Effect of Changes in Law (Other than PERS Litigation) Clause Samples

The 'Effect of Changes in Law (Other than PERS Litigation)' clause defines how contractual obligations or terms are adjusted if there are changes in applicable laws, excluding those related to PERS (Public Employees Retirement System) litigation. Typically, this clause outlines the process for notifying the other party of a relevant legal change, and may allow for renegotiation of terms, adjustment of costs, or other modifications to ensure compliance. Its core function is to allocate risk and provide a mechanism for adapting the contract to remain lawful and fair in the face of evolving legal requirements, thereby preventing disputes or breaches due to unforeseen legislative changes.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Effect of Changes in Law (Other than PERS Litigation). In the event that the State’s payment of a six percent (6%) employee contribution under Section 1 or under Section 2, as applicable, must be discontinued due to a change in law, valid ballot measure, constitutional amendment, or a final, non-appealable judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction (other than in the PERS Litigation), the State shall increase by six percent (6%) the base salary rates for each classification in the salary schedules in lieu of the six percent (6%) pick-up. This transition shall be done in a manner to assure continuous payment of either the six percent (6%) contribution or a six percent (6%) salary increase. For the reasons indicated above, or by mutual agreement, if the State ceases paying the applicable six percent (6%) pickup and instead provides a salary increase for eligible bargaining unit employees during the term of the Agreement, and bargaining unit employees are able, under then-existing law, to make their own six percent (6%) contributions to their PERS account or the Individual Account Program account, as applicable, such employees’ contributions shall be treated as “pre-tax” contributions pursuant to Internal Revenue Code, Section 414(h)(2).
View SourceView Similar (69)
Effect of Changes in Law (Other than PERS Litigation). In the event that the State’s payment of a six percent (6%) employee contribution under Section 1 or under section 2, as applicable, must be discontinued due to a change in law, valid ballot measure, constitutional amendment, or a final, non-appealable judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction (other than in the PERS Litigation), the State shall increase by six percent (6%) the base salary rates for each classification in the salary schedules in lieu of the six percent (6%) pick-up. This transition shall be done in a manner to assure continuous payment of either the six percent (6%) contribution or a six percent (6%) salary increase.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Effect of Changes in Law (Other than PERS Litigation). In the event the City’s payment of a six percent (6%) employee contribution under Article 17.1(A) or (B) , as applicable, must be discontinued due to a change in law, valid ballot measure, constitutional amendment, or a final, non-appealable judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction (other than the PERS Litigation), the City shall increase by six percent (6%) the base salary rates for each classification in the salary schedules applicable to the members of the bargaining unit in lieu of the six percent (6%) pick-up. This transition shall be done in a manner to assure continuous payment of either the six percent (6%) contribution or a six percent (6%) salary increase. For reasons indicated above or by mutual agreement, if the City ceases paying the applicable six percent (6%) pick-up and instead provides a salary increase for eligible bargaining unit employees during the term of this agreement, and bargaining unit employees are able, under existing law, to make their own six percent (6%) contribution to their PERS account or to the Individual Account Program account, as applicable, such employees’ contributions shall be treated as “pre-tax” contributions pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 414(h)(2).
View SourceView Similar (2)
Effect of Changes in Law (Other than PERS Litigation). In the event the City’s payment of a six percent (6%) employee contribution under Article 16.1 or Article 16.2 , as
View SourceView Similar (2)
Effect of Changes in Law (Other than PERS Litigation). In the event that the City’s payment of a six percent (6%) employee contribution must be discontinued due to a change in law, valid ballot measure, constitutional amendment, or final, non- appealable judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction (other than in the PERS Litigation), the City shall increase by six percent (6%) the base salary rates for each classification in the salary schedules in lieu of the six percent pick up. This transition shall be done in a manner to assure continuous payment of either the six percent (6%) contribution or a six percent (6%) salary increase. For the reasons indicated above, or by mutual agreement, if the City ceases paying the applicable six percent (6%) pickup and instead provides a salary increase for eligible bargaining unit employees during the term of the Agreement, and bargaining unit employees are able, under then-existing law, to make their own six percent (6%) contributions to their PERS account or the Individual Account Program account, as applicable, such employees’ contributions shall be treated as “pre-tax” contributions pursuant to Internal Revenue Code, Section 414(h)(2).
View Source

Related to Effect of Changes in Law (Other than PERS Litigation)

  • Compliance with Laws; Litigation Except (i) for the matters covered by the representations set forth in Sections 7.12, 7.15, 7.19, 7.20 and 7.23, as to which the representations in Sections 7.13(a) and (b) shall not apply, and (ii) as set forth in Schedule 7.13: (a) The assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries and their uses comply with all applicable Requirements of Laws and Court Orders, except where the failure to do so could not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. (b) The Company and its Subsidiaries have complied with all Requirements of Laws and Court Orders that are applicable to their respective assets or businesses, except where the failure to do so could not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect. (c) The Company and its Subsidiaries own, hold or possess all necessary permits, licenses, franchises and other authorizations from a Governmental Authority required to conduct their respective businesses substantially as conducted presently, except where the failure to do so could not be reasonably expected to have a Material Adverse Effect; and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is in default in any material respect under any such permit, license, franchise or other authorization. (d) There are no civil, criminal, administrative or regulatory lawsuits, claims, suits, proceedings, arbitrations or investigations pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or affecting in any material respect its or their properties or assets nor, to the Knowledge of the Company, is there any basis for any of the same, and there are no lawsuits, claims or proceedings pending or threatened in which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is the plaintiff or claimant. (e) There are no civil, criminal, administrative or regulatory lawsuits, claims, suits, proceedings, arbitrations or investigations pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened against the executive officers of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries by reason of the past employment relationship of any such officer. (f) To the Knowledge of the Company, no legislative or regulatory proposal or other proposal for any change in any Requirement of Law, in each case which is specifically focused on the industries in which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries operates, is pending which, if adopted, could adversely affect the Company’s or its Subsidiaries ability to conduct their respective businesses as currently conducted or planned to be conducted.

  • CONFORMITY WITH LAW; LITIGATION Except to the extent set forth on Schedule 5.21 or 5.13, and except for violations which, either singly or in the aggregate, have not had and will not have any Material Adverse Effect, the Company is not in violation of any law or regulation or any order of any court or Federal, state, municipal or other governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality having jurisdiction over it; and except to the extent set forth on Schedule 5.10 or 5.13, there are no material claims, actions, suits or proceedings, pending or, to the knowledge of the Stockholders, threatened against or affecting, the Company, at law or in equity, or before or by any Federal, state, municipal or other governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality having jurisdiction over it and no notice of any claim, action, suit or proceeding, whether pending or threatened, has been received by the Company, and, to the knowledge of the Stockholders, there is no basis for any such claim, action, suit or proceeding. The Company has conducted and is now conducting its business in compliance with the requirements, standards, criteria and conditions set forth in applicable federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, orders, approvals, variances, rules and regulations, including all such orders and other governmental approvals set forth on Schedules 5.12 and 5.13, except where any such noncompliance, individually or in the aggregate, would not have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Litigation; Compliance with Law Except as disclosed, there is no (i) action, suit, claim, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, threatened against or affecting the Company, at law or in equity, or before or by any municipal or other governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign; (ii) arbitration proceeding relating to the Company pending under collective bargaining agreements or otherwise; or (iii) governmental inquiry pending or, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, threatened against or affecting the Company (including, without limitation, any inquiry as to the qualification of the Company to hold or receive any license or permit), and, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, there is no reasonable basis for any of the foregoing. The Company is not in default with respect to any governmental order, writ, judgment, injunction or decree known to or served upon the Company of any court or of any governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign. There is no action or suit by the Company pending or threatened against others. The Company has complied in all respects with all laws, rules, regulations and orders applicable to its businesses, operations, properties, assets, products and services, and the Company has all necessary permits, licenses and other authorizations required to conduct its business as conducted and as proposed to be conducted, except to the extent failure to comply or obtain any such permits, licenses or authorizations will not have a material adverse effect. There is no existing law, rule, regulation or order, and the Company is not aware of any proposed law, rule, regulation or order, which would prohibit or materially restrict the Company from, or otherwise materially and adversely affect the Company in, conducting its business in any jurisdiction in which it is now conducting business or in which it proposes to conduct business.

  • Litigation; Compliance with Laws (a) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.09, there are no actions, suits or proceedings at law or in equity or by or before any Governmental Authority now pending or, to the knowledge of Holdings or the Borrower, threatened against or affecting Holdings or the Borrower or any Subsidiary or any business, property or rights of any such person (i) that involve any Loan Document or the Transactions or (ii) as to which there is a reasonable possibility of an adverse determination and that, if adversely determined, could reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to result in a Material Adverse Effect. (b) Since the date of this Agreement, there has been no change in the status of the matters disclosed on Schedule 3.09 that, individually or in the aggregate, has resulted in, or materially increased the likelihood of, a Material Adverse Effect. (c) None of Holdings, the Borrower or any of the Subsidiaries or any of their respective material properties or assets is in violation of, nor will the continued operation of their material properties and assets as currently conducted violate, any law, rule or regulation (including any zoning, building, Environmental Law, ordinance, code or approval or any building permits) or any restrictions of record or agreements affecting the Mortgaged Property, or is in default with respect to any judgment, writ, injunction, decree or order of any Governmental Authority, where such violation or default could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect. (d) Certificates of occupancy and permits are in effect for each Mortgaged Property as currently constructed, and true and complete copies of such certificates of occupancy have been delivered to the Collateral Agent as mortgagee with respect to each Mortgaged Property.

  • Litigation and Compliance with Law (a) There are no actions, suits, arbitrations, controversies or other proceedings or investigations (or, to the best knowledge and belief of management of FNB, any facts or circumstances which reasonably could result in such), including, without limitation, any such action by any governmental or regulatory authority, which currently exist or are ongoing, pending or, to the best knowledge and belief of management of FNB, threatened, contemplated or probable of assertion, against, relating to or otherwise affecting FNB, its subsidiaries or any of their respective properties, assets or employees which, if determined adversely, could result in liability on the part of FNB or its subsidiaries for, or subject FNB or its subsidiary to, material monetary damages, fines or penalties or an injunction, or which could have a Material Adverse Effect on FNB and its subsidiaries or on FNB’s ability to consummate the Merger. (b) Except for such licenses, permits, orders, authorizations or approvals (“Permits”) the absence of which would not have a Material Adverse Effect on FNB or its subsidiaries, each of FNB and its subsidiaries has all Permits of any federal, state, local or foreign governmental or regulatory body that are material to or necessary for the conduct of its respective business or to own, lease and operate its respective properties. Except as would not have a Material Adverse Effect on FNB and its subsidiaries, all such Permits are in full force and effect and no violations are or have been recorded in respect of any such Permits. No proceeding is pending or, to the best knowledge and belief of management of FNB, threatened or probable of assertion to suspend, cancel, revoke or limit any Permit. (c) Neither FNB nor any of its subsidiaries is subject to any supervisory agreement, enforcement order, writ, injunction, capital directive, supervisory directive, memorandum of understanding or other similar agreement, order, directive, memorandum or consent of, with or issued by any regulatory or other governmental authority (including, without limitation, the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC or the OCC) relating to its financial condition, directors or officers, employees, operations, capital, regulatory compliance or otherwise; there are no judgments, orders, stipulations, injunctions, decrees or awards against FNB or its subsidiaries which in any manner limits, restricts, regulates, enjoins or prohibits any present or past business or practice of FNB or its subsidiaries; and neither FNB nor any of its subsidiaries has been advised or has any reason to believe that any regulatory or other governmental authority or any court is contemplating, threatening or requesting the issuance of any such agreement, order, injunction, directive, memorandum, judgment, stipulation, decree or award. (d) Neither FNB nor any of its subsidiaries is in violation or default under, and each has complied with, all laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders, writs, injunctions or decrees of any court or federal, state, municipal or other governmental or regulatory authority having jurisdiction or authority over it or its business operations, properties or assets (including without limitation all provisions of North Carolina law relating to usury, the Consumer Credit Protection Act, and all other laws and regulations applicable to extensions of credit) except for any such violation, default or noncompliance as does not or would not have a Material Adverse Effect on FNB and its subsidiaries, and, to the best knowledge and belief of management of FNB, there is no basis for any claim by any person or authority for compensation, reimbursement or damages or otherwise for any violation of any of the foregoing.