Objective of the Scenario Sample Clauses

The 'Objective of the Scenario' clause defines the main purpose and intended outcomes of a particular scenario within an agreement or document. It typically outlines the goals, context, and key parameters that guide the actions or decisions to be taken under the scenario, such as specifying the desired results or the conditions to be achieved. By clearly stating these objectives, the clause ensures that all parties have a shared understanding of the scenario's aims, reducing ambiguity and aligning expectations.
Objective of the Scenario. ‌ The main objective of this scenario is to demonstrate the ability to assemble the outer ring by mounting the pre-assembly onto the inner ring.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Objective of the Scenario. The main objective of this scenario is to demonstrate the system capability to assemble one of the 6 pre-assembly of the telescope under microgravity conditions.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Objective of the Scenario. ‌ The main objective of this scenario is to demonstrate the system capability to assemble the inner ring of the telescope under microgravity conditions.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Objective of the Scenario. This scenario addresses several objectives. It demonstrates the simulator can be used to model realistic sensors and actuators. It also validates that core components are able to interface seamlessly with real and simulated hardware. Finally, it shows that the simulator allows the modelling of component flexibility and related disturbances.
View Source
Objective of the Scenario. The main objective of this scenario is to validate the dISAS simulation tools that will be used for development, debugging and validation.
View Source
Objective of the Scenario. The objective of this scenario is to verify the RAS functionalities to ensure that it is ready to perform scenarios 2 and 3
View Source
Objective of the Scenario. ‌ This scenario addresses the second main objective of the dPAMT demonstrator: it verifies the assembly of mirror tiles using an external measurement device, and commands suitable motions of the optical surfaces in the Segmented Mirror Tiles (dSMT) to correct the alignment errors induced by the assembly process.
View Source
Objective of the Scenario. The objective of this scenario is to validate the functioning of all the dISAS components into an integrated demonstration.
View Source

Related to Objective of the Scenario

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services 1. Quality- and Cost-based Selection. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 2 below, consultants’ services shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality and Cost-based Selection.

  • Other Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services The following table specifies the methods of procurement, other than Quality and Cost-based Selection, which may be used for consultants’ services. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under which such methods may be used. (a) Quality-based Selection (b) Selection under a Fixed Budget

  • Performance Factors (a) Each party will notify the other party of the existence of a Performance Factor, as soon as reasonably possible after the party becomes aware of the Performance Factor. The Notice will: describe the Performance Factor and its actual or anticipated impact; include a description of any action the party is undertaking, or plans to undertake, to remedy or mitigate the Performance Factor; indicate whether the party is requesting a meeting to discuss the Performance Factor; and address any other issue or matter the party wishes to raise with the other party. (b) The recipient party will provide a written acknowledgment of receipt of the Notice within 7 Days of the date on which the Notice was received (“Date of the Notice”). (c) Where a meeting has been requested under paragraph 7.2(a)(3), the parties agree to meet and discuss the Performance Factors within 14 Days of the Date of the Notice, in accordance with the provisions of section 7.3.

  • Communicable Diseases Upon recommendation of the Medical Officer of Health, all employees shall be required, on an annual basis to be vaccinated and or to take antiviral medication for influenza. If the costs of such medication are not covered by some other sources, the Employer will pay the cost for such medication. If the employee fails to take the required medication, she may be placed on an unpaid leave of absence during any influenza outbreak in the home until such time as the employee has been cleared by the public health or the employer to return to the work environment. The only exception to this would be employees for whom taking the medication will result in the employee being physically ill to the extent that she cannot attend work. Upon written direction from the employee’s physician of such medical condition in consultation with the Employer’s physician, (if requested), the employee will be permitted to access their sick bank, if any, during any outbreak period. If there is a dispute between the physicians, the employee will be placed on unpaid leave. If the employee gets sick as a reaction to the drug and applies for WSIB the Employer will not oppose the application. If an employee is pregnant and her physician believes the pregnancy could be in jeopardy as a result of the influenza inoculation and/or the antiviral medication she shall be eligible for sick leave in circumstances where she is not allowed to attend at work as a result of an outbreak.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.