Common use of Evaluation and Review of Performance Results Clause in Contracts

Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of HSP performance, • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern, • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the relevant timeframe, and • determining levels of intervention and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and PathWest, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate PathWest’s performance are listed in the PMP. These performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO and may be increased if performance issues occur.

Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of HSP performance, • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern, • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the relevant timeframe, and • determining levels of intervention and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and PathWestNMHS, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate PathWestNMHS’s performance are listed in the PMP. These performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO and may be increased if performance issues occur.

Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of HSP performance, • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern, • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the relevant timeframe, and • determining levels of intervention and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and PathWest▇▇▇▇▇, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate PathWest’s ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ performance are listed in the PMP. These performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO and may be increased if performance issues occur.

Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of HSP performance, • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern, • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the relevant timeframe, and • determining levels of intervention and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and PathWestSMHS, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate PathWestSMHS’s performance are listed in the PMP. These performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO and may be increased if performance issues occur.

Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of HSP performance, • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern, • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the relevant timeframe, and • determining levels of intervention and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and PathWestCAHS, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate PathWestCAHS’s performance are listed in the PMP. These performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO and may be increased if performance issues occur.

Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of HSP performance, • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern, • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the relevant timeframe, and • determining levels of intervention and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and PathWestthe QC, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate PathWestthe QC’s performance are listed in the PMP. These performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO and may be increased if performance issues occur.

Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of HSP performance, • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern, • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the relevant timeframe, and • determining levels of intervention and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and PathWestHSS, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate PathWest’s HSS’ performance are listed in the PMP. These performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO and may be increased if performance issues occur.