Common use of Evaluation of Full Status Full-Time Faculty Clause in Contracts

Evaluation of Full Status Full-Time Faculty. All full-status full-time faculty members shall be subject to formal evaluation once every four (4) years, utilizing the tools and procedures outlined in the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ College Faculty Evaluation Handbook. The evaluation process is to be non-punitive, promoting growth and opportunities for professional development. Where an evaluation results in an overall composite rating (OCR) score of less than 3.88, deficiencies must be stated in writing along with a plan for improvement formulated by the faculty member in consultation with the assigned faculty mentor and the designated administrator. The faculty mentor is assigned by the Designated Administrator for a period of two years. The faculty mentor will be compensated at a rate of one (1) contact hour per year. Evaluations will continue every two years until the OCR score is 3.88 or greater, at which time the regular evaluation cycle resumes. If the OCR score is less than 3.88 after mentoring occurs, faculty will be subject to the formal evaluation process outlined in the Faculty Evaluation Handbook every two years until such time as the OCR score rises to 3.88 or greater. Faculty mentor support will be provided for one (1) two-year period. If evaluation results in an OCR score of 4.50 or greater, the faculty member will receive recognition from the College for their achievement. In addition, all full status full-time faculty will have a checkpoint review meeting in the middle of the four year evaluation cycle (defined as two years after the last evaluation). The checkpoint review process is as follows: A. One IDEA survey will be distributed to students in the semester prior to the checkpoint review meeting following the same process used in the evaluation process. B. The Faculty will have sole possession of their detailed data, which includes the data cover sheets. The faculty mem- ber will provide a copy of their review process student data cover sheets to their designated administrator. C. The IDEA results will not be tied to the evaluation score system. D. The purpose of the checkpoint review meeting will be to have dialogue between the faculty member and the des- ignated administrator regarding student data results, professional development activities and continuous improve- ment objectives. The faculty will bring with them, for the purpose of review and discussion, both the IDEA student data and their proposed professional development activities for the coming semesters. E. In lieu of a face-to-face meeting, exceptional circumstances (i.e. faculty member is out of state, faculty member has other full-time employment) may dictate the use of an alternative meeting format (i.e. phone or Internet meeting). F. The Administration will develop a standardized form to be utilized for recording professional development plans.

Evaluation of Full Status Full-Time Faculty. All full-status full-time faculty members shall be subject to formal evaluation once every four (4) years, utilizing the tools and procedures outlined in the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ College Faculty Evaluation Handbook. The evaluation process is to be non-punitive, promoting growth and opportunities for professional development. Where an evaluation results in an overall composite rating (OCR) score of less than 3.88, deficiencies must be stated in writing along with a plan for improvement formulated by the faculty member in consultation with the assigned faculty mentor and the designated administrator. The faculty mentor is assigned by the Designated Administrator for a period of two years. The faculty mentor will be compensated at a rate of one (1) contact hour per year. Evaluations will continue every two years until the OCR score is 3.88 or greater, at which time the regular evaluation cycle resumes. If the OCR score is less than 3.88 after mentoring occurs, faculty will be subject to the formal evaluation process outlined in the Faculty Evaluation Handbook every two years until such time as the OCR score rises to 3.88 or greater. Faculty mentor support will be provided for one (1) two-year period. If evaluation results in an OCR score of 4.50 or greater, the faculty member will receive recognition from the College for their achievement. In addition, all full status full-time faculty will have a checkpoint review meeting in the middle of the four year evaluation cycle (defined as two years after the last evaluation). The checkpoint review process is as follows: A. A . One IDEA survey will be distributed to students in the semester prior to the checkpoint review meeting following the same process used in the evaluation process.process.‌ B. B . The Faculty will have sole possession of their detailed data, which includes the data cover sheets. The faculty mem- ber will provide a copy of their review process student data cover sheets to their designated administrator. C. The IDEA results will not be tied to the evaluation score system. D. The purpose of the checkpoint review meeting will be to have dialogue between the faculty member and the des- ignated administrator regarding student data results, professional development activities and continuous improve- ment objectives. The faculty will bring with them, for the purpose of review and discussion, both the IDEA student data and their proposed professional development activities for the coming semesters. E. In lieu of a face-to-face meeting, exceptional circumstances (i.e. faculty member is out of state, faculty member has other full-time employment) may dictate the use of an alternative meeting format (i.e. phone or Internet meeting). F. The Administration will develop a standardized form to be utilized for recording professional development plans.