History of Performance Clause Samples

History of Performance. Note that while an organization’s history of performance on USAID awards should be a factor in determining the level of risk, a history of receiving grants from USAID does not guarantee that there is no risk in providing funds to an organization. Changes in personnel, accounting practices, or financial status may affect an organization’s performance on a new award.‌

History of Performance. If the applicant has previously obtained Federal financial assistance award, it has never failed to materially comply with the Federal award terms and conditions and further has never had an award terminated on that basis. Submission of an application constitutes certification that an applicant meets these standards (items a. through c. above). The agency may request documentation to substantiate the certification. Based on risk assessment, the agency may impose specific award conditions in accordance with 2 CFR 200.208.

History of Performance. Using the form attached (Exhibit B) provide summaries of up to six (6) projects (including up to three (3) recent projects for the District, as applicable) completed by your company in the past ten years that are similar to the Scope of Work described in this RFP. For each project summary please provide the project name and client, a description of the scope of work, and a description of your role in the lifecycle of the project. If applicable, please specify if the project was a K-12 school project and/or conducted under Education Code Section 17406 et seq. (i.e., a Lease-Leaseback project). Provide examples of more than one owner to the extent possible. Describe your specific experience with K-12 public school projects conducted under Education Code Section 17406 et seq. (i.e., Lease-Leaseback projects). Describe your specific experience with projects subject to review and approval by the Division of the State Architect (“DSA”), and further describe your general approach to working with DSA field inspectors to obtain necessary approvals. Describe your general approach to ensuring that projects are completed on time and within budget. Describe your company’s general approach to providing high-quality construction services. Describe your company’s approach to being proactive when problems arise on a project. Additionally, please provide a detailed description of a situation where your company avoided or mitigated a significant issue on a project (i.e., delay, cost increase, non-performing subcontractor, etc.). Describe your company’s general approach to managing a project within the contract price, including specific methods to mitigate or avoid change orders and cost increases. Has your company ever failed to enter into a contract after being selected for a new school construction or modernization project? If yes, please explain. In the past five years, has your company failed to complete a contract within the authorized contract time? If yes, please explain. In the past five years, has your company’s contract on a public works project been terminated or canceled by the public entity owner? If yes, please explain. In the past five years, has your company contracted on a public works project subject to a Project Labor Agreement? If yes, please explain.

History of Performance. Under 2 C.F.R 200.206, any Federal awarding agency may consider the Recipient’s performance under this agreement when evaluating the risks of making a future Federal financial assistance award to the Recipient.‌

History of Performance. Reports and findings from audits.