Issue Resolution and Escalation Process Sample Clauses

The Issue Resolution and Escalation Process clause establishes a structured method for addressing and resolving disputes or problems that arise during the course of an agreement. Typically, it outlines a step-by-step procedure, starting with informal discussions between relevant parties, followed by formal escalation to higher management or designated representatives if the issue remains unresolved. This clause ensures that conflicts are managed efficiently and systematically, minimizing disruption to ongoing operations and providing a clear path to resolution if initial attempts fail.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 2 times
Issue Resolution and Escalation Process. If any disagreement of any kind or nature whatsoever arises between Flextronics and Nortel Networks with respect to this Agreement, in particular with respect to Product quality or security of supply, Flextronics and Nortel Networks shall first attempt to resolve the disagreement informally. If the Parties are unable to so resolve the disagreement, either Party may invoke the Issue Resolution Process, set out in Exhibit 5. If the Parties are unable to resolve the disagreement through the Issue Resolution Process, either Party may invoke the Escalation Process, set out in Exhibit 5. Flextronics and Nortel Networks shall use reasonable efforts and shall conduct discussions in good faith to resolve all disagreements.
Issue Resolution and Escalation Process. If any disagreement of any kind or nature whatsoever arises between Flextronics and Nortel Networks with respect to this Agreement, Flextronics and Nortel Networks shall first attempt to resolve the disagreement informally. If the Parties are unable to so resolve the disagreement, either Party may invoke the Issue Resolution and Escalation Process, set out in Exhibit “7”. Flextronics and Nortel Networks shall use reasonable efforts and shall conduct discussions in good faith to resolve all disagreements.
Issue Resolution and Escalation Process. (a) The Customer agrees to reasonably cooperate and work closely with the Vendor to either: (i) reproduce errors within the Vendor’s environment; or (ii) demonstrate the occurrence of errors within the Customer’s environment. The Customer also agrees to reasonably cooperate and work closely with the Vendor to conduct diagnostic or troubleshooting measures as reasonably requested by the Vendor.
Issue Resolution and Escalation Process. In keeping with our Agile implementation methodology, any issues shall be tracked in the shared project status document. Escalation of issues beyond communication between Contractor’s assigned SCE’s and City’s Primary Business Contact are set forth in the Service Level Agreement (SLA). City shall have direct access to Contractor’s Service Team Lead and Executive Director of Professional Services. Contractor shall have direct access to City’s Executive Sponsor.

Related to Issue Resolution and Escalation Process

  • Dispute Resolution and Governing Law 14.1 Any dispute, controversy, disagreement or claim of any kind whatsoever arising out of or in connection with or relating to this Agreement or the breach, termination or invalidity hereof (the “Dispute”), shall be submitted to final and binding arbitration at the request of any of the disputing Parties upon written notice to that effect to the other Parties. In the event of such arbitration: 14.1.1 the arbitration shall be through arbitration administered by the Singapore International Arbitration Center (“SIAC”) in accordance with the provisions of the arbitration rules of the SIAC, in force at the relevant time (which is deemed to be incorporated into this Agreement by reference); 14.1.2 all proceedings of such arbitration shall be in the English language. The seat of the arbitration shall be Singapore and the venue of the arbitration shall be Mumbai; 14.1.3 the arbitration shall be conducted before a tribunal (“Tribunal”) which consists of 3 (three) arbitrators. The claimant(s) shall nominate one arbitrator in the notice of arbitration. The respondent(s) shall nominate one arbitrator in the response to the notice of arbitration. The two party-nominated arbitrators shall then have twenty (20) days to agree, in consultation with the parties to the arbitration, upon the nomination of a third arbitrator to act as presiding arbitrator of the tribunal, barring which the President of SIAC shall select the third arbitrator (or any arbitrator that claimant(s) or respondent(s) fail to nominate in accordance with the foregoing); 14.1.4 the award rendered by the Tribunal shall, in addition to dealing with the merits of the case, fix the costs of the arbitration (which includes the Tribunal’s fees) and decide which of the parties thereto shall bear such costs or in what proportions such costs shall be borne by such parties; 14.1.5 arbitration awards shall be reasoned awards and shall be final and binding on the disputing Parties; 14.1.6 this arbitration agreement shall be governed by the Laws of Singapore. It is expressly agreed that: (a) provisions of Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (India) will not apply to this arbitration agreement; and