Evaluations of the Work Sample Clauses
The "Evaluations of the Work" clause establishes the right of one party, typically the client or project owner, to review, assess, and provide feedback on the work performed by the other party. This clause often outlines the process for submitting work for evaluation, the criteria or standards to be used, and the timeframe within which evaluations must occur. For example, it may require the contractor to deliver completed milestones for review, after which the client has a set number of days to approve or request revisions. The core function of this clause is to ensure quality control and alignment with expectations, helping to identify and address issues early in the project and prevent disputes over deliverables.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Evaluations of the Work. § 3.6.2.1 The Architect shall Engineer, as a representative of the Owner, will visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise required in Section 4.2.3, to become generally familiar with familiar with, and keep the Owner informed about, the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, to endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work, and to determine if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect Engineer shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect Engineer shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents, (2) known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Construction Manager, and (3) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work.
§ 3.6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to Engineer and the Owner will reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever the Architect Engineer considers it necessary or advisable, the Architect the Engineer and the Owner shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Architect the Engineer and the Owner nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Architect the Engineer or the Owner to the Construction Manager, Subcontractors, suppliers, their agents or employees, or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work.
§ 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, Engineer shall initially interpret matters concerning and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either both the Owner or and Construction Manager. The Architect’s Engineer’s response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness. If no agreement is made concerning the time within which interpretations requir...
Evaluations of the Work. § 3.6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine if the Work is with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaus inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Owner informed in writing of the progress and quality of the portion of the Work complete Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents and from the most recent constr
§ 3.6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents. If the Architect does not reject non-conforming work, the Architect shall demand in writing that the Contractor bring the non-conforming Work into compliance with the Contract Documents; and, if the Contractor’s efforts to do so are not begun and completed expeditiously, the Architect shall report that failure to the Owner in writing, stating: (a) the problem; (b) the reasons for the actions taken by the Architect; (c) what, if any, response has been forthcoming from
§ 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor. The Architect’s response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness.
§ 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the Architect shall be consistent with the requirements indicated in or reasonably inferable from the Contract Documents and shall be in writing or in the form of Drawings. Where approved in writing by the Owner in advance, the Architect’s decisions on matters relating to aesthetic effect shall be final if consistent with the intent expressed in the Contract Documents. To the extent the Contract Documents do not permit the Owner to make final decisions on aesthetic matters, then this Section shall be deemed modified by requiring the Architect to consult the Owner before making a decision on matters relating to aesthetic effect. To the extent that the Contract Documents permit the Owner to make final decisions on aesthetic matters, this Section shall be of no effect. This Section shall control over Section 4.2.13 in the General Conditions.
§ 3.6.2.5 Unless the Owner and Contractor designate another person to serve as an Initial Decision Maker, as that term is defined in AIA Document A...
Evaluations of the Work. § 3.6.2.1 The Engineer and its consultants shall visit the Project site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, to endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work, and to determine if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Engineer Parties shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, and as otherwise or also known to the Engineer, the Engineer shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner in writing (1) known or suspected deviations from the Contract Documents, (2) known or suspected deviations from the most recent construction schedule, (3) known or suspected defects and deficiencies observed in the Work, and (4) known or suspected errors, omissions, or inconsistencies in the Construction Documents.
§ 3.6.2.2 The Engineer has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents and to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed, or completed. However, neither this authority of the Engineer nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Engineer to the Contractor, Subcontractors, suppliers, their agents or employees, or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. Engineer shall advise and obtain the consent of Owner prior to rejecting any Work and prior to requiring any inspection or testing of the Work. If Engineer is to observe tests, inspections, or approvals required by the Contract Documents, Engineer will do so promptly and, where applicable, at the place of testing.
§ 3.6.2.3 The Engineer shall interpret and decide and advise with respect to matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor. The Engineer’s response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness.
§ 3.6.2.4 Interpretations and decisions of the...
Evaluations of the Work. § 3.6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise required in Section 4.2.3, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents,
Evaluations of the Work. The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise agreed to in writingrequired in Section 4.2.3, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work and to determine, if the Work is being performed in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents, (2) known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor, and (3) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work.
Evaluations of the Work. 2.6.2.1 The Design Consultant shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of the Contractor's operations, or as otherwise agreed by the Owner and the Design Consultant, (1) to observe all reasonably apparent conditions at the site and to keep the Owner informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, (2) to endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the Work, and (3) to determine in general if the Work is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Design Consultant shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. The Design Consultant shall neither have control over or charge of, nor be responsible for, the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, since these are solely the Contractor's rights and responsibilities under the Contract Documents. The Design Consultant shall prepare and submit notes of its observations to the Owner within five days after each site visit. The Design Consultant shall schedule, attend and chair all job meetings, which shall be held weekly unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents or mutually agreed by the Design Consultant, Owner and Contractor, and shall prepare and distribute minutes of each such meeting to the Owner, Contractor, Clerk of the Works if any, design consultants and others as appropriate not later than five days after the meeting. The Design Consultant shall secure the attendance at job meetings of Design Consultant's sub-design consultants and others as appropriate and as reasonably requested by the Owner.
2.6.2.2 The Design Consultant shall report to the Owner known deviations from the Contract Documents and from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor. However, the Design Consultant shall not be responsible for the Contractor's failure to perform the Work in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. The Design Consultant shall be responsible for the Design Consultant's negligent acts or omissions, but shall not have control over or charge of and shall not be responsible for acts or omissions of the Contractor, Subcontractors, or their agents or employees, or of any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work.
2.6.2.3 The Des...
Evaluations of the Work. § 3.6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of the Construction Manager’s operations (1) to inspect the progress, quantity and quality of the Work completed; (2) to reject any observed nonconforming Work; (3) to become familiar with and to keep the Owner informed about and on time; and (4) to document progress of the Work, in written and photographic form. Furthermore, a minimum of two job site meetings per month from commencement of construction through Final Completion will be initiated by the Construction Manager and attended by the Architect. Attendees will include Owner, the Construction Manager’s project manager and/or superintendent, Architect’s project representative, and Architect. Architect or his authorized representative will provide on-site observations prior to and during all concrete pours that contribute to the structural integrity of the building, including all pours of concrete piers, footings, grade beams, floor slabs, and concrete superstructure components, if applicable. In addition, Architect or his authorized representative will provide on-site observations prior to covering up or closing up of portions of the construction that, if covered, would conceal
§ 3.6.2.2 The Architect shall reject Work that, to the best of Architect’s knowledge, information, and belief, does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or advisable, the Architect will recommend to Owner additional inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Architect nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Architect to the Construction Manager, Subcontractors, suppliers, their agents or employees, or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. Architect shall promptly notify Owner and Construction Manager, orally and in writing, of any observed fault or defect in the Project or nonconformance with Contract Documents, upon discovery of the defect or nonconformance, and shall notify Owner of all corrective actions taken or recommended.
§ 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and make recommendations to Owner regarding matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner ...
Evaluations of the Work. 6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction (not less than one visit every other week) to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents, (2) known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor, and (3) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work.
6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or advisable, the Architect shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work in accordance with the provisions of the Contract Documents, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Architect nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Architect to the Contractor, Subcontractors, suppliers, their agents or employees, or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work.
6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor. The Architect’s response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon or otherwise with reasonable promptness.
Evaluations of the Work. 2.9.2.1 The Designer shall visit the site and attend construction progress meetings at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Construction Documents. However, the Designer shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Designer shall keep ACPS and the City reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and report to ACPS and/or the City (1) known deviations from the Construction Documents and from the most recent construction schedule, and (2) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work.
2.9.2.2 The Designer, while under contract to ACPS and the City, shall, after notification to ACPS and/or the City, have the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Construction Documents. Whenever the Designer considers it necessary or advisable, the Designer shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the Work by a certified third party firm in accordance with the provisions of the Construction Documents, whether or not such Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of the Designer nor a decision made in good faith either to exercise or not to exercise such authority shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Designer to the Contractor, or its subcontractors, material and equipment suppliers, their agents or employees or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work.
Evaluations of the Work. § 3.6.2.1 The Architect shall visit the site, as modified by Exhibit D, at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction, or as otherwise required in Section 4.2.3, to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and to determine, in general, if the Work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the Work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the Contract Documents. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site inspections or to review webcam/videos/photographs to check the quality or quantity of the Work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and promptly report to the Owner (1) known deviations from the Contract Documents, (2) known deviations from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor, and (3) defects and deficiencies observed in the Work.
§ 3.6.2.2 The Architect has the authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever the Architect considers it necessary or advisable, the Architect shall have the authority to require inspection or testing of the
§ 3.6.2.3 The Architect shall interpret and decide matters concerning performance under, and requirements of, the Contract Documents on written request of either the Owner or Contractor. The Architect’s response to such requests shall be made in writing within any time limits agreed upon by the Architect and the Owner or otherwise with reasonable promptness.