Mitigation of Risk Sample Clauses

Mitigation of Risk. The University acknowledges that a student can greatly benefit from the input of a supervisor who has particular experience and expertise in the candidate’s research area, provided that: 1. The proximity of the supervisor’s proposed thesis topic is distinct to that of the supervisor’s enrolled student(s). In other words, there is no likelihood of overlap or crowding out. If there is a lack of delineation then the ▇▇▇▇ of Graduate Studies will ordinarily not authorise the simultaneous supervision. 2. The supervisor’s existing qualifications and research experience are sufficient for the level of supervisory responsibility being sought. In other words, the supervisor must already hold a qualification which is higher than or equal in status to the qualification the student is studying for. Where this is not the case, but the supervisor can demonstrate equivalent research experience, and is active in research and publishing in, or otherwise making original contributions to, a relevant field or discipline, the ▇▇▇▇ of Graduate Studies may consider authorising appointment at the level of co- supervisor. 3. That the other members of the supervisory panel are responsible for monitoring of the demarcation between the two projects. 4. There is acknowledgement of the simultaneous supervision and agreement between all members of the supervisory panel to partake in the arrangement. 5. The Head of School approves the simultaneous supervision and undertakes to monitor this aspect of the candidature.

Mitigation of Risk. 1. Testing and Quality Control: To guarantee the satellite's dependability and longevity, Star Satellites Inc. will carry out extensive testing processes.

Mitigation of Risk. (i) Lender shall promptly notify Borrower of any event of which it has knowledge which will result in, and will use reasonable commercial efforts available to it (and not, in Lender’s sole judgment, otherwise disadvantageous to Lender) to mitigate or avoid, any obligation by Borrower to pay any amount pursuant to Sections 2.8 or 213 (and, if Lender has given notice of any such event and thereafter such event ceases to exist, Lender shall promptly so notify Borrower and Lender). Without limiting the foregoing, Lender will designate a different funding office if such designation will avoid (or reduce the cost to Borrower of) any event described in clause (i) or (ii) above and such designation will not, in Lender’s sole judgment, be otherwise disadvantageous to Lender.

Mitigation of Risk. 17.1 In order to mitigate risks to the shareholder SoJDC will undertake the following activities: Infrastructure Works – no infrastructure works will be procured until detailed planning permission has been received on vacated development sites and detailed financial appraisals support the development of the scheme. Given t h e importance of t h e public infrastructure works, SoJDC will commission and procure the provision of the infrastructure in accordance with SoJ capital project procurement and delivery procedures. Sales – If it is proposed that a specific c o mme r c i a l development is undertaken directly, before committing to construction costs SoJDC will have to secure a sufficient level of legally binding pre-lets to fund the costs of constructing the first phase of a scheme. This will remove part of the risk of a particular commercial development project and will ensure that there will be no financial liabilities relating to a particular commercial development’s construction costs to the SoJDC. For residential developments undertaken directly, SoJDC will, where possible, phase the development so as to limit the exposure and mitigate risk.

Mitigation of Risk. The Village shall manage the Project Area to reduce the risk of forest loss due to deforestation and forest degradation as provided in the Project Plan.

Mitigation of Risk. In response to a risk the Council of any one of the Parties may direct that:

Mitigation of Risk. In response to a risk the Council of any one of the Parties may direct that: A program be established to mitigate the risk within their boundaries. A program be jointly undertaken with one or more of the Parties to mitigate the risk. No action be taken where the Council believes that the cost of mitigation is greater than the potential benefit, the benefit is not achievable, or such other reasons as the Council may deem appropriate.