Intentional Interference Sample Clauses

The Intentional Interference clause is designed to prohibit parties from deliberately disrupting or hindering the contractual rights or business relationships of the other party. In practice, this clause applies to actions such as inducing a third party to breach a contract, interfering with ongoing negotiations, or otherwise intentionally causing harm to the business interests protected by the agreement. Its core function is to safeguard the parties from willful misconduct that could undermine the benefits of the contract, thereby promoting fair dealing and reducing the risk of harmful interference.
Intentional Interference. Interfering with the proper functioning of any System, including any deliberate attempt to overload a system by mail bombing, news bombing, broadcast attacks, or flooding techniques.
View SourceView Similar (9)
Intentional Interference. Interfering with the proper functioning of the Wasabi Storage Platform, including any deliberate attempt to overload a system by mail bombing, news bombing, broadcast attacks, or flooding techniques.
View Source
Intentional Interference. Since Transport made an offer to do Carrier’s job at a lower price, and was aware of the Carrier K, it also knew its act would potentially interfere with that of K.
View Source
Intentional Interference. Interference with service to any user, host or network including, without limitation, mail bombing, news bombing, other flooding techniques, deliberate attempts to overload a system, broadcast attacks and any activity resulting in the crash of a host. Intentional interference also means the use of any kind of program/script/command, or sending messages of any kind, designed to interfere with a user’s terminal session, via any means, locally or by the Internet.
View Source

Related to Intentional Interference

  • Negligent Fire A “Negligent Fire” is a fire caused by negligence or fault of Purchaser’s Opera- tions, including, but not limited to, one caused by smoking by persons engaged in Purchaser’s Operations during the course of their employment, or during rest or lunch peri- ods; or if Purchaser’s failure to comply with the require- ments of BT7.2 and BT7.3 results in a fire starting or permits a fire to spread. Damages and the cost of sup- pressing Negligent Fires shall be borne by Purchaser.

  • Infringement 7.1 GENERAL will protect its PATENT RIGHTS and JOINT PATENT RIGHTS from infringement and prosecute infringers when, in its sole judgement, such action may be reasonably necessary, proper and justified. 7.2 If CEREBROTEC shall have supplied GENERAL with written evidence demonstrating to GENERAL'S reasonable satisfaction prima facie infringement of a claim of a PATENT RIGHT in the LICENSE FIELD by a third party, CEREBROTEC may by notice request GENERAL to take steps to protect the PATENT RIGHT. GENERAL shall notify CEREBROTEC within three (3) months of the receipt of such notice whether GENERAL intends to prosecute the alleged infringement. If GENERAL notifies CEREBROTEC that it intends to so prosecute, GENERAL shall, within three (3) months of its notice to CEREBROTEC either (i) cause infringement to terminate or (ii) initiate legal proceedings against the infringer. In the event GENERAL notifies CEREBROTEC that GENERAL does not intend to prosecute said infringement CEREBROTEC may, upon notice to GENERAL, initiate legal proceedings against the infringer at CEREBROTEC's expense and in GENERAL's name if so required by law. No settlement, consent judgment or other voluntary final disposition of the * Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. Such portions are marked with a "[*]" in place of the redacted language. Omitted portions are filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. suit which invalidates or restricts the claims of such PATENT RIGHTS and/or JOINT PATENT RIGHTS may be entered into without the consent of GENERAL, which consent shall not be unreasonable withheld. CEREBROTEC shall indemnify GENERAL against any order for payment that may be made against GENERAL in such proceedings. 7.3 In the event one party shall initiate or carry on legal proceedings to enforce any PATENT RIGHT against any alleged infringer, the other party shall fully cooperate with and supply all assistance reasonably requested by the party initiating or carrying on such proceedings. The party which institutes any suit to protect or enforce a PATENT RIGHT shall have sole control of that suit and shall bear the reasonable expenses (excluding legal fees) incurred by said other party in providing such assistance and cooperation as is requested pursuant to this paragraph. The party initiating or carrying on such legal proceedings shall keep the other party informed of the progress of such proceedings and said other party shall be entitled to counsel in such proceedings but at its own expense. Any award paid by third parties as the result of such proceedings (whether by way of settlement or otherwise) shall first be applied to reimbursement of the unreimbursed legal fees and expenses incurred by either party and then the remainder shall be divided between the parties as follows: (a) (i) If the amount is based on lost profits, CEREBROTEC shall receive an amount equal to the damages the court determines CEREBROTEC has suffered as a result of the infringement less the amount of any royalties that would have been due GENERAL on sales of PRODUCT lost by CEREBROTEC as a result of the infringement had CEREBROTEC made such sales; and