EVALUATION PANEL Sample Clauses

EVALUATION PANEL. Submittals will be evaluated by a panel based on the stated criteria and are responsible for selecting the proposal that is most advantageous to the City.
View SourceView Similar (4)
EVALUATION PANEL. The parties agree that each shall, no later than fourteen (14) days after the execution and adoption of this agreement select members of a five (5) member panel whose duty shall be the evaluation and selection of an A & E firm for performance of the design of construction documents for the proposed improvements; and,
View Source
EVALUATION PANEL. For the purpose ol evaluating th performance of Managers direclly accountable to lhe Executive Mayor an evaluation panel constituted of the followinq persons must be es\ablished- a. Executive Mayor or Mayor b. Chairperson of the Performance Audit Committee and/or the Audit Committee Member; c. Member of the Mayoral or Executive Committee; d. Mayor/or Municipal Manager from another municipality e. Member of ▇▇▇▇ committee as nominated by the executive mayor or mayor F. PMS (as Secretariat)
View Source
EVALUATION PANEL a group of three individuals appointed by the Employer to review applications for vacant or projected vacant positions, to rank and rate qualified applicants.
View Source
EVALUATION PANEL. To evaluate each Proposer’s response to the criteria set forth in paragraphs 5.2.9.2 E-H above, the SFPUC will assemble an evaluation panel. The evaluation panel will score each Proposal’s responses to the Evaluation Criteria with bonus points awarded as described below.
View Source
EVALUATION PANEL. The Districts shall each appoint two (2) representatives to serve on the Evaluation Panel for the Joint RFP.
View Source
EVALUATION PANEL. The County will form an evaluation panel for Joint RFP responses, with two (2) representatives from each of the Parties for a total of six (6) members on the panel.
View Source
EVALUATION PANEL. Evaluation of the proposals will be made by a Section Panel appointed by the VCTC. VCTC will appoint a Panel Chair from among the Panel members. The Evaluation Panel shall examine each proposal which meets the mandatory requirements and recommend a contractor to the VCTC. The recommendation must receive the approval by vote of the Ventura County Transportation Commission in order to be awarded.
View Source
EVALUATION PANEL. The procedures outlined in AKANGR 40-335/AKARNGR 811-1 apply to applicants for both Dual Status and Non Dual Status positions in the Alaska National Guard. If there are more than 10 qualified applicants, the Human Resources Office will appoint an evaluation panel. Evaluation panels shall be established for the purpose of rating and ranking candidates for the position to be filled.
View Source

Related to EVALUATION PANEL

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Evaluator Any person designated by a superintendent who has primary or supervisory responsibility for observation and evaluation. The superintendent is responsible for ensuring that all Evaluators have training in the principles of supervision and evaluation. Each Educator will have one primary Evaluator at any one time responsible for determining performance ratings. i) Primary Evaluator shall be the person who determines the Educator’s performance ratings and evaluation. ii) Supervising Evaluator shall be the person responsible for developing the Educator Plan, supervising the Educator’s progress through formative assessments, evaluating the Educator’s progress toward attaining the Educator Plan goals, and making recommendations about the evaluation ratings to the primary Evaluator at the end of the Educator Plan. The Supervising Evaluator may be the primary Evaluator or his/her designee.

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Evaluators The success of a program of evaluation depends upon a high level of skill and training of all participants in the process. The District shall provide annual training on the Colorado State Educator Evaluation System and ongoing training on inter-rater reliability using approved materials from the Colorado Department of Education. As required by Colorado law, all performance evaluations must be conducted by an individual who has completed a training in evaluation skills that has been approved by the Department of Education.

  • Evaluation Committee A. The Association and the Board agree to establish a standing joint Evaluation Committee comprised of members of the District Leadership Council for the purpose of evaluating the policy, procedure and process for the evaluation of certified teachers in the District.