Movements Sample Clauses

Movements of Employees to exempt positions shall not be classified as promotions, transfers, or demotions, but shall be considered as new appointments and compensation adjustments upon these new appointments shall be as follows:

Movements. 1. All step movement costs under this paragraph shall be included in the costs of collective bargaining and submitted to the respective legislative bodies for approval at the appropriate time. 2. The following definitions shall be applicable to this paragraph:

Movements. Subject to EMERALD providing at least 5 days prior notice, and at the cost of the Warehouser, EMERALD has the right to outturn the Commodity to another EMERALD site or relocate the Commodity within the site if: (a) the site fills (or is expected to fill) during the season harvest; (b) the Outturn Date is exceeded; (c) consolidation of small quantities of Commodities is required (in EMERALD’s reasonable opinion) for the efficiency of the EMERALD system; (d) the volume in the cell in which the Commodity is stored is down to sweeping stage and/or less than 5% capacity; (e) the quality of the Commodity that has been received has potential to contaminate other Warehouser’s or Client’s commodities; or (f) EMERALD determines (in EMERALD’s reasonable opinion) that it is operationally efficient to move the Commodity. And in each case the Warehouser will bear any additional costs or charges that may arise out of the outturn or relocation relative to the site of origin, including, but not limited to, freight differentials.

Movements. Bunge has the right to outturn the Grain to another Bunge Facility or relocate the Grain within the Facility if: (a) the Bunge Facility, or storage bunker or stack, reaches capacity (or is expected to reach capacity) during the season harvest; (b) the Warehouse Expiry is exceeded; (c) consolidation of small quantities of Grain is required (in Bunge’s reasonable opinion) for the efficiency of the Bunge Facility; (d) the volume in the cell/bunker/stack in which the Grain is stored is down to sweeping stage and/or less than 10% capacity; (e) the quality of the Grain that has been received has potential to contaminate other Warehouser’s Grain or Client’s Grain; or (f) Bunge determines that it is operationally efficient to move the Grain. And in each case the Warehouser will bear any additional costs or charges that may arise out of the outturn or relocation relative to the site of origin, including, but not limited to, freight differentials.

Movements. 2 In typical development, MMs gradually disappear during the first decade of life.3 However, in children with unilat- eral cerebral palsy (UCP), MMs are frequently more pronounced and persistent.1,4,5 Studies of these “pathological” MMs have predominantly focused on the underlying mechanisms1,4,6 and their effect on upper limb function.7-11 Two general mechanisms of MMs are typically described. First, the motor cortex of the less affected hemisphere also con- trols the affected hand (AH) by an uncrossed corticospinal tract to 0003-9993/18/$36 - see front matter ª 2018 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.035 the ipsilateral side of the spinal cord. This ipsilateral projection might depend on preserved ipsilateral projections to the AH or a branching of crossed corticospinal fibers.2,12 These “rewiring” profiles are suggested to cause MMs in both, but especially in the AH.6,13-15 Second, there is widespread and bilateral cortical activation that occurs when actively moving the AH, caused by sensorimotor impairments of this hand and thus increased effort required to move. This lack of “interhemispheric inhibition” is proposed to cause MMs in the less AH.6,8,13 MMs occurring in only the less AH are therefore thought to be related to sensori- motor impairments of the AH, whereas MMs in the AH have been proposed to indicate 1 motor cortex controlling both hands. Accordingly, MMs detected in the AH may act as a low-risk clinical biomarker to probe corticospinal tract wiring13 as compared to more invasive and time-consuming neuroimaging methods (eg, transcranial magnetic stimulation, functional mag- netic resonance imaging). If accurate, it would have a significant effect on clinical practice, allowing development of individualized therapy programs on the basis of the child’s rewiring profile.16 However, to date, studies11,17,18 using various assessments for MM detection report conflicting results, challenging its usefulness in probing cortical “rewiring.”‌‌ With respect to the effect of MMs on upper limb function, the results generally point to an association between pronounced MMs and impaired upper limb function,7-9 especially in bimanual tasks. However, findings are also not ubiquitous. Some studies7,9 report correlations between impaired bimanual performance and MMs in both the AH and the less AH, whereas others8,19 report an association only for MMs appearing in the less AH. Other studies10,11 report littl...

Movements of cattle and bison from the MAZ will be monitored in Michigan-licensed livestock auctions on sale days to confirm that the cattle and bison are officially identified, tested, and permitted, as required, and through other methods as necessary to ensure compliance with requirements. Market coverage by MDARD and/or APHIS staff will be based on the likelihood of MAZ animals being sold in each market. The following markets will have routine and continuous coverage on sale days: Northern Michigan Livestock Exchange in Gaylord, and United Producers, Inc in St. Louis and Cass City. Other markets will be monitored as needed to verify compliance with applicable laws.

Movements and transfers of hazardous materiel (fuel, explosives, weapons) and cargo/ways of transportation of any kind, requiring caution, as external cargo delivery, involving air space, territorial and/or intercoastal waters, Italian railways and/or roadways, shall be coordinated with the Italian Commander in order to verify its conformity to Italian legislation.

Movements of goods between the United Kingdom and the Isle of Man will be free of quantitative restrictions and all measures having equivalent effect, except as permitted or required under paragraph 8 of the 1979 Agreement. (1) The Isle of Man Government will apply the Customs Tariff to trade with territories not included in the Customs Union, except as permitted under paragraph 8 of the 1979 Agreement. (2) In the event of change to the Customs Tariff, the Isle of Man Government will take all steps necessary to maintain consistency with the Customs Tariff, and in all cases will ensure that the rate of duty applicable to trade with territories not included in the Customs Union is the rate specified in the Customs Tariff. (3) To the extent that there is any inconsistency between the preceding sub-paragraphs and paragraph 6 of the 1979 Agreement insofar as it relates to customs duty, the preceding sub- paragraphs will prevail. 6. (1) The Isle of Man Government will not impose any import duty or export duty, or any charge having equivalent effect, on movements of goods between the Isle of Man and Jersey or between the Isle of Man and Guernsey.

Movements of FARC-EP members from where they are based to the TLZNs and TLPNs will be coordinated and monitored by the MVM.