Common use of Evaluation Methodology Clause in Contracts

Evaluation Methodology. FACTOR 1:– TECHNICAL APPROACH (VOLUME I) a. The Offeror’s proposed Configuration Management (CM) process will be evaluated to determine the level of process documentation and the application of CM in support of, at a minimum, SOW paragraph 12; to determine the Offeror’s understanding of the CM requirements for this acquisition; and to determine whether the Offeror’s CM process and experience on programs of similar size and complexity are adequate to satisfy the requirements in this solicitation. b. The Offeror’s proposed process(es) and experience in managing engineering changes or deviations to the TDP and controlling the insertion of those changes into the production line will be evaluated to determine the Offeror’s demonstrated ability to understand and address engineering changes and updated production requirements, at a minimum, SOW paragraph 12.4. In addition, the Offeror will be evaluated on its approach in updating and verifying production line changes and processes. c. The Offeror’s Quality Assurance (QA) process will be evaluated to verify that it is ANSI/ASQC Q9001 or ISO 9001 or equivalent, certified, to determine the level of process documentation and the level of compliance, at a minimum, with SOW paragraph 19. The Offeror’s FACAR system will be evaluated to determine its capability to support the requirements of SOW paragraph 12.5.

Appears in 2 contracts

Sources: Contract, Contract