Final Ruling Sample Clauses

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Final Ruling. The Court has posted a ruling granting the motion for default judgment filed by the debtors [Calendar #19]. Accordingly, the status conference is unnecessary and hereby taken off calendar. No appearance is necessary. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Pro Se ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Rod (WJ) ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (TR) Pro Se Adv#: 6:17-01034 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Individually and as Trustee of t ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ FROM: S/C 5-4-17 Docket 1 - NONE LISTED - ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Pro Se ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Attorneys at Law Pro Se ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ (TR) Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Adv#: 6:17-01033 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ v. U.S. Department of Education et al FROM: S/C 5-4-17 Docket 1 - NONE LISTED - ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ U.S. Department of Education Pro Se The Student Loan Corporation Pro Se ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (TR) Pro Se Adv#: 6:17-01014 Frealy ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al FROM: 5-4-17 Docket 1 - NONE LISTED - ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
View SourceView Similar (2)
Final Ruling. This motion for relief from the automatic stay has been set for hearing on regular notice pursuant to Rule 9013-1(d)(2) of the Local Bankruptcy Rules. Pursuant to Rule 9013-1(h), the failure of the trustee, the debtor and other parties in interest to file written opposition at least fourteen days prior to the hearing is construed as consent to the granting of the motion. Cf. Ghazali ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995). Furthermore, because the court is granting the relief requested by the moving party and for which a prima facie case has been established, an actual hearing is not necessary. See ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇ (In re ▇▇▇▇▇▇), 468 F.3d 592, 602 (9th Cir. 2006). Parties who have been properly served with the motion are considered in default and, as a consequence, the matter will be resolved without oral argument. See Rule 9013-1(j)(3).
View SourceView Similar (27)
Final Ruling. No opposition has been filed. This application for compensation has been set for hearing on the notice required by LBR 2016-1(c)(4). No appearance is necessary. The Court thanks the trustee for his efforts in the case. Pursuant to the trustee's final report, the following administrative claims will be allowed:
View SourceView Similar (2)
Final Ruling. The Court has posted a ruling granting the motion for default judgment filed by the debtor [Calendar #23]. Accordingly, the status conference is unnecessary and hereby taken off calendar. No appearance is necessary. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ - INACTIVE - ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ U.S. BANK NATIONAL Pro Se ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Rod (WJ) ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (TR) Pro Se
View SourceView Similar (2)
Final Ruling. The Court has posted a ruling granting the motion for default judgment filed by the debtors [Calendar #17]. Accordingly, the status conference is unnecessary and hereby taken off calendar. No appearance is necessary. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Summer M ▇▇▇▇ JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Pro Se ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Summer M ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (TR) Pro Se Adv#: 6:19-01147 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ v. CIT BANK, N.A. formerly known as ONEWEST BANK FSB Docket 1 Tentative Ruling: 1/16/2020: None.
View Source
Final Ruling. In the event of any dispute as to whether a party has breached this Agreement pursuant to Section 7.3 above or whether a cure has been effected, the matter shall be submitted to litigation pursuant to Section 9 hereof, and there shall be no termination of the license under this Agreement unless and until there is a final ruling that there has been an uncured breach, as provided herein.
View Source
Final Ruling. The Court has posted a ruling granting the motion for default judgment filed by the debtors [Calendar #18]. Accordingly, the status conference is unnecessary and hereby taken off calendar. No appearance is necessary. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ CIT BANK, N.A. formerly known Pro Se ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (TR) Pro Se Adv#: 6:19-01146 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Chapter 7 Trustee ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al Docket 1 - NONE LISTED - Windsor Holdings, LLC Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Pro Se New Grand Senior Living, LLC Pro Se Windsor Business Solutions, Ltd. Pro Se ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Chapter 7 Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (TR) Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Adv#: 6:19-01142 SCHOOLSFIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ - NONE LISTED - ▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇. Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ - SUSPENDED BK - ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇. Pro Se ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ - SUSPENDED BK - ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ SCHOOLSFIRST FEDERAL Represented By ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (TR) Pro Se Adv#: 6:19-01150 Meng et ▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇ et al Docket 1 - NONE LISTED - ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Pro Se ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Pro Se ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Represented By ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (TR) Pro Se Adv#: 6:19-01145 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ et ▇▇ ▇. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Docket 14 Tentative Ruling: 1/16/2020: None.
View Source
Final Ruling. The motion is untimely. Section 362(c)(3)(A) provides that the automatic stay “shall terminate with respect to the debtor on the 30th day after the filing of the later case.” See 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(A). In order to avoid the termination of the stay, a motion to extend the stay must be filed and it must be heard on or before the thirtieth day after the filing of the bankruptcy case. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3)(B) (stating that “on the motion of a party in interest for continuation of the automatic stay and upon notice and a hearing, the court may extend the stay in particular cases as to any or all creditors (subject to such conditions or limitations as the court may then impose) after notice and a hearing completed before the expiration of the 30-day period ”). Accordingly, under the plain language of the statute, the hearing regarding a motion to extend the automatic stay pursuant to section 362(c)(3)(B) must occur no later than thirty days after the filing of this bankruptcy case. It is not enough to simply file the motion within the thirty day period. The hearing regarding the motion must also occur within the thirty day period. See, e.g., In re Moon, 339 B.R. 668, 670 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2006) (denying a motion to extend the stay that was filed during the thirty day period because the debtors scheduled the motion for a hearing thirty- seven days after the petition date); In re ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 357 B.R. 128, 131 (Bankr. C.D. Ill.
View Source

Related to Final Ruling

  • IRS IRS shall mean the Internal Revenue Service.

  • Tax Ruling The Assuming Institution shall not at any time, without the Receiver’s prior written consent, seek a private letter ruling or other determination from the Internal Revenue Service or otherwise seek to qualify for any special tax treatment or benefits associated with any payments made by the Receiver pursuant to this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement.

  • Tax Rulings Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has requested or is the subject of or bound by any private letter ruling, technical advice memorandum, or similar ruling or memorandum with any taxing authority with respect to any material Taxes, nor is any such request outstanding.

  • Advance Rulings 1. Each Party, through its customs administration or other relevant authorities, to the extent permitted by its domestic laws, regulations and administrative determinations, on the application of a person described in Paragraph 2(a), shall provide in writing advance rulings in respect of the tariff classification, questions arising from the application of the principles of the Agreement on Customs Valuation and/or origin of goods. 2. Where available, each Party shall adopt or maintain procedures for advance rulings, which shall: (a) provide that an importer in its territory or an exporter or producer in the territory of another Party may apply for an advance ruling before the importation of the goods in question; (b) require that an applicant for an advance ruling provide a detailed description of the goods and all relevant information needed to process an application for an advance ruling; (c) provide that its customs administration may, at any time during the course of an evaluation of an application for an advance ruling, request that the applicant provide additional information within a specified period; (d) provide that any advance ruling be based on the facts and circumstances presented by the applicant, and any other relevant information in the possession of the decision-maker; and (e) provide that an advance ruling be issued to the applicant expeditiously, within the period specified in each Party's domestic laws, regulations or administrative determinations. 3. A Party may reject requests for an advance ruling where the additional information requested by it in accordance with Paragraph 2(c) is not provided within the specified period. 4. Subject to Paragraphs 1 and 5 and where available, each Party shall apply an advance ruling to all importations of goods described in that ruling imported into its territory for three years from the date of that ruling, or such other period as specified in that Party's domestic laws, regulations or administrative determinations. 5. A Party may modify or revoke an advance ruling upon a determination that the ruling was based on an error of fact or law (including human error), the information provided is false or inaccurate, if there is a change in domestic law consistent with this Agreement, or there is a change in a material fact or circumstance on which the ruling is based. 6. Where an importer claims that the treatment accorded to an imported good should be governed by an advance ruling, the customs administration may evaluate whether the facts and circumstances of the importation are consistent with the facts and circumstances upon which an advance ruling was based.

  • Franchise Tax Certification If PROVIDER is a taxable entity subject to the Texas Franchise Tax (Chapter 171, Texas Tax Code), then PROVIDER certifies that it is not currently delinquent in the payment of any franchise (margin) taxes or that PROVIDER is exempt from the payment of franchise (margin) taxes.