Evaluation Panels Sample Clauses

The Evaluation Panels clause establishes a group or committee responsible for assessing proposals, bids, or performance in relation to a contract or procurement process. Typically, this panel is composed of individuals with relevant expertise who review submissions based on predefined criteria, ensuring a fair and objective selection process. By formalizing the evaluation process, this clause helps prevent bias, promotes transparency, and ensures that decisions are made based on merit and compliance with the stated requirements.
Evaluation Panels. The evaluation of respondents to GDC-initiated or SEP- initiated procurements of HTP Packages shall include as a voting member (i) one representative having requisite expertise related to the procurement from each of GDC, the HTP operator or user (e.g., NJ TRANSIT) and Amtrak on any evaluation panel for HTP Contract Documents specific to the design and/or construction of the HTP, and (ii) one representative having requisite expertise related to the procurement from the applicable SEP on any evaluation panel for HTP Contract Documents for an HTP Package being delivered by an SEP pursuant to an SEP Agreement (in the event such SEP is not already represented on the panel pursuant to clause (i)). The Parties acknowledge and agree that personnel participating on an evaluation panel shall be required to comply with any required or customary rules and procedures governing the confidentiality and the integrity of the bid process with respect to procurement of HTP Contract Documents, and such personnel may be required, as a condition of participation, to execute non-disclosure agreements, and other documents as GDC may reasonably require, reflecting the same.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Evaluation Panels a. When the Employer uses an evaluation panel, the evaluation panel will be comprised of at least three
View SourceView Similar (2)
Evaluation Panels. A. A panel may be set up to evaluate candidates if the personnel office decides it is needed. B. An evaluation panel will be used for technical professional, and wage grade positions with ten
View Source

Related to Evaluation Panels

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Evaluators The success of a program of evaluation depends upon a high level of skill and training of all participants in the process. The District shall provide annual training on the Colorado State Educator Evaluation System and ongoing training on inter-rater reliability using approved materials from the Colorado Department of Education. As required by Colorado law, all performance evaluations must be conducted by an individual who has completed a training in evaluation skills that has been approved by the Department of Education.

  • Evaluator Any person designated by a superintendent who has primary or supervisory responsibility for observation and evaluation. The superintendent is responsible for ensuring that all Evaluators have training in the principles of supervision and evaluation. Each Educator will have one primary Evaluator at any one time responsible for determining performance ratings. i) Primary Evaluator shall be the person who determines the Educator’s performance ratings and evaluation. ii) Supervising Evaluator shall be the person responsible for developing the Educator Plan, supervising the Educator’s progress through formative assessments, evaluating the Educator’s progress toward attaining the Educator Plan goals, and making recommendations about the evaluation ratings to the primary Evaluator at the end of the Educator Plan. The Supervising Evaluator may be the primary Evaluator or his/her designee.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.