Common use of General Warning Requirements Clause in Contracts

General Warning Requirements. Consistent with Section 2.1 above, nothing in this Section requires PGF to place any labels or warnings on the Products that are otherwise in compliance with the requirements of Proposition 65. Nor does this Section broaden the obligations to PGF under Proposition 65. To the extent that any Product provided for sale in California does not comply with Proposition 65’s maximum allowable lead level through formulation or reformulation, PGF agrees to provide a clear and reasonable warning in accordance with this Section pursuant to Title 27 of California Code of Regulations section 25600, et seq. Each warning shall be prominently placed with such conspicuousness as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices, as to render it likely to be read and understood by an ordinary individual under customary conditions before purchase or use and shall be provided in a manner such that it is clearly associated with the specific Product to which the warning applies. In so labeling any such Product, PGF may elect — but is not required — to use the following Proposition 65 compliant warning affixed to the packaging label, tag, or directly to each such Product:

General Warning Requirements. Consistent with Section 2.1 above, nothing in this Section requires PGF to place any labels or warnings on the Products that are otherwise in compliance with the requirements of Proposition 65. Nor does this Section broaden the obligations to PGF under Proposition 65. To the extent that any Covered Product provided for sale in California does not comply with Proposition 65’s maximum allowable exposes consumers to more than 0.5 micrograms of lead level through formulation or reformulationas calculated in section 2 above, PGF agrees to provide a clear and reasonable warning in accordance with this Section pursuant to Title 27 of California Code of Regulations section 25600, et seq. Each warning shall be prominently placed with such conspicuousness as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices, as to render it likely to be read and understood by an ordinary individual under customary conditions before purchase or use and shall be provided in a manner such that it is clearly associated with the specific Product to which the warning applies. In so labeling any such ProductCovered Products, PGF may elect — but is not required — to must use one of the following Proposition 65 compliant warning affixed to the packaging label, tag, or directly to each such Covered Product:.

General Warning Requirements. Consistent with Section 2.1 above, nothing in this Section requires PGF STRUMBA to place any labels or warnings on the Products that are otherwise in compliance with the requirements of Proposition 65. Nor does this Section broaden the obligations to PGF STRUMBA under Proposition 65. To the extent that any Product provided for sale in California does not comply with Proposition 65’s maximum allowable exposes consumers to more than 0.5 micrograms of lead level through formulation or reformulationper day as calculated in Section 2 above, PGF ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ agrees to provide a clear and reasonable warning in accordance with this Section pursuant to Title 27 of California Code of Regulations section 25600, et seqseq (the “Warning”). Each warning The Warning shall be prominently placed with such conspicuousness as compared with other words, statements, designs, or devices, as to render it likely to be read and understood by an ordinary individual under customary conditions before purchase or use and shall be provided in a manner such that it is clearly associated with the specific Product to which the warning applies. In so labeling any such Product, PGF may elect — but is not required — to STRUMBA must use one of the following Proposition 65 compliant warning affixed to the packaging label, tag, or directly to each such Product: