Common use of Engaging Students in Learning Clause in Contracts

Engaging Students in Learning. Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished The learning tasks and activities, materials, resources, instructional groups and technology are poorly aligned with the instructional outcomes or require only rote responses. The pace of the lesson is too slow or too rushed. Few students are intellectually engaged or interested. The learning tasks and activities are partially aligned with the instructional out- comes but require only minimal thinking by students, allowing most to be passive or merely compliant. The pacing of the lesson may not provide students the time needed to be intellectually engaged. The learning tasks and activities are aligned with the instructional outcomes and designed to challenge student thinking, the result being that most students display active intellectual engagement with important and challenging content and are supported in that engagement by teacher sca¤▇▇▇▇▇▇. The pacing of the lesson is appropriate, providing most students the time needed to be intellectually engaged. Virtually all students are intellectually engaged in challenging content through well-designed learning tasks and suitable scafolding by the teacher and fully aligned with the instructional outcomes. In addition, there is evidence of some student initiation of inquiry and of student contribution to the exploration of important content. The pacing of the lesson provides students the time needed to intellectually engage with and reflect upon their learning and to consolidate their understanding. Students may have some choice in how they complete tasks and may serve as resources for one another. Critical Attributes Few students are intellectually engaged in the lesson. Learning tasks require only recall or have a single correct response or method. The materials used ask students to perform only rote tasks. Only one type of instructional group is used (whole group, small groups) when variety would better serve the instructional purpose. Instructional materials used are unsuitable to the lesson and/or the students. The lesson drags or is rushed. Some students are intellectually engaged in the lesson. Learning tasks are a mix of those requiring thinking and recall. Students are in large part passively engaged with the content, learning primarily facts or procedures. Students have no choice in how they complete tasks. The teacher uses di¤erent instructional groupings; these are partially successful in achieving the lesson objectives. The materials and resources are partially aligned to the lesson objectives and only in some cases demand student thinking. The pacing of the lesson is uneven— suitable in parts, but rushed or dragging in others. Most students are intellectually engaged in the lesson. Learning tasks have multiple correct responses or approaches and/or demand higher-order thinking. Students have some choice in how they complete learning tasks. There is a mix of di¤erent types of groupings, suitable to the lesson objectives. Materials and resources support the learning goals and require intellectual engagement, as appropriate. The pacing of the lesson provides students the time needed to be intellectually engaged. In addition to the characteristics of “proficient”: Virtually all students are highly engaged in the lesson. Students take initiative to modify a learning task to make it more meaningful or relevant to their needs Students suggest modifications to the grouping patterns used. Students have extensive choice in how they complete tasks. Students suggest modifications or additions to the materials being used. Students have an opportunity for both reflection and closure after the lesson to consolidate their understanding. Criterion 2: Demonstrating efective teaching practices.

Appears in 2 contracts

Sources: Collective Bargained Agreement, Collective Bargained Agreement

Engaging Students in Learning. Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished The learning tasks and activities, materials, resources, instructional groups and technology are poorly aligned with the instructional outcomes or require only rote responses. The pace of the lesson is too slow or too rushed. Few students are intellectually engaged or interested. The learning tasks and activities are partially aligned with the instructional out- comes but require only minimal thinking by students, allowing most to be passive or merely compliant. The pacing of the lesson may not provide students the time needed to be intellectually engaged. The learning tasks and activities are aligned with the instructional outcomes and designed to challenge student thinking, the result being that most students display active intellectual engagement with important and challenging content and are supported in that engagement by teacher sca¤▇▇▇▇▇▇scafolding. The pacing of the lesson is appropriate, providing most students the time needed to be intellectually engaged. Virtually all students are intellectually engaged in challenging content through well-designed learning tasks and suitable scafolding by the teacher and fully aligned with the instructional outcomes. In addition, there is evidence of some student initiation of inquiry and of student contribution to the exploration of important content. The pacing of the lesson provides students the time needed to intellectually engage with and reflect upon their learning and to consolidate their understanding. Students may have some choice in how they complete tasks and may serve as resources for one another. Critical Attributes Few students are intellectually engaged in the lesson. Learning tasks require only recall or have a single correct response or method. The materials used ask students to perform only rote tasks. Only one type of instructional group is used (whole group, small groups) when variety would better serve the instructional purpose. Instructional materials used are unsuitable to the lesson and/or the students. The lesson drags or is rushed. Some students are intellectually engaged in the lesson. Learning tasks are a mix of those requiring thinking and recall. Students are in large part passively engaged with the content, learning primarily facts or procedures. Students have no choice in how they complete tasks. The teacher uses di¤erent different instructional groupings; these are partially successful in achieving the lesson objectives. The materials and resources are partially aligned to the lesson objectives and only in some cases demand student thinking. The pacing of the lesson is uneven— suitable in parts, but rushed or dragging in others. Most students are intellectually engaged in the lesson. Learning tasks have multiple correct responses or approaches and/or demand higher-order thinking. Students have some choice in how they complete learning tasks. There is a mix of di¤erent different types of groupings, suitable to the lesson objectives. Materials and resources support the learning goals and require intellectual engagement, as appropriate. The pacing of the lesson provides students the time needed to be intellectually engaged. In addition to the characteristics of “proficient”: Virtually all students are highly engaged in the lesson. Students take initiative to modify a learning task to make it more meaningful or relevant to their needs Students suggest modifications to the grouping patterns used. Students have extensive choice in how they complete tasks. Students suggest modifications or additions to the materials being used. Students have an opportunity for both reflection and closure after the lesson to consolidate their understanding. Criterion 2: Demonstrating efective effective teaching practices.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Collective Bargained Agreement