Implications for PrEP & nPEP Clause Samples

Implications for PrEP & nPEP. Participants indicated a deep sense of distrust of government and medical institutions in the U.S. Information from this research regarding misconceptions about PrEP is consistent with a recent article published by ▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2014). They stated that PrEP uptake will be slow until knowledge becomes widely known in the MSM community and general population. Results from Philadelphia participants mirror these predictions. While participants felt apprehensive about the efficacy of PrEP, they seemed interested in wanting more information. ▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. (2015) found similar attitudes around uptake and adherence to PrEP. In their study, there was an incomplete understanding about what PrEP is, skepticism regarding HIV prevention and its potential short and long-term side effects. Rectifying assumptions about PrEP represents a crucial opportunity for public health officials to engage the community about its potential, especially YBMSM who may be less exposed to health messages regarding PrEP. It is important these messages stress the potential of PrEP as an effective HIV prevention method for this target population, as they are the group that would most benefit from multiple prevention methods. Furthermore, participants in this study expressed a need for more protective options other than condoms, giving PrEP the necessary leverage in this target population. Messaging should try to normalize PrEP and promptly address perceived barriers such as cost, accessibility and eligibility. Condoms have been the primary prevention message and the development of PrEP introduces an entirely new concept in preventing HIV. It is unsurprising there is skepticism regarding this advancement, however, stressing the benefits of PrEP and clarifying misconceptions is critical in uptake for YBMSM. Health care providers at public health clinics, especially STD clinics, are in a unique position to have discussions about PrEP. Discussing PrEP with a family doctor may lead to awkward conversations about unprotected sex and sexual behavior. However a specialist in STDs/HIV may be able to have more open conversations with the target population about risk taking and the importance of PrEP as another prevention tool. This study also reveals important insights on the use of nPEP. The majority of participants felt that nPEP was better biomedical option for HIV prevention; it was cited as more convenient and conducive to their sexual behavior and perceived risk of HIV. While...

Related to Implications for PrEP & nPEP

  • Settlement and Recovery of Funding for Prior Years (a) The HSP acknowledges that settlement and recovery of Funding can occur up to 7 years after the provision of Funding. (b) Recognizing the transition of responsibilities from the MOHLTC to the LHIN, the HSP agrees that if the parties are directed in writing to do so by the MOHLTC, the LHIN will settle and recover funding provided by the MOHLTC to the HSP prior to the transition of the Funding for the Services to the LHIN, provided that such settlement and recovery occurs within 7 years of the provision of the funding by the MOHLTC. All such settlements and recoveries will be subject to the terms applicable to the original provision of Funding.

  • Statewide HUB Program Statewide Procurement Division Note: In order for State agencies and institutions of higher education (universities) to be credited for utilizing this business as a HUB, they must award payment under the Certificate/VID Number identified above. Agencies, universities and prime contractors are encouraged to verify the company’s HUB certification prior to issuing a notice of award by accessing the Internet (▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/tpasscmblsearch/index.jsp) or by contacting

  • INDEPENDENT SINGLE OR PROGRAM-SPECIFIC AUDIT If Grantee, within ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s fiscal year, expends a total amount of at least $750,000 in federal funds awarded, Grantee shall have a single audit or program-specific audit in accordance with 2 CFR 200. The $750,000 federal threshold amount includes federal funds passed through by way of state agency awards. If Grantee, within ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s fiscal year, expends a total amount of at least $750,000 in state funds awarded, Grantee must have a single audit or program-specific audit in accordance with TxGMS, State of Texas Single Audit Circular. The audit must be conducted by an independent certified public accountant and in accordance with 2 CFR 200 Government Auditing Standards, and TxGMS. For-profit Grantees whose expenditures meet or exceed the federal or state expenditure thresholds stated above shall follow the guidelines in 2 CFR 200 or TxGMS, as applicable, for their program-specific audits. Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) Single Audit Services will notify Grantee to complete the Single Audit Determination Form. If Grantee fails to complete the Single Audit Determination Form within 30 calendar days after notification by HHSC Single Audit Services to do so, then Grantee shall be subject to the DFPS sanctions and remedies for non-compliance with this Contract. Each Grantee that is required to obtain a single audit must competitively re-procure single audit services once every six years. Grantee shall procure audit services in compliance with this section and state procurement procedures as well as with the provisions of TxGMS.

  • Certification Regarding Entire TIPS Agreement for Part 1 and Part 2 Contracts 5 This is a two part solicitation. Part 1 is solicited for TIPS sales that are not considered a "public work" construction (1) The TIPS solicitation document resulting in the Agreement; (2) Any addenda or clarifications issued in relation to the corresponding TIPS solicitation; (3) All solicitation information provided to Vendor by TIPS through the TIPS eBid System; (3) Vendor’s entire proposal response to the corresponding TIPS solicitation including all accepted required attachments, acknowledged notices and certifications, accepted negotiated terms, accepted pricing, accepted responses to questions, and accepted written clarifications of Vendor’s proposal, and; any properly included attachments to the TIPS Contract. Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees TIPS Members often turn to TIPS Contracts for ease of use and to receive discounted pricing. Vendor must respond with a percentage from 0%-100%. The percentage discount that you input below will be applied to your Part 1 "Catalog Pricing", as defined in the solicitation, for all TIPS Sales made during the life of the contract. You cannot alter this percentage discount once the solicitation legally closes. You will always be required to discount every TIPS Sale by the percentage included below with the exception of limited goods/services specifically identified and excluded from this discount in Vendor’s original proposal. If you add goods or services to your "Catalog Pricing" during the life of the contract, you will be required to sell those new items with this discount applied.

  • Treatment of Unallowable Costs Previously Submitted for Payment Defendants further agree that within 90 days of the Effective Date of this Agreement they shall identify to applicable Medicare and TRICARE fiscal intermediaries, carriers, and/or contractors, and Medicaid and FEHBP fiscal agents, any Unallowable Costs (as defined in this paragraph) included in payments previously sought from the United States, or any State Medicaid program, including, but not limited to, payments sought in any cost reports, cost statements, information reports, or payment requests already submitted by Defendants or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates, and shall request, and agree, that such cost reports, cost statements, information reports, or payment requests, even if already settled, be adjusted to account for the effect of the inclusion of the Unallowable Costs. Defendants agree that the United States, at a minimum, shall be entitled to recoup from Defendants any overpayment plus applicable interest and penalties as a result of the inclusion of such Unallowable Costs on previously-submitted cost reports, information reports, cost statements, or requests for payment. Any payments due after the adjustments have been made shall be paid to the United States pursuant to the direction of the Department of Justice and/or the affected agencies. The United States reserves its rights to disagree with any calculations submitted by Defendants or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates on the effect of inclusion of Unallowable Costs (as defined in this paragraph) on Defendants or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates’ cost reports, cost statements, or information reports.