSA codes pertaining to the proposed Project design. 2.2.3. Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by applicable regulatory codes. 2.2.4. Based on survey and topography data provided by the District, input into computer and develop existing conditions base for the Schematic Design Phase. 2.2.5. Administer Project as required to coordinate work with the District and between subconsultants. 2.2.6. Construction Cost Budget and Third-Party Estimator 2.2.6.1. Architect shall have responsibility to further develop review, and reconcile the Construction Cost Budget within the parameters of the Project Budget established in the District’s implementation plan. The estimates forming the basis of the Construction Cost Budget are to be based on the developed functional architectural programs as approved by the District. The following conditions apply to the Construction Cost Budget prepared by the Architect: 2.2.6.1.1. All costs are to be based on current bid prices, with escalation rate and duration clearly identified as a separate line item; rate of cost escalation and projected bid and construction dates are to be as approved by the District and its authorized representatives. 2.2.6.1.2. Format shall be in a building systems format (e.g., foundations, substructure, structural system, exterior wall enclosure, window systems, etc.) for new buildings, and summarized by the Construction Specification Institute (CSI) category for buildings being modernized. 2.2.6.1.3. Contingencies for design, bidding, and construction are to be included as individual line items, with the percentage and base of calculation clearly identified. 2.2.6.1.4. The Architect shall include all information and estimates from the District and/or the construction manager that are intended to be part of the Construction Cost Budget. 2.2.6.1.5. One week prior to submittal of documents,...
View Source
Development of Architectural Program. The Architect shall prepare for the District’s review an architectural program as follows: 5.1 Perform pre-design investigations to establish appropriate guidelines around which and within which the Project is to be designed, including: 5.1.1 Identify design issues relating to functional needs, directives and constraints imposed by regulatory codes. 5.1.2 Review all data pertinent to the Project including: surveys, site maps, geotechnical reports and recommendations, soil testing results reports, pertinent historical data, and other relevant information provided by District. 5.1.3 Review DSA requirements pertaining to the proposed Project design. 5.1.4 Based on survey and topography data provided by the District, input into computer and develop existing conditions base for the Schematic Design Phase 5.1.5 Administer Project as required to coordinate work with the District and among subconsultants.
View Source

Related to Development of Architectural Program

  • Curriculum Development This includes the analysis and coordination of textual materials; constant review of current literature in the field, some of which are selected for the college library collection, the preparation of selective, descriptive materials such as outlines and syllabi; conferring with other faculty and administration on curricular problems; and, the attendance and participation in inter and intra-college conferences and advisory committees.

  • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT A. Both the Board and the Association encourage teachers to seek professional improvement. In order to assist teachers in extending and improving their skills the following plan will be implemented. B. All Teachers will be encouraged to earn a Masters degree or coursework toward additional certification that is in the field of education and within a teacher's discipline, or in an area that is beneficial to the school. C. The Board will pay teacher's expenses for undergraduate and/or graduate credits, specialty and additional endorsements under the following conditions. 1. In allocating budgeted funds priority will be given to the teachers in a “masters” program and those teachers who need to complete coursework for certification. 2. All courses must be approved, in advance, by the Superintendent. Courses for recertification purposes must be approved in advance by the certification committee and the superintendent. The teacher shall receive a written reply from the Superintendent within ten (10) days of application for course approval (See Appendix D). 3. Each teacher will be eligible for up to six (6) semester hours of credit or, if enrolled in a matriculated, organized program, 12 semester hours of credit for undergraduate will be paid if part of a graduate program or graduate courses per contract year. The Superintendent reserves the right to request intent to take courses prior to final budget preparation. Failure to communicate such intent at the time of the Superintendent’s request may jeopardize course reimbursement due to a lack of funding. 4. The administration will pay in advance the cost of the course. Presentation of evidence of satisfactory completion of the course (A grade of B or better) is the responsibility of the teacher. In the event the course is not completed or not completed satisfactorily, the teacher will refund the payment received in advance and in accordance with Appendix D – attached. 5. Teachers who resign shall not be eligible for reimbursement after the date of resignation Teachers who have been reimbursed for any course work toward securing a masters within the last two (2) years of employment shall be required to continue their service to RSU # 78 for an additional two (2) years (twenty-four months) or will be required to reimburse the district the cost associated with Masters courses taken prior to departing, Such reimbursement to the district shall be remitted via payroll deductions as arranged between the District and employee, unless the failure to continue employment is due to illness, disability, death, or reduction of position. 6. Reimbursement will only be for tuition and fees. It will not include reimbursement for mileage, books and other expenses unless the teacher is required to take the course by the administration.

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Concession Area, including its abandonment.