Step-In Rights 11.1 Without prejudice to the provisions of Schedule 4 (Performance Management) or to any remedy that the Authority may have (whether under this Agreement or otherwise): 11.1.1 where the Authority reasonably believes that the Operator’s failure to provide any part of the Services to the relevant Service Level or otherwise in accordance with this Agreement has an adverse, material impact on the business of the Authority or on the running of the Scheme; 11.1.2 where the Authority reasonably believes that the Operator is about to commit such a failure which, if committed, would have such an impact; 11.1.3 where the Authority considers it necessary in order to carry out any of its statutory obligations, functions or other duties; 11.1.4 on the occurrence of a Force Majeure Event; or 11.1.5 on the occurrence of an Insolvency Event in respect of the Operator, the Authority may, by giving such written notice to the Operator as the Authority considers reasonable in the circumstances, exercise its right under Clause 11.2. 11.2 In the circumstances set out in Clause 11.1 the Authority may make arrangements for the Authority to provide and perform itself or through another contractor, such part of the Services as it decides in its discretion. Where any failure on the Operator's part is, in the reasonable opinion of the Authority, due to the failure of the Operator's management or supervisory staff to perform their work adequately or at all, or is due to the absence or insufficiency of such staff, the Authority may cause the relevant Services to be managed and supervised by the Authority's own staff, or the staff of another contractor. 11.3 Where the Authority exercises its right pursuant to Clause 11.2, the Operator shall:- 11.3.1 provide the Authority and Authority Personnel such access as is necessary for the Authority to exercise its right; 11.3.2 grant and procure that any Sub-Contractor or relevant third party grants the Authority such licences as are reasonably required (for itself or a contractor appointed to perform the step-in services) for the purposes of the Authority exercising its right; 11.3.3 afford (and procure that its Sub-Contractors afford) to the Authority (and any contractor appointed to perform the step-in services) such co-operation and access to any of the Operator's Intellectual Property, the Third Party Intellectual Property, Operator systems, premises, equipment, documents, information or other items as are reasonably required for the purposes of exercising its right; and 11.3.4 indemnify and keep indemnified the Authority from and against all Losses arising in connection with the exercise of its rights pursuant to this Clause 11.
No Creation of a Partnership or Exclusive Purchase Right Nothing contained in this Agreement, and no action taken pursuant hereto shall be deemed to constitute the relationship created hereby between the Note Holders as a partnership, association, joint venture or other entity. No Note Holder shall have any obligation whatsoever to offer to any other Note Holder the opportunity to purchase a participation interest in any future loans originated by such Note Holder or its Affiliates and if any Note Holder chooses to offer to any other Note Holder the opportunity to purchase a participation interest in any future mortgage loans originated by such Note Holder or its Affiliates, such offer shall be at such purchase price and interest rate as such Note Holder chooses, in its sole and absolute discretion. No Note Holder shall have any obligation whatsoever to purchase from any other Note Holder a participation interest in any future loans originated by such Note Holder or its Affiliates.
SMALL CLAIMS COURT OPTION YOU MAY CHOOSE TO LITIGATE ANY DISPUTE BETWEEN YOU AND ANY OF US IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT, RATHER THAN IN ARBITRATION, IF THE DISPUTE MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS TO BE HEARD IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT.
March-in Rights The Performer agrees that, with respect to any subject invention in which it has retained title, DARPA has the right to require the Performer, an assignee, or exclusive licensee of a subject invention to grant a non-exclusive license to a responsible applicant or applicants, upon terms that are reasonable under the circumstances, and if the Performer, assignee, or exclusive licensee refuses such a request, DARPA has the right to grant such a license itself if DARPA determines that: 1. Such action is necessary because the Performer or assignee has not taken effective steps, consistent with the intent of this Agreement, to achieve practical application of the subject invention; 2. Such action is necessary to alleviate health or safety needs which are not reasonably satisfied by the Performer, assignee, or their licensees; 3. Such action is necessary to meet requirements for public use and such requirements are not reasonably satisfied by the Performer, assignee, or licensees; or 4. Such action is necessary because the agreement required by paragraph (H) of this Article has not been obtained or waived or because a licensee of the exclusive right to use or sell any subject invention in the United States is in breach of such Agreement.
Proceedings Other Than Proceedings by or in the Right of the Company Indemnitee shall be entitled to the rights of indemnification provided in this Section l(a) if, by reason of his Corporate Status (as hereinafter defined), the Indemnitee is, or is threatened to be made, a party to or participant in any Proceeding (as hereinafter defined) other than a Proceeding by or in the right of the Company. Pursuant to this Section 1(a), Indemnitee shall be indemnified against all Expenses (as hereinafter defined), judgments, penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him, or on his behalf, in connection with such Proceeding or any claim, issue or matter therein, if the Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner the Indemnitee reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the Company, and with respect to any criminal Proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the Indemnitee’s conduct was unlawful.