In ▇ Sample Clauses
In ▇. ▇▇▇, et al. (Eds.). Singapore: The encyclopedia. Singapore: Editions ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇; National Heritage Board, p. 585. (Call no.: RSING 959.57003 SIN-[HIS]); Singapore. Parliament. Parliamentary debates: Official report. (2003, January 25). Annex B: The Tebrau and Scudai Rivers Water Agreement between the Johore State Government and the City Council of Singapore signed on 1 September 1961 (Vol. 75). Singapore: [s.n], cols. 2609–2610. (Call no.: RSING 328.5957 SIN). Retrieved 2016, August 11 from Parliament of Singapore website: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/search/resource/NonPDF/2003/20030125/20030125-HA-0752605.pdf 12. Water agreements. (2006).
In ▇. ▇▇▇, et al. (Eds.). Singapore: The encyclopedia. Singapore: Editions ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇; National Heritage Board, p. 585. (Call no.: RSING 959.57003 SIN-[HIS]); Singapore. Parliament. Parliamentary debates: Official report. (2003, January 25). Annex D: Agreement between the Government of the State of Johore and the Public Utilities Board of the Republic of Singapore signed on 24 November 1990 (Vol. 75). Singapore: [s.n], cols. 2675–2676. (Call no.: RSING 328.5957 SIN). Retrieved 2016, August 11 from Parliament of Singapore website: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/search/resource/NonPDF/2003/20030125/20030125-HA-0752665.pdf; ▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. (1990, November 25). S'pore, Johor sign new water pact. The Straits Times, p. 1. Retrieved from NewspaperSG. 33. Singapore. Parliament. Parliamentary debates: Official report. (2003, January 25). Annex D: Agreement between the Government of the State of Johore and the Public Utilities Board of the Republic of Singapore signed on 24 November 1990 (Vol. 75). Singapore: [s.n], cols. 2697–2699. (Call no.: RSING 328.5957 SIN). Retrieved 2016, August 11 from Parliament of Singapore website: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/search/resource/NonPDF/2003/20030125/20030125-HA-0752665.pdf; ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2003, February 4). Resource traded for over 70 years. The Straits Times, p. 6. Retrieved from NewspaperSG. 34. Singapore. Parliament. Parliamentary debates: Official report. (2003, January 25). Annex D: Agreement between the Government of the State of Johore and the Public Utilities Board of the Republic of Singapore signed on 24 November 1990 (Vol. 75). Singapore: [s.n], cols. 2669–2670. (Call no.: RSING 328.5957 SIN). Retrieved 2016, August 11 from Parliament of Singapore website: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/search/resource/NonPDF/2003/20030125/20030125-HA-0752665.pdf; ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. (1988, June 29). Landmark deal, says PM ▇▇▇. The Straits Times, p. 1; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. (1995, February 25). Singapore's water: History, politics and future options. The Straits Times, p. 33. Retrieved from NewspaperSG. 35. ▇▇▇, Y. S., ▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., & ▇▇▇, ▇. (2009). Ensuring water sustainability: The supply side. In Clean, green and blue: Singapore's journey towards environmental and water sustainability. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, p. 140. (Call no.: RSING 363.70095957 TAN); ▇▇, ▇. (2011, September 1). 1961 water pact ends, handover on good terms. Today, p. 3. Retrieved from NewspaperSG. 36. ▇▇▇, L.-A. (2003, February 9). Govt assurance on long-term water supply. The Straits Times, ...
In ▇. ▇▇▇, et al. (Eds.). Singapore: The encyclopedia. Singapore: Editions ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇; National Heritage Board, p. 585. (Call no.: RSING 959.57003 SIN-[HIS]) 23. Water agreements. (2006).
In ▇. ▇▇▇, et al. (Eds.). Singapore: The encyclopedia. Singapore: Editions ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇; National Heritage Board, p. 585. (Call no.: RSING 959.57003 SIN-[HIS]); Singapore. Parliament. Parliamentary debates: Official report. (2003, January 25). Annex A: The Agreement as to Certain Water Rights in Johore between the Sultan of Johore and the Municipal Commissioners of the Town of Singapore signed on 5 December 1927 (Extracted from Administration Report of the Singapore Municipality for the Year 1927) (Vol. 75). Singapore: [s.n], cols. 2597–2598. (Call no.: RSING 328.5957 SIN). Retrieved 2016, August 11 from Parliament of Singapore website: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/search/resource/NonPDF/2003/20030125/20030125-HA-0752585.pdf; ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2003, February 4). Resource traded for over 70 years. The Straits Times, p. 6. Retrieved from NewspaperSG. 7. Singapore. Parliament. Parliamentary debates: Official report. (2003, January 25). Annex A: The Agreement as to Certain Water Rights in Johore between the Sultan of Johore and the Municipal Commissioners of the Town of Singapore signed on 5 December 1927 (Extracted from Administration Report of the Singapore Municipality for the Year 1927) (Vol. 75). Singapore: [s.n], cols. 2597–2598. (Call no.: RSING 328.5957 SIN). Retrieved 2016, August 11 from Parliament of Singapore website: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/search/resource/NonPDF/2003/20030125/20030125-HA-0752585.pdf 8. Water agreements. (2006).
In ▇. ▇▇▇, et al. (Eds.). Singapore: The encyclopedia. Singapore: Editions ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇; National Heritage Board, p. 585. (Call no.: RSING 959.57003 SIN-[HIS]); ▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇, P. O. (2009). Singapore's perspective on economic relations with Malaysia. In ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Ed.). Across the causeway: A multi-dimensional study of Malaysia-Singapore relations. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, p. 261. (Call no.: RSING 327.59505957 ACR) 24. Water agreements. (2006).
In ▇. ▇▇▇, 3 ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Eds.), Understanding Counterinsurgency. London: Routledge, p. 29. 985 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (1995). British Counterinsurgency in the Post-Imperial Era: War, Armed Forces and Society. Manchester: Manchester University Press, p. 146. 986 ▇▇▇▇, Soup with a Knife, p. 192-198. 987 Ucko and Egnell. Counterinsurgency in Crisis, p. 24-26. 988 ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ (2011). The Myth of British Minimum Force in Counterinsurgency Campaigns during Decolonisation (1945– 1970). Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(2), p. 247-249. 989 See for instance ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ (2018). ‘Devils that suck the blood of the Malayan People’: The Case for Post-Revisionist Analysis of Counter-insurgency Violence. War in History, 25(2), p. 222-224; ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2007). The Other Side of the COIN: Minimum and Exemplary Force in British Army Counterinsurgency in Kenya. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 18(4), p. 647-651. 990 Ucko and Egnell. Counterinsurgency in Crisis, p. 29 corps.991 Between the various infantry and cavalry regiments there existed some informal stratification and intense rivalry.992 Some peace time aspects of this regimental identity, such as mess-rules and dress uniforms are seemingly archaic and have little relevance for performance on operations.993 Still, this sense of shared identity is regarded as fostering unit cohesion, which is of course essential on operations and during combat.994 When units are deployed on operations, this regimental, and sub-unit cohesion is often reinforced by the concept of “mission command” that combines centralized intent and decentralized execution and promotes initiative on lower tactical levels. Of course, mission command is familiar to most Western militaries. However, as ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ shows, in Northern Ireland the combination of strong regimental identity and decentralized execution of operations can produce disparate results when the intent is ambiguous or not properly enforced.995 A further potential pitfall of the strong British regimental system with its intraservice rivalries was the regiment was the prime conduit of information and experience. Not only could this impede formal learning processes across the army, but it also made it more difficult to enforce change that went against the grain of the institutions.996 As such, the British Army entered the 21st century predominantly focused on conventional warfare, despite an apparent knack for irregular conflicts. Although the counterinsurgency experiences were not at the forefront of military tho...
In ▇. ▇▇▇, et al. (Eds.). Singapore: The encyclopedia. Singapore: Editions ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇; National Heritage Board, p. 585. (Call no.: RSING 959.57003 SIN-[HIS]); ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2003, February 4). Resource traded for over 70 years. The Straits Times, p. 6. Retrieved from NewspaperSG.
In ▇. ▇▇▇.Apollo I 25, a renunciation contract for monastery property, a monk from the Hermopolite monastery of Apa Apollo, renounces one of his two plots to the dikaion of the monastery through Apa ▇▇▇▇▇▇, the archimandrite. As monks were liable to pay taxes (demosion) on their property (P.Mon.Apollo I, p. 19-20, 23-24), financial problems might force a return of the property to the monastery which could then assign it to someone else (cf. ▇.▇▇▇.Apollo I 25-26; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, pp. 205-212). The current document preserves the agreement by the issuing party, brother ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (l. 3), probably a monk of the monastery, and a deacon (l. 4), followed by three witness subscriptions (ll. 5-7). The most interesting feature of the subscriptions to this contract is the mention of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ as one of the witnesses (l. 5). His witness signature contains the short name ▇▇▇▇ written in the well-known hand of a beginner, which gets extended to the full name ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ by someone else. This is the “father” who is known to have signed a large number of orders and receipts of the Hermopolite monastery of Apa Apollo between the eleventh to the fourteenth indiction years (see ▇.▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, p. 35; ▇.▇▇▇▇.Bawit 26). Since the exact position of Keri is not mentioned in any of the other documents, it has been suggested that he may not have been the superior of the monastery after all, but just the main authority of a subdivision of the monastery, see ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ‘Micro- and Macro-Management Responsibilities of the Head of the Monastery of Apa Apollo at Bawit’, pp. 689-691. In our document, however, the same person is referred to as ⲙⲟⲛⲟⲭⲟⲥ “monk”, ἀποπροεστώς “former superior” and ⲡⲉϥ̣ⲓⲱⲧ “father” (see n. to l. 5). The document may be dated to the fifth year of the following indiction cycle, which shows that ▇▇▇▇ had been the head of the monastery previously and that after completing his service he might have returned to his status as a monk in the monastery, while keeping his title “father”.
In ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Books14, Chief Justice ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ defined the purpose of section 2(a) of the 11 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 [“Charter”], CMDS BOA, Tab 11.
In ▇. ▇▇▇, et al. (Eds.). Singapore: The encyclopedia. Singapore: Editions ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇; National Heritage Board, p. 585. (Call no.: RSING 959.57003 SIN-[HIS]); ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. (2003, February 4). Resource traded for over 70 years. The Straits Times, p. 6. Retrieved from NewspaperSG. 2. ▇▇▇, L.-A. (2003, February 9). Govt assurance on long-term water supply. The Straits Times, p.1. Retrieved from NewspaperSG; ▇▇▇, ▇., & ▇▇▇, P. O. (2009). Singapore's perspective on economic relations with Malaysia. In ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (Ed.). Across the causeway: A multi-dimensional study of Malaysia-Singapore relations. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, pp. 257–258. (Call no.: RSING 327.59505957 ACR) 3. ▇▇▇, L.-A. (2003, February 9). Govt assurance on long-term water supply. The Straits Times, p. 1. Retrieved from NewspaperSG.