GRANTEE PERFORMANCE Clause Samples

GRANTEE PERFORMANCE. HUD will judge performance based upon whether the Grantee achieves the agreed upon activities within grant time limits and within budget and whether the Grantee has produced tangible results through the execution of grant activities.

GRANTEE PERFORMANCE. HUD will judge performance based upon whether the Grantee achieves the agreed upon activities within grant time limits and within budget and whether the Grantee has produced tangible results through the implementation of grant activities. All PHA FSS programs must report activities of their FSS enrollment, progress, and exit activities of their FSS program participants through required submissions of the form HUD-50058 at least annually. HUD’s assessment of the accomplishments of the FSS programs of PHAs funded under this NOFO will be based primarily on PIC/HIP system data obtained from forms HUD-50058, HUD-50058-MTW, and HUD-50058-MTW-Expansion. All PBRA programs must report at least annually via the Multifamily FSS Reporting Tool. HUD requires submission of racial and ethnic data and form (HUD-27061-H) that is often used for that purpose. PBRA properties with FSS programs must submit form HUD-27061-H to their Grant Specialist. For PH and HCV programs, the HUD-50058, HUD-50058-MTW, and HUD-50058-MTW-Expansion forms, which provide racial and ethnic data to HUD’s PIC/HIP data system, are comparable program forms that must be submitted annually instead of the HUD-27061-H by PHAs for reporting racial and ethnic data for FSS program participants. See Notice PIH 2016-08, and any subsequent amendments to the notice, for information on FSS reporting requirements in PIC. A series of webcast trainings on the provisions of PIH 2016-08 was published on August 12, 2016. Also note that HUD updated the warnings and fatal edits related to FSS PIC reporting. All of the preceding documents and information can be found on the FSS Resources webpage Voucher Management System (VMS). Due to the combined funding streams starting with the FY 2014 FSS NOFO, PHAs must not use VMS to report HCV FSS coordinator expenses for funds made available under the Funding Notice, and this Grant Agreement. PHAs must continue to enter the amount of HCV FSS escrow deposits and HCV FSS escrow forfeitures into VMS for all funds made available. Also note that amounts expended in excess of the FSS grant for costs associated with the administration of the FSS program which are allocated to the HCV program including the FSS coordinator's salary and benefits as well as additional eligible costs such as office space, computer costs, office supplies, etc. must be reported in VMS as administrative expenses. PHAs with an FSS program serving both PH and HCV families with costs not chargeable to funds awarded...

GRANTEE PERFORMANCE. 1. GRANTEE shall conduct, in a satisfactory manner as determined by CITY, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, hereinafter referred to as "HUD," and the office of the Governor, hereinafter referred to as "State Agency," an Empowerment Zone Project, hereinafter referred to as the "EZ Project" or "Program" pursuant to Subchapter U of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended by Section 952 of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 (26 U.S.C. 1391 through 1397F, et seq.), hereinafter referred to as the "Act"; and the applicable provisions of Title 24 CFR Part

GRANTEE PERFORMANCE. The Grantee and its rural economic development program will be evaluated biannually by the Department for performance under this Agreement. Satisfactory performance will be required for future awards.

GRANTEE PERFORMANCE. 1. The State will be the sole judge of the acceptability of all work performed and all work products produced by the Grantee as a result of this Scope of Work, Exhibit A. Should the work performed, or the products produced by the Grantee fail to meet minimum State conditions, requirements or other applicable standards, specifications, or guidelines, the following resolution process will be employed except as superseded by other binding processes. 2. The State will notify the Grantee in writing within five (5) State business days of receiving service of any acceptance problems by identifying the specific inadequacies and/or failures in the services performed and/or the products produced by the Grantee. 3. The Grantee will, within five (5) State business days after initial problem notification, respond to the State by submitting a detailed explanation describing precisely how the identified services and/or products adhere to and satisfy all applicable requirements, and/or a proposed corrective action plan to address the specific inadequacies and/or failures in the identified services and/or products. 4. The State will, within five (5) State business days after receipt of the Grantee’s detailed explanation and/or proposed corrective action plan, notify the Grantee in writing whether it accepts or rejects the explanation and/or plan. If the State rejects the explanation and/or plan, the Grantee will submit a revised corrective action plan within three (3) State business days of notification of rejection. 5. The State will, within three (3) State business days of receipt of the revised corrective action plan, notify the Grantee in writing whether it accepts or rejects the revised corrective action plan proposed by the Grantee.

GRANTEE PERFORMANCE. 10 HUD will judge performance based upon whether the Grantee achieves the agreed upon 11 activities within grant time limits and within budget and whether the Grantee has produced 12 tangible results through the implementation of grant activities. 13 14 Program Coordinator. See the FY2020 FSS NOFA for a sample position description of an 15 FSS Program Coordinator. 16