New Research Sample Clauses

New Research. (a) During the term of this Agreement, if either Party wishes to pursue a program of activities directed to (i) the research and development of pharmaceutical or biologic products comprising Autologous CTLs or Allogeneic CTLs, or [ * ], in each case Specifically Directed to Targets that are not associated with EBV (“New CTL Products”), or (ii) the research and development of the [ * ] arising from the [ * ] Programs (the “Program [ * ]” as further defined in the License Agreement), (such research and development programs in (i) and (ii), each a “New Research Program”), such Party may propose to the JSC that such New Research Program is included within the scope of the Research Collaboration. (b) If the Parties, through the JSC, agree that a New Research Program should be investigated with a view to inclusion within the Research Collaboration, Institute shall prepare and present a proposal (a “New Research Proposal”) to the JSC for discussion. Any New Research Proposal shall include, at a minimum: (i) the Target(s) for such New CTL Products or Program [ * ], as applicable, (ii) a description of the proposed research and development activities, including an estimated timeline for such development, (iii) a good faith estimated budget for such development activities, (iv) a description of any material know-how, data, results or information in the possession and control of Institute that is necessary for Atara (and the JSC) to determine whether or not to pursue the New Research Program, and (v) a listing of the patent rights (including any such patent rights owned or controlled by any Third Party) that (A) cover or claim such New CTL Products or Program [ * ], or (B) Institute reasonably believes may be necessary or useful for the conduct of the proposed development activities, including in each case the owner or licensor under any Third Party patent rights, and (vi) any other information that Atara or the JSC may request in order to make a decision as to whether or not to progress the New Research Program (the information and materials in (i) through (vi), the “New Research Information Package”). Any such New Research Proposal shall be presented to the JSC no less than thirty (30) days prior to the JSC meeting at which such New Research Proposal is to be considered. (c) The JSC shall discuss any New Research Proposal at the next JSC meeting following the delivery by Institute of the New Research Information Package, and shall determine whether the Parties shou...
View SourceView Similar (3)
New Research. During the Term, the parties anticipate undertaking additional non-clinical research, and the parties acknowledge that either party may assume certain responsibilities, and may conduct certain activities, in connection with such research. The JSC (or a subcommittee designated with responsibility therefore) shall have oversight for the parties’ responsibilities and activities (if any) related to new research, and shall incorporate such research, activities and studies into the Research Plan as appropriate.
View Source
New Research. Global Fluency -­‐ Beyond Structure and Agency A number of local governments have shifted their internal configurations from being structurally administrative-­‐executor with an agency of transaction, to a legislative-­‐activist structure with transformational agency to facilitate these activities and to seek local growth from a global market. This research suggests that this dyadic shift may be the quintessential formula that enables globally fluent cities to become economically stronger and more independent. Three questions are considered that relate to the role of local elected officials, as transformational leaders within a legislative-­‐activist structure, who are seeking to position their areas as globally fluent and economically more independent and stable. What are they doing? A number of local elected officials have taken advantage of the legislative-­‐activist structure to access the global stage to engage in various activities, two of which are examined here. In one instance, the local elected officials act as individuals on the global stage, empowered to act on behalf of their area. In the second instance, they act as part of a global network of cities or organisations that seek a collective benefit for local areas while acting outside central government. Why are they doing this? Particularly at the local level, there are varying reasons for becoming a local councillor, which many would consider as the ultimate ‘bottom of the political barrel’ with little monetary and personal rewards. What then might motivate a local councillor to take a (big) step further and seek to influence and change an embedded system of government processes by connecting the local government to another level of global complexity? The responses are as varied and individual as politicians are themselves. Who are they doing this for? Polling numbers from both the US and UK indicate that trust in central government is at an all-­‐time low while trust in local government remains steady (Gallup, 2012, 2013; Ipsos ▇▇▇▇, 2012; LGA 2012). The question of whom a local elected official represents when they take to the global stage is reflective of the trust issue. They could be reacting to interest from multiple stakeholders: pressure emanating from local constituents, the business community, or party allegiances; or they may be driven by a personal idealistic interest in representing innovation and ideas at a level outside or above geographic borders. In pursuing these questions,...
View Source
New Research. There is some discussion about the effectiveness of perpetrator schemes in preventing reoffending in domestic violence. Although bids are invited, we will commission research into the effectiveness of perpetrator schemes in general. The same approach will be taken to diversionary schemes. Bids are invited but research into effectiveness will be carried out in 2014/15.
View Source

Related to New Research

  • Research Primary Investigator as part of a multi-site study (25 points) • Co-Investigator as part of a multi-site study (20 points) • Primary Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (15 points) • Co-Investigator of a facility/unit based research study (10 points) • Develops a unit specific research proposal (5 points) • Conducts a literature review as part of a research study (5 points)

  • Manufacturing Technology Transfer Except as provided in Section 4.3(f)(iii)(1) and Section 6.10, with respect to any Collaboration Product (or LGC Reserved Product, if applicable) for which LGC (or its Affiliate) performed CMC Development or CMC Manufacturing, if (a) Cue does not elect for LGC to perform CMC Step 2, CMC Step 3, or CMC Step 4 (or with respect to LGC Reserved Products, upon completion of CMC Step 1), or (b) upon failure of the Parties to reach agreement with respect to a Clinical Supply Agreement or a Commercial Supply Agreement or (c) [***] under this Agreement and does not cure such breach within [***] days (provided, that if such breach is not reasonably capable of cure within such [***] day period, then such cure period shall be automatically extended for an additional [***] day period as long as LGC continues to use diligent efforts to cure such breach in accordance with a reasonable cure plan and if such breach is not reasonably capable of cure within such combined [***] day period, then Cue shall reasonably consider consenting to any extension of such cure period as long as LGC continues to use diligent efforts to cure such breach in accordance with a reasonable cure plan), as applicable, then, in each case upon the written request of Cue, LGC shall use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to make a technology transfer to an Approved CMO the Manufacturing processes (including materials and such other information) but solely as is necessary to enable the Manufacture of such Collaboration Product (including the Collaboration Compound therein) (or LGC Reserved Product, including the LGC Reserved Compound therein, if applicable) by such Approved CMO to comparable biochemical structure, quality and purity as that Manufactured by LGC or its Affiliate or CMO, provided that neither Cue, LGC or any Third Party shall perform such a technology transfer to any CMO [***] without LGC’s consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed if LGC has approved the CMO to manufacture Collaboration Products (or LGC Reserved Products, if applicable). LGC shall conduct such technology transfer as soon as reasonably practicable after receiving such written notice, using good faith efforts to support supply needed to achieve timelines in the Cue Territory Development Plan (or Cue’s development plan for LGC Reserved Products, if applicable) or Cue Territory Commercialization Plan, as applicable. LGC shall conduct the first technology transfer for each Collaboration Product (or LGC Reserved Products, if applicable) [***] (provided that [***]) for a period of up to [***] months from the date Cue or its designee has provided notice it is ready to receive the technology transfer, provided, that such [***] month period [***]. After the expiration of the initial such [***] month period for a Collaboration Product (or LGC Reserved Products, if applicable), if required to complete the technology transfer to enable the Manufacture of such Collaboration Product (including the Collaboration Compound therein) (or LGC Reserved Product, including the LGC Reserved Compound therein, if applicable) by such Approved CMO to comparable biochemical structure, quality and purity as that Manufactured by LGC, LGC shall continue to provide support to Cue for up to an additional [***] period for up to [***] hours at the FTE Rate and thereafter at [***]. Thereafter, LGC will also provide [***] for such Collaboration Product (or LGC Reserved Products, if applicable). Neither Cue nor its Affiliates or Cue Collaborators shall reverse engineer any materials provided hereunder by LGC. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, LGC’s CMC information may only be shared with an Approved CMO.

  • Research Use The Requester agrees that if access is approved, (1) the PI named in the DAR and (2) those named in the “Senior/Key Person Profile” section of the DAR, including the Information Technology Director and any trainee, employee, or contractor1 working on the proposed research project under the direct oversight of these individuals, shall become Approved Users of the requested dataset(s). Research use will occur solely in connection with the approved research project described in the DAR, which includes a 1-2 paragraph description of the proposed research (i.e., a Research Use Statement). Investigators interested in using Cloud Computing for data storage and analysis must request permission to use Cloud Computing in the DAR and identify the Cloud Service Provider (CSP) or providers and/or Private Cloud System (PCS) that they propose to use. They must also submit a Cloud Computing Use Statement as part of the DAR that describes the type of service and how it will be used to carry out the proposed research as described in the Research Use Statement. If the Approved Users plan to collaborate with investigators outside the Requester, the investigators at each external site must submit an independent DAR using the same project title and Research Use Statement, and if using the cloud, Cloud Computing Use Statement. New uses of these data outside those described in the DAR will require submission of a new DAR; modifications to the research project will require submission of an amendment to this application (e.g., adding or deleting Requester Collaborators from the Requester, adding datasets to an approved project). Access to the requested dataset(s) is granted for a period of one (1) year, with the option to renew access or close-out a project at the end of that year. Submitting Investigator(s), or their collaborators, who provided the data or samples used to generate controlled-access datasets subject to the NIH GDS Policy and who have Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and who meet any other study specific terms of access, are exempt from the limitation on the scope of the research use as defined in the DAR.

  • Collaboration 31.1 If the Buyer has specified in the Order Form that it requires the Supplier to enter into a Collaboration Agreement, the Supplier must give the Buyer an executed Collaboration Agreement before the Start date. 31.2 In addition to any obligations under the Collaboration Agreement, the Supplier must: 31.2.1 work proactively and in good faith with each of the Buyer’s contractors 31.2.2 co-operate and share information with the Buyer’s contractors to enable the efficient operation of the Buyer’s ICT services and G-Cloud Services

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics