Superior Proposals Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in Section 6.3(b), from the date hereof until the Offer Acceptance Time, solely in response to a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal that did not result from a breach of the obligations set forth in Section 6.3(b), (i) the Company may, directly or indirectly, through one or more of their Representatives (including the Advisor), contact the Person or group of Persons making such Acquisition Proposal solely to clarify any ambiguous terms and conditions thereof so as to determine whether such Acquisition Proposal constitutes, or would reasonably be expected to constitute, a Superior Proposal, and (ii) the Company may, upon a good faith determination by the Company Board (after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel) that the failure to do so would be or would reasonably be expected to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, participate or engage in discussions or negotiations with, furnish any non-public information relating to the Company Group to, or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books, records or other non-public information, or to any personnel, of the Company Group pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement to any Person or its Representatives that has made or delivered to the Company such Acquisition Proposal, and otherwise facilitate such Acquisition Proposal or assist such Person (and its Representatives, prospective debt and equity financing sources and/or their respective Representatives) with such Acquisition Proposal (in each case, if requested by such Person); provided, that, prior to taking any action described in this Section 6.3(c)(ii), the Company Board (or a committee thereof) has determined in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel) that such Acquisition Proposal either constitutes a Superior Proposal or would reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal; provided, however, that (x) the Company will substantially concurrently provide to Parent and its Representatives any non-public information that is provided to any Person or its Representatives given such access in connection with the actions permitted by this Section 6.3(c)(ii) that was not previously made available to Parent and (y) the Company Group shall not provide (and shall not permit any of their respective Representatives to provide) any competitively sensitive non-public information to any Person who is or whose Affiliates are a competitor of the Company Group in connection with the actions permitted by this Section 6.3(c)(ii), except in accordance with customary “clean room” or other similar procedures designed to manage the disclosure of competitively sensitive information.
Request for Proposals A State request inviting proposals for Goods or Services. This Contract shall be governed by the statutes, regulations and procedures of the State of Connecticut, Department of Administrative Services.
Proposed Policies and Procedures Regarding New Online Content and Functionality By February 1, 2017, the Division will submit to OCR for its review and approval proposed policies and procedures (“the Plan for New Content”) to ensure that all new, newly-added, or modified online content and functionality will be accessible to people with disabilities as measured by conformance to the Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility set forth above, except where doing so would impose a fundamental alteration or undue burden. a) When fundamental alteration or undue burden defenses apply, the Plan for New Content will require the Division to provide equally effective alternative access. The Plan for New Content will require the Division, in providing equally effective alternate access, to take any actions that do not result in a fundamental alteration or undue financial and administrative burdens, but nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the same benefits or services as their nondisabled peers. To provide equally effective alternate access, alternatives are not required to produce the identical result or level of achievement for persons with and without disabilities, but must afford persons with disabilities equal opportunity to obtain the same result, to gain the same benefit, or to reach the same level of achievement, in the most integrated setting appropriate to the person’s needs. b) The Plan for New Content must include sufficient quality assurance procedures, backed by adequate personnel and financial resources, for full implementation. This provision also applies to the Division online content and functionality developed by, maintained by, or offered through a third-party vendor or by using open sources. c) Within thirty (30) days of receiving OCR’s approval of the Plan for New Content, the Division will officially adopt and fully implement the amended policies and procedures.
Submitting Investigator An investigator who submitted a genomic dataset to an NIH designated data repository (e.g., dbGaP).