Common use of Exclusion Review Clause in Contracts

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider, Provider shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider CHN was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider CHN shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderCHN, Provider CHN shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA IA shall be whether Provider Arora was in in‌ material breach of this CIAIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider ▇▇▇▇▇ shall waive its his right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider▇▇▇▇▇, Provider ▇▇▇▇▇ shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.‌‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Lincare was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Lincare shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Provider Lincare shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA IA shall be whether Provider was in material breach of this CIAIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider shall waive its right to any notice of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider, Provider shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA IA shall be whether Provider Dia-Foot was in material breach of this CIAIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Dia-Foot shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderDia-Foot, Provider Dia-Foot shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider, Provider shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider SPD was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider SPD shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderSPD, Provider SPD shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider McKinsey shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Provider ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Vision Quest was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Vision Quest shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderVision Quest, Provider Vision Quest shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider CCH was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider CCH shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderCCH, Provider CCH shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Rockport was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Rockport shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderRockport, Provider Rockport shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA IA shall be whether Provider JSK was in material breach of this CIAIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider JSK shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderJSK, Provider JSK shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider PPOA was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider PPOA shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderPPOA, Provider PPOA shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider was the Parties were in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider The Parties shall waive its their right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Providerthe Parties, Provider the Parties shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider CII was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider CII shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderCII, Provider CII shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Renew was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Renew shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider▇▇▇▇▇, Provider ▇▇▇▇▇ shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider SNAP was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider SNAP shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderSNAP, Provider SNAP shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Lincare was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Lincare shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Provider Lincare shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Cigna was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Cigna shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderCigna, Provider Cigna shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider TEN was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider TEN shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderTEN, Provider TEN shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Rite Aid was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Rite Aid shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderRite Aid, Provider Rite Aid shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Flower Mound was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Flower Mound shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderFlower Mound, Provider Flower Mound shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.‌‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Gold Coast was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Gold Coast shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderGold Coast, Provider Gold Coast shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider SV/TC was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider SV/TC shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderSV/TC, Provider SV/TC shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Respironics was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Respironics shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderRespironics, Provider Respironics shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Edgewater was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Edgewater shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderEdgewater, Provider Edgewater shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Radeas was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Radeas shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderRadeas, Provider Radeas shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider GSMC was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider GSMC shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderGSMC, Provider GSMC shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Paksn was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Paksn shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderPaksn, Provider Paksn shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA IA shall be whether Provider was in material breach of this CIAIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider, Provider shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA IA shall be whether Provider was in material breach of this CIAIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider shall waive its right to any notice of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider, Provider shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA IA shall be whether Provider RAPHA was in material breach of this CIAIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider RAPHA shall waive its right to any notice of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderRAPHA, Provider RAPHA shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Essilor was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Essilor shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Provider ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA IA shall be whether Provider ▇▇▇▇▇ was in in‌ material breach of this CIAIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider ▇▇▇▇▇ shall waive its [his/her] right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of Provider▇▇▇▇▇, Provider ▇▇▇▇▇ shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Numotion was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Numotion shall waive its right to any notice of such an exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderNumotion, Provider Numotion shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether Provider Providence was in material breach of this CIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider Providence shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB DAB‌ finds in favor of ProviderProvidence, Provider Providence shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA IA shall be whether Provider OGCC was in material breach of this CIAIA. If the ALJ sustains the OIG’s determination of material breach, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the ALJ issues the decision. If the DAB finds in favor of OIG after an ALJ decision adverse to OIG, the exclusion shall take effect 20 days after the DAB decision. Provider OGCC shall waive its right to any notice by OIG of such an the exclusion if a decision upholding the exclusion is rendered by the ALJ or DAB. If the DAB finds in favor of ProviderOGCC, Provider OGCC shall be reinstated effective on the date of the original exclusion.‌exclusion.