Common use of Exclusion Review Clause in Contracts

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether SERA was in material breach of this CIA and, if so, whether:‌ a. SERA cured such breach within 30 days of its receipt of the Notice of Material Breach; or b. the alleged material breach could not have been cured within the 30 day period, but that, during the 30 day period following SERA’s receipt of the Notice of Material Breach: (i) SERA had begun to take action to cure the material breach; (ii) SERA pursued such action with due diligence; and (iii) SERA provided to OIG a reasonable timetable for curing the material breach.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether SERA Medstar was in material breach of this CIA and, if so, whether:‌ a. SERA Medstar cured such breach within 30 days of its receipt of the Notice of Material Breach; or b. the alleged material breach could not have been cured within the 30 day period, but that, during the 30 day period following SERAMedstar’s receipt of the Notice of Material Breach: (i) SERA Medstar had begun to take action to cure the material breach; (ii) SERA Medstar pursued such action with due diligence; and (iii) SERA Medstar provided to OIG a reasonable timetable for curing the material breach.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether SERA THM was in material breach of this CIA and, if so, whether:‌ a. SERA THM cured such breach within 30 days of its receipt of the Notice of Material Breach; or b. the alleged material breach could not have been cured within the 30 day period, but that, during the 30 day period following SERATHM’s receipt of the Notice of Material Breach: : (i) SERA THM had begun to take action to cure the material breach; (ii) SERA THM pursued such action with due diligence; and (iii) SERA provided to OIG a reasonable timetable for curing the material breach.THM

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether SERA Hospicio was in material breach of this CIA and, if so, whether:‌ a. SERA Hospicio cured such breach within 30 days of its receipt of the Notice of Material Breach; or b. the alleged material breach could not have been cured within the 30 day period, but that, during the 30 day period following SERAHospicio’s receipt of the Notice of Material Breach: : (i) SERA Hospicio had begun to take action to cure the material breach; (ii) SERA Hospicio pursued such action with due diligence; and (iii) SERA Hospicio provided to OIG a reasonable timetable for curing the material breach.

Exclusion Review. Notwithstanding any provision of Title 42 of the United States Code or Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the only issues in a proceeding for exclusion based on a material breach of this CIA shall be whether SERA Envision was in material breach of this CIA and, if so, whether:‌whether: a. SERA Envision cured such breach within 30 days of its receipt of the Notice of Material Breach; or b. the alleged material breach could not have been cured within the 30 day period, but that, during the 30 day period following SERAEnvision’s receipt of the Notice of Material Breach: : (i) SERA Envision had begun to take action to cure the material breach; (ii) SERA Envision pursued such action with due diligence; and (iii) SERA Envision provided to OIG a reasonable timetable for curing the material breach.