Evaluation Roles Sample Clauses

Evaluation Roles. (a) YSI has entered into a contract with the Urban Institute (the “Independent Evaluator”) to be responsible for creating the Master List, the Roca List and the Control List, all in accordance with Section 3.03(b) and Section 3.03(c) of this Contract and with the Evaluation Plan, verifying the number of young people served by Roca, making the calculations described in Sections 4.03(d), (f) and (g) of this Contract, applying the evaluation criteria, performance measurement criteria and evaluation methodology set forth in the Evaluation Plan to Roca’s efforts, and performing such other functions as are set forth in the Evaluation Plan. The contract between YSI and the Urban Institute provides that ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall supervise all of the Urban Institute's efforts. YSI shall not replace the Urban Institute nor consent to the replacement of ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ without the written approval of the other Parties, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. It is acknowledged that in order for YSI to replace the Urban Institute or any successor as the Independent Evaluator or to consent to the replacement of ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, YSI requires the consent of the Senior Lender. (b) YSI has entered into a contract with Third Sector Capital Partners, Inc. (“Third Sector”) to provide services and serve as the project manager under this Contract (the “Project Manager”). The Project Manager will be responsible for managing this Contract, including ensuring the flow of information between the Parties, and other responsibilities set forth herein and in the Project Manager’s contract. Pursuant to the contract between YSI and Third Sector, Third Sector shall provide that ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will carry out the duties of the Project Manager. YSI shall not replace Third Sector nor consent to the replacement of ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ without the written approval of the other Parties, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. It is acknowledged that in order for YSI to replace Third Sector or any successor as the Project Manager or to consent to the replacement of ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, YSI requires the consent of the Senior Lender. The Project Manager will be compensated by YSI for all services provided since the signing of the Pilot Contract. (c) The Commonwealth has entered into a contract with Public Consulting Group (“PCG”), to serve as the “Independent Validator,” and to be responsible for reviewing and confirming the findings of the Independent Evaluator made through the Expected Termination...
View Source
Evaluation Roles. DCFS has entered into a Ramp-Up Phase Evaluation Agreement with the University of Michigan dated September 2, 2015 (“Ramp-Up Evaluation
View Source
Evaluation Roles 
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Evaluation Roles

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Evaluations A. District management shall direct the evaluation of all permanent bargaining unit members no less than once every two years and probationary bargaining unit members no less than twice per year. Bargaining unit members who have been employed with VUSD for at least ten (10) years and whose previous evaluation rated the employee as meeting or exceeding standards, may be evaluated at least every five (5) years, if the administrative evaluator and certificated employee being evaluated agree. The certificated employee or the administrative evaluator may withdraw consent of this agreement at any time (EC 44664 (a) (3)). B. The written procedures for evaluations that are currently in effect shall be maintained by the District until the bargaining unit negotiates and ratifies new procedures. The present procedures are in Appendix A. They include: 1. The evaluator shall be an immediate supervisor or any other management or supervisory employee, who is designated by District management. 2. Bargaining unit members may utilize peer review in lieu of management evaluation with principal approval. 3. Those bargaining unit members who are regularly scheduled to be evaluated will be notified by the evaluator no later than October 1st of each school year. Such notice will contain a brief explanation as to the procedures for evaluations 4. One-half of the permanent staff will be formally evaluated each year. a. Pre-Conference Guidelines (for Temporary, Probationary and Permanent Bargaining Unit Members) 1. A pre-conference for bargaining unit members to be evaluated will be held by October 31. The purpose of the pre-conference is to review the Standards for Bargaining Unit Members assignment and to determine the evaluation focus. At that time the evaluator and the bargaining unit member may agree that some elements of the standards are not applicable (NA) to the employee’s assignment and may mark them NA at that time. 2. If there is disagreement about which of the elements is not applicable (NA), the parties may invite the Assistant Superintendent of Certificated Human Resources to assist in resolving the differences. The Assistant Superintendent shall recommend alternatives to the unit member and evaluator.

  • Evaluators The success of a program of evaluation depends upon a high level of skill and training of all participants in the process. The District shall provide annual training on the Colorado State Educator Evaluation System and ongoing training on inter-rater reliability using approved materials from the Colorado Department of Education. As required by Colorado law, all performance evaluations must be conducted by an individual who has completed a training in evaluation skills that has been approved by the Department of Education.