Dispute Resolution Procedures Sample Clauses

The Dispute Resolution Procedures clause establishes the methods and steps parties must follow to resolve disagreements arising from the contract. Typically, it outlines a sequence such as negotiation, mediation, and, if necessary, arbitration or litigation, specifying timelines and forums for each stage. By providing a clear roadmap for handling disputes, this clause helps prevent escalation, reduces uncertainty, and ensures that conflicts are addressed efficiently and fairly.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 22 times
Dispute Resolution Procedures. (a) In the event a dispute arises about the interpretation, application, calculation of Loss, or calculation of payments or otherwise with respect to this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement (“SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item”), then the Receiver and the Assuming Bank shall make every attempt in good faith to resolve such items within sixty (60) days following the receipt of a written description of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item, with notification of the possibility of taking the matter to arbitration (the date on which such 60-day period expires, or any extension of such period as the parties hereto may mutually agree to in writing, herein called the “Resolution Deadline Date”). If the Receiver and the Assuming Bank resolve all such items to their mutual satisfaction by the Resolution Deadline Date, then within thirty (30) days following such resolution, any payment arising out such resolution shall be made arising from the settlement of the SF Shared-Loss Dispute. (b) If the Receiver and the Assuming Bank fail to resolve any outstanding SF Shared- Loss Dispute Items by the Resolution Deadline Date, then either party may notify the other of its intent to submit the SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item to arbitration pursuant to the provisions of this Article VII. Failure of either party to notify the other of its intent to submit any unresolved SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item to arbitration within thirty (30) days following the Resolution Deadline Date (the date on which such thirty (30) day period expires is herein called the “Arbitration Deadline Date”) shall be deemed an acceptance of such SF Shared-Loss Dispute not submitted to arbitration, as well as a waiver of the submitting party’s right to dispute such non- submitted SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item but not a waiver of any similar claim which may arise in the future. (c) If a SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item is submitted to arbitration, it shall be governed by the rules of the American Arbitration Association (the “AAA”), except as otherwise provided herein. Either party may submit a matter for arbitration by delivering a notice, prior to the Arbitration Deadline Date, to the other party in writing setting forth: (i) A brief description of each SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item submitted for arbitration; (ii) A statement of the moving party’s position with respect to each SF Shared-Loss Dispute Item submitted for arbitration; (iii) The value sought by the moving party, or other relief requested regarding each SF Shared-Loss Dis...
Dispute Resolution Procedures. 1. Any disagreement, claim or dispute between DARPA and the Performer concerning questions of fact or law arising from or in connection with this Agreement, and, whether or not involving an alleged breach of this Agreement, may be raised only under this Article.
Dispute Resolution Procedures. The parties agree to make a good faith effort to informally resolve any dispute before submitting the dispute to arbitration in accordance with the following procedures:
Dispute Resolution Procedures. It is the policy of OGS to provide interested parties, as defined in the OGS Dispute Resolution Procedures, with an opportunity to administratively resolve disputes, complaints or inquiries related to Solicitations, contract awards and contract administration. OGS encourages interested parties to seek resolution of disputes through consultation with OGS staff. All such matters shall be accorded impartial and timely consideration. Interested parties may also file formal written disputes. A copy of the OGS Dispute Resolution Procedures may be obtained by contacting the designated contact for the Solicitation, the Contract manager, or at the OGS website. OGS reserves the right to change the procedures set forth in the Dispute Resolution Procedures without seeking a Contract amendment.
Dispute Resolution Procedures. 4.1 The TAFE Commission and its Employees have an interest in the proper application of this Schedule and in minimising and settling disputes about matters in this Schedule in a timely manner. 4.2 Where a dispute arises in relation to: 4.2.1 a matter under this Schedule; or 4.2.2 the National Employment Standards; it will be dealt with in accordance with the procedures set out in this clause. 4.3 An Employer or Employee may appoint another person, organisation or association to accompany and/or represent them for the purposes of this clause. The Employer recognises the Union as a representative of an employee who is a member of the Union under these procedures. 4.4 In the first instance Employee(s) or their appointed representative(s), must notify the appropriate representative of management of the dispute in writing (‘the dispute notification’). An appropriate representative of management may be the relevant line manager or if the employee believes the line manager is not appropriate the Employee may ask the Human Resources Manager to refer the matter to another officer. 4.5 The dispute notification must be in writing and include details of the dispute. The dispute notification should also make reference to clause(s) of the Schedule or the National Employment Standard in relation to which the dispute has arisen and indicate the resolution(s) sought. A copy of the dispute notification will be sent to the Human Resources Manager. The Employee(s), Employee representative(s) if one has been appointed, and management representative(s) will meet within five working days, unless otherwise agreed, in an effort to resolve the dispute. 4.6 Where after the completion of subclause 4.5 the dispute remains unresolved, the matter may be referred in writing to the next level of management. A meeting must be held within five working days of the dispute being referred in a further effort to resolve the dispute, unless otherwise agreed. 4.7 Where a dispute is not resolved following the steps in sub-clauses 4.5 and 4.6, the matter may be referred by either party to the dispute to the Fair Work Commission for resolution by mediation and/or conciliation and, if necessary arbitration. 4.8 If the Fair Work Commission arbitrates the dispute, it may also use the powers that are available to it under the Fair Work Act 2009. 4.9 The parties agree to be bound by and implement any decision of the Fair Work Commission subject to either party exercising a right of appeal against the dec...
Dispute Resolution Procedures. Disputes shall be resolved pursuant to the administrative rules promulgated in accordance with Section 201.112(a) of the Code, adopted by TxDOT in accordance with the Texas Administrative Procedure Act, and effective under Rule §9.2 of Subchapter A, Chapter 9, Part 1, Title 43 of the Texas Administrative Code and subject to (i) the procedures set forth in Sections 4.9 and 4.10 of the General Conditions and (ii) the requirements set forth in Exhibit 20 to this DBA. The Partiesagreement regarding Dispute Resolution Procedures as set forth in this Section 11.1 shall survive expiration or earlier termination of the Term and continue in effect thereafter for so long as either Party has any obligation originating under the Contract Documents.
Dispute Resolution Procedures. The Parties will first attempt in good faith to negotiate resolution of any dispute, claim, counterclaim, demand, cause of action, controversy and other matter in question associated with, arising out of or relating to this Agreement (a “Dispute”) within fifteen (15) Business Days after written notice of such Dispute by any Party, by discussions between senior managers. If resolution is not reached during such time, unless otherwise agreed to by the Gatherer and Shipper, any Dispute must be resolved through the use of binding arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association (the “AAA”). If there is any inconsistency between this Section 18 and the Commercial Arbitration Rules, the terms of this Section 18 shall control the rights and obligations of the Parties. 18.1 If there is more than one Dispute that involves the same Parties as the Parties with respect to which arbitration has been initiated pursuant to this Agreement, such Disputes may be consolidated into the first initiated arbitration pursuant to this Agreement; provided that the arbitral tribunal for the first initiated arbitration determines that: (a) the new dispute presents significant issues of law or fact common with those in the first initiated arbitration, (b) no Party would be unduly prejudiced, and (c) consolidation under these circumstances would not result in undue delay for the first initiated arbitration. 18.2 Arbitration may be initiated by a Party serving written notice (“Claimant”) on the other Party (“Respondent”) that the Claimant has referred the Dispute to binding arbitration pursuant to this Section 18. Claimant’s notice initiating binding arbitration must describe in reasonable detail the nature of the Dispute and the facts and circumstances relating thereto. Respondent shall respond to Claimant within thirty (30) calendar Days after receipt of Claimant’s notice initiating binding arbitration and the parties will mutually appoint an arbitrator within sixty (60) Days after Claimant’s original notice. The arbitrator must be a neutral party who has never been an officer, director or employee of the Claimant or Respondent or any Affiliate of either. Unless Claimant and Respondent agree otherwise, the arbitrator must have not less than seven (7) years of experience in the energy industry with experience in exploration, production and pipeline gathering issues. If the Claimant and Respondent are unable to agree on an arbitrato...
Dispute Resolution Procedures. Any disagreement, claim or dispute between the Government and the Performer concerning questions of fact or law arising from or in connection with this Agreement, and, whether or not involving an alleged breach of this Agreement, may be raised only under this Article. Whenever disputes, disagreements, or misunderstandings arise, the Parties shall attempt to resolve the issue(s) involved by discussion and mutual agreement as soon as practicable. In no event shall a dispute, disagreement or misunderstanding which arose more than three (3) months prior to the notification made under subparagraph B.3 of this article constitute the basis for relief under this article unless the USSOCOM Director of Procurement in the interests of justice waives this requirement. Failing resolution by mutual agreement, the aggrieved Party shall document the dispute, disagreement, or misunderstanding by notifying the other Party in writing of the relevant facts, identify unresolved issues, and specify the clarification or remedy sought. Within five (5) working days after providing notice to the other Party, the aggrieved Party may, in writing, request a joint decision by the USSOCOM Deputy Director of Procurement and Chief Executive Officer of the Performer. The other Party shall submit a written position on the matter(s) in dispute within thirty (30) calendar days after being notified that a decision has been requested. The USSOCOM Deputy Director of Procurement and the Performer’s designated representative shall conduct a review of the matter(s) in dispute and render a decision in writing within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of such written position. Any such joint decision is final and binding. In the absence of a joint decision, upon written request to USSOCOM Director of Procurement, made within thirty (30) calendar days of the expiration of the time for a decision under subparagraph B.3 above, the dispute shall be further reviewed. The USSOCOM Director of Procurement may elect to conduct this review personally or through a designee or jointly with the Performer’s designated representative. Following the review, the USSOCOM Director of Procurement or designee will resolve the issue(s) and notify the Parties in writing. Such resolution is not subject to further administrative review and, to the extent permitted by law, shall be final and binding.
Dispute Resolution Procedures. It is understood and agreed that any dispute or objection to any proposed or ongoing law enforcement operation or activity on school grounds will be consistent with N.J.A.C. 6A:16- 6.2(b)15, and shall be directed by the appropriate school official to the chief executive officer of the law enforcement agency involved. Where the chief executive officer of the agency is for any reason unable to satisfactorily resolve the dispute or objection, the matter shall be referred to the (county prosecutor), who is hereby authorized to work in conjunction with the (executive county superintendent of schools) and, where appropriate, the Division of Criminal Justice, to take appropriate steps to resolve the matter. Any dispute that cannot be resolved at the county level shall be resolved by the Attorney General whose decision shall be binding.
Dispute Resolution Procedures. If at the end of the Call Resolution Period or the Put Resolution Period, as applicable, WCAS and Walgreens have been unable to resolve any differences that they may have with respect to the determination of the applicable Exercise Price, as specified in a Call Objection or Put Objection, as applicable, they shall refer all such matters that remain in dispute (the “Unresolved Matters”) to a nationally recognized independent accounting firm jointly selected by them (the “Valuation Firm”), with WCAS acting on behalf of the Put Sellers or Call Sellers, as the case may be. If WCAS and Walgreens are unable to agree upon the Valuation Firm, then each such party shall select a nationally recognized independent accounting firm, and those two firms will mutually agree on a third nationally recognized independent accounting firm, and such firm will alone serve as the “Valuation Firm”. WCAS and Walgreens shall act in good faith to agree upon, as soon as reasonably practicable, the terms on which the Valuation Firm shall act (and for these purposes acting in good faith shall include agreeing to any commercially reasonable terms proposed by the Valuation Firm (including without limitation its fees, costs and any limitations on its liability)). Following agreement by WCAS and Walgreens on the relevant terms, WCAS and Walgreens shall each sign terms of engagement which reflect such terms as agreed by the Valuation Firm solely for the purpose of determining the Exercise Price (the “Terms of Engagement”). If WCAS and Walgreens fail to agree on Terms of Engagement for the Valuation Firm within ten (10) Business Days after the end of the Call Resolution Period or Put Resolution Period, as applicable, WCAS and Walgreens agree that each of them shall execute the standard form of the Valuation Firm’s terms of engagement as proposed by the Valuation Firm for its appointment. The Valuation Firm shall, acting as experts in valuation and not as arbitrators, determine, on a basis consistent with the requirements of this Agreement, and only with respect to the unresolved matters so submitted, whether and to what extent the Call Exercise Price Notice or Put Exercise Price Notice, as applicable, requires adjustment to the Exercise Price. WCAS and Walgreens shall instruct the Valuation Firm to (i) use its commercially reasonably efforts to render its final written determination within thirty (30) days after such firm’s engagement and (ii) prepare a final calculation of the Exercise Pric...