LIST OF TABLES Sample Clauses

LIST OF TABLES. Table 7-1. Shoreline use and modification matrix 35

LIST OF TABLES. Table 1: 2014 Lake Chelan ▇▇▇▇▇ Survey Angler Data 3 Table 2: 2014 Lake Chelan ▇▇▇▇▇ Survey Results 3 Table 3: Cutthroat/Rainbow Trout Redds Observed in Three Lake Chelan Tributaries, 2011 6 Table 4: Snorkel Survey Results for Three Lake Chelan Tributaries, 2011 6 Table 5: Estimated 2013 Lake Chelan Tributary Rainbow Trout Density and Population Abundance 8 Table 6: Estimated 2014 Lake Chelan Tributary Rainbow Trout Density and Population Abundance 8 Table 7: Estimated 2013 Lake Chelan Tributary Cutthroat Trout Density and Population Abundance 9 Table 8: Estimated 2014 Lake Chelan Tributary Cutthroat Trout Density and Population Abundance 9 Table 9: A Comparison of Species Abundance and Composition 1982 vs. 2014 10 Table 10: A Comparison of Species Abundance and Composition 1982 vs 2013. 10 Table 11: A Comparison of Species Abundance and Composition 1982 vs. 2012 10 Table 12: A Comparison of Species Abundance and Composition 1982 vs. 2011 10 Table 13: Number of Greater than Six-Inch Fish Observed and Size Classes within Two Mainstem ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Sites, 2012 – 2014 13 Table 14: 2011 Fish Stocking Plan 21 Table 15: 2011 Actual Fish Stocking 21 Table 16: 2012 Fish Stocking Plan 22 Table 17: 2012 Actual Fish Stocking 22 Table 18: 2013 Fish Stocking Plan 23 Table 19: 2013 Actual Fish Stocking 23 Table 20: 2014 Fish Stocking Plan 24 Table 21: 2014 Actual Fish Stocking 24 Table 22: 2015 Fish Stocking Plan 25 Table 23: USFS Estimated Lake Chelan Tributaries Spawning Monitoring and Evaluation Budget and Schedule 26 Table 24: WDFW Estimated Juvenile Westslope Cutthroat and Rainbow Trout Abundance Budget and Schedule 27 Table 25: NPS Estimated Cutthroat Trout Spawning Abundance and Genetic Budget and Schedule 28 Table 26: NPS Estimated Stehekin River Kokanee Escapement Budget and Schedule 29 Table 27: WDFW Estimated Kokanee ▇▇▇▇▇ Survey Budget and Schedule 30 Table 28: Summary of 2015 LCFP Expenditures 32 Figure 1: 2014 Lake Chelan Catch Compositions 3 Figure 2: 2014 Angler County/State of Origin. 4 Figure 3: Maximum Count of Greater than Six-Inch Trout Observed within Six Mainstem Pool Index Sites, 2011 – 2014. 12 Figure 4: Total Number of Greater than Six-Inch Trout Observed in Eleven-Side Channel Index Sites, 2011 – 2014. 14

LIST OF TABLES. Table Page

LIST OF TABLES. Table 1 Summary of Literature in AVs 2 Table 2 Summary of Literature on Adoption 6 Table 3 Summary of Literature on WTP 8 Table 4 Summary of Literature on Mode Choice 9 Table 5 Summary of Literature on Benefit and Concerns 10 Table 6 Summary of Literature on Perception of Technology and Operations 12 Table 7 Summary of Literature on Travel Demand 14 Table 8 Classification of Studies by Detailed Approach 16 Table 9 PCA result for AT1 (preferences for lifestyle and mobility options) 22 Table 10 PCA result for AT2 (perceived benefits and concerns of shared mobility) 23 Table 11 PCA result for AT3 (reasons toward or against private vehicle ownership) 24 Table 12 PCA result for AT4 (motivations for and desired features of AV) 24 Table 13 Result of Measurement Equations for AV Adoption and WTP 44 Table 14 Result of Structural Equations 45 Table 15 Result of Measurement Equations 50 Table 16 Result of Structural Model 52 Table 17 Results of Factor Analysis for Mode Dependency 56 Table 18 Linear SVM Model Performances 57 Table 19 Linear SVM Model Coefficients 59 Table 20 Mode Choice Model Results for Regular Trips (t-ratios in brackets) 68 Table 21 Mode Choice Model Results for Occasional Trips (t-ratios in brackets) 70 Table 22 Identified Latent Attitude Factors 72 Table 23 Model Results for Transit Users 74 Table 24 Model Results for Car Users 76 Table 25 Summary of Influential Attitudes to Emerging Mobility Options 81 Table 26 Summary of Influential Variables to Emerging Mobility Options 81 Table 27 Potential Model Changes for ACES Considerations 85 Today’s world is deeply influenced by the way new technology evolves. Advances in information and communication technologies have played an important role in how we live and travel and will continue to do so. Rapidly emerging mobile apps have contributed to the quick expansion of car sharing, ridesourcing, and various other on-demand services around the world. Similarly, connected and autonomous vehicle technologies are expected to bring a paradigm shift in how we define mobility. It is essential to incorporate ridesourcing and automated vehicle (AV) considerations into current long-range transportation planning efforts, which usually extends to the next 20 to 30 years. On the other hand, there are a lot of uncertainties with respect to technology development, regulations, and user acceptance that make it challenging to draw a clear picture of how shared mobility and AVs may affect our daily travel and the potential...

LIST OF TABLES. Table 1-1. Table 7.1 from Appendix D of the Skagit Chinook Recovery Plan. Table 1-2. Restoration Projects Identified in the Skagit Chinook Recovery Plan Sorted by the Smolts Produced Per Acre. Table 2-1. Tidegates by Dike or Drainage District and by Priority. Table 2-2. Floodgates by Dike or Drainage District and by Priority. Table 4-1. Drainage Area Calculation for Tidegate Maintenance Habitat Credit. Table 4-2. Habitat Requirements per Tidegate and Tier 1 Floodgates.

LIST OF TABLES. Table 2-1: 2016 Lake Chelan ▇▇▇▇▇ survey angler data (lower lake). 6 Table 2-2: 2016 Lake Chelan ▇▇▇▇▇ survey results (lower lake) 7 Table 2-3: 2016 Lake Chelan ▇▇▇▇▇ survey angler data (upper lake) 8 Table 2-4: 2016 Lake Chelan ▇▇▇▇▇ survey results (upper lake) 9 Table 2-5: 2016 Angler questionnaire results summary 11 Table 2-6: Angler preference for a trophy fishery and the species preferred by those who indicated they were in favor of a trophy fishery 12 Table 2-7: Estimated 2016 Lake Chelan tributary rainbow trout density and population abundance 13 Table 2-8: Estimated 2016 Lake Chelan tributary cutthroat trout density and population abundance 14 Table 2-9: Estimated 2015 Lake Chelan tributary rainbow trout density and population abundance 14 Table 2-10: Estimated 2015 Lake Chelan tributary cutthroat trout density and population abundance 14 Table 2-11: Estimated 2014 Lake Chelan tributary rainbow trout density and population abundance 15 Table 2-12: Estimated 2014 Lake Chelan tributary cutthroat trout density and population abundance 15 Table 2-13: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs. 2013 vs. 2016. ........................................................................................................................................... 16 Table 2-14: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs. 2015. 16 Table 2-15: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs. 2014. 16 Table 2-16: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs 2013. 16 Table 2-17: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs. 2012. 17 Table 2-18: Comparison of species abundance and composition 1982 vs. 2011. 17 Table 2-19: Lake Chelan tributary kokanee escapement estimates, peak counts and peak count dates, 2016. 20 Table 2-20: Amount of side channel habitat assessed, habitat suitable for kokanee spawning and migration, and number of fish sample segments in the Stehekin River expanded kokanee spawning surveys; 2000, 2010 and 2015. 20 Table 3-1: 2014 Fish Stocking Plan. 28 Table 3-2: 2014 Actual Fish Stocking 29 Table 3-3: 2015 Fish Stocking Plan. 29 Table 3-4: 2015 Actual Fish Stocking 30 Table 3-5: 2016 Fish Stocking Plan. 30 Table 3-6: 2016 Actual Fish Stocking 31 Table 3-7: 2017 Fish Stocking Plan. 31 Table 3-8: Estimated USFS budget and schedule for Fish Creek ▇▇▇▇ survey 32 Table 3-9: Estimated WDFW budget and schedule for tributary trout abundance 33 Table 3-10: Estimated 2017 NPS budget and schedule for westslope ...

LIST OF TABLES. Table 2-1: Non-habitat and Spotted Owl Habitat by Type on the Covered Lands Table 2-2: Landowner Ownership by Percentage Within Spotted Owl Circles in the SOSEA’s Table 3-1: Income and Employment by County for Four-County Area Table 4-1: Comparison of Environmental Impacts to Spotted Owls Between Alternatives Table 4-2: Special-Status Wildlife Species Potentially Occurring in the Covered Area Affected by the Proposed Action Alternative Figure 1-1: Applicant’s Land and Adjacent Ownerships Figure 3-1: Covered Lands Greater and Less Than 40 Years of Age Figure 3-2: Covered Lands Greater and Less Than 60 Years of Age Appendix A: Special-Status Plant Species Potentially Occurring in the Covered Area Appendix B: Special-Status Animal Species Potentially Occurring in the Covered Area Applicants SDS Lumber Company LLC and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Lumber Company APE Area of Potential Effect Baseline Includes all commercial forestland that the Applicants could harvest in Washington and Oregon under State Forest Practices Rules. BLC ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Land Company BMP Best Management Practice BP Before Present CFR Code of Federal Regulations Circles Northern Spotted Owl Management Circles DAHP Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation dbh Diameter At Breast Height EA Environmental Assessment Ecology Washington Department of Ecology Elevated Baseline Agreed upon baseline as a result of the SHA. ESA Endangered Species Act FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact Forest Practice Rules Washington Forest Practices Rules FR Federal Register GIS Geographic Information System HCP Habitat Conservation Plan MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NRHP National Register of Historic Places ODFW Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Permit Enhancement of Survival Permit RCW Revised Code of Washington RD Relative Density RMZ Riparian Management Zone SDS SDS Lumber Company LLC SEPA State Environmental Policy Act SHA Safe Harbor Agreement SMA Special Management Area SOSEA Spotted Owl Special Emphasis Area spotted owl Northern Spotted Owl SSA Special Set-Aside Area State State of Washington tpa Trees Per Acre U.S.C. United States Code USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service WAC Washington Administrative Code WDFW Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WDNR Washington Department of Natural Resources WMZ Wetland Management Zone WRIA Water Resource Inventory Area

LIST OF TABLES. Environmental Documents Supporting the Development of NASA Research Park

LIST OF TABLES. Table 1-1. Examples of Typical Protection and Restoration Actions 1-4 Table 1-2. Typical Restoration Phases and Actions 1-5 Table 2-1. ▇▇▇▇▇ County Restoration Goals, Objectives, Actions, and Success Measures 2-4 Table 4-1. Recommendations and Priorities for Protection, Restoration, and Enhancement in the Marine Shorelines of ▇▇▇▇▇ County Based upon Coastal Processes 4-3 Table 4-3. Recommendations and Priorities for Protection, Restoration and Enhancement in South Puget Sound 4-4 Table 5-1. Miles of Shoreline Recommended for Different Strategies to Achieve Sediment Supply, Sediment Transport, and Tidal Flow 5-4 Table 5-2. Restoration Opportunities on Public Shores of Hood Canal 5-6 Table 5-3. Restoration Opportunities on Public Shores of South Puget Sound 5-12 Table 6-1. Restoration Actions for ▇▇▇▇▇ County Lakes 6-5 Table 7-1. Restoration Actions for ▇▇▇▇▇ County Rivers and Streams – WRIA 14a 7-4 Table 7-2. Restoration Actions for ▇▇▇▇▇ County Rivers and Streams – WRIA 15 7-10 Table 7-3. Restoration Actions for ▇▇▇▇▇ County Rivers and Streams – WRIA 16/14b 7-14 Table 7-4. Restoration Actions for ▇▇▇▇▇ County Rivers and Streams – Table 8-1. Potential Restoration Partner Organizations and their Roles in Future Restoration 8-2