Offeror Exceptions to Terms and Conditions Sample Clauses
The 'Offeror Exceptions to Terms and Conditions' clause allows the party making an offer (the offeror) to specify any deviations or objections they have to the standard terms and conditions presented in a contract or solicitation. In practice, this clause requires the offeror to clearly list and justify any exceptions they wish to take, such as changes to payment terms, delivery schedules, or liability provisions. Its core function is to ensure transparency and facilitate negotiation by formally documenting any requested changes, thereby preventing misunderstandings and helping both parties reach a mutually acceptable agreement.
Offeror Exceptions to Terms and Conditions. The Lead State discourages exceptions to contract terms and conditions in the RFP, attached Participating Entity terms and conditions (if any), and the NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions. Exceptions may cause a proposal to be rejected as nonresponsive when, in the sole judgment of the Lead State (and its sourcing team), the proposal appears to be conditioned on the exception or correction of what is deemed to be a deficiency or unacceptable exception and would require a substantial proposal rewrite to correct. Offerors should identify or seek to clarify any problems with contract language or any other document contained within this RFP through their written inquiries about the RFP using the process in Section 2.1. Moreover, Offerors are cautioned that award may be made on receipt of initial proposals without clarification or an opportunity for discussion, and the nature of exceptions would be evaluated. Further, the nature of exceptions will be considered in the competitive range determination if one is conducted. In the sole discretion of the Lead State, exceptions may be evaluated to determine: the extent to which the alternative language or approach poses unreasonable, additional risk to the state; is judged to inhibit achieving the objectives of the RFP; or whose ambiguity makes evaluation difficult and a fair resolution (available to all Offerors) impractical given the timeframe for the RFP. Exceptions may result in a Proposal being rejected as nonresponsive and the Lead State is under no obligation to consider exceptions.
Offeror Exceptions to Terms and Conditions.
3.11.1 The Lead State discourages exceptions to the terms and conditions in the RFP, including the exhibits and attachments. Exceptions may cause a Proposal to be rejected as non-responsive when, in the sole judgment of the Lead State (and its sourcing team); the Proposal appears to be conditioned on exceptions or correction and would require a substantial Proposal rewrite to correct. In addition, exceptions to the mandatory requirements are not permitted.
3.11.2 In the sole discretion of the Lead State, exceptions may be evaluated to determine: the extent to which the alternative language or approach poses unreasonable, additional risk to the Lead State; is judged to inhibit achieving the objectives of the RFP; or whose ambiguity makes Evaluation difficult and a fair resolution (available to all Offerors) impractical given the time- frame for the RFP.
3.11.3 Offerors should identify or seek to clarify any problems with contract language or any other document contained within this RFP through their written inquiries about the RFP using the process that is outlined in Subsection 3.2.
Offeror Exceptions to Terms and Conditions. Offerors should identify or seek to clarify any problems with contract language or any other document contained within this RFP through their written inquiries about the RFP using the process in Section 2.1. Exceptions and/or additions to Attachment A: NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreement Terms and Conditions are strongly discouraged. However, any requested exceptions and/or additions to terms and conditions must be submitted as an answer to the corresponding question in the Question Section of this solicitation. Exceptions and/or additions submitted after the date and time for receipt of proposals will not be considered. Offerors may not submit requests for exceptions and/or additions by reference to a vendor's website or URL. URLs provided with a proposal may result in that proposal being rejected as non-responsive. Offerors may submit questions during the Question and Answer period regarding the Standard Terms and Conditions. The Lead State (and its sourcing team) may refuse to negotiate exceptions and/or additions that are determined to be excessive; that are inconsistent with similar contracts of the procurement unit; to warranties, insurance, or indemnification provisions that are necessary to protect the procurement unit after consultation with the applicable legal counsel; where the solicitation specifically prohibits exceptions and/or additions; or that are not in the best interest NASPO and participating states. In a multiple award, the State reserves the right to negotiate exceptions and/or additions to terms and conditions in a manner resulting in expeditious resolutions. This process may include beginning negotiations with the Offeror having the least amount of exceptions and/or additions and concluding with the Offeror submitting the greatest number of exceptions and/or additions. Contracts may be executed and become effective as negotiations are completed. For any proposed change(s), Offeror must provide the NASPO’s Attachment A: Terms and Conditions for this solicitation in Microsoft Word format with redline edits. Additional terms or documents must be submitted in separate Microsoft Word documents. Offeror must also provide the name, contact information, and access to the person(s) that will be directly involved in legal negotiations. Any mandatory required acceptance of an Offeror’s terms and conditions may result in the proposal being determined to be non-responsive. An award resulting from this RFP is subject to successful contract terms a...
Offeror Exceptions to Terms and Conditions. Participating Entity Offerors are cautioned that award may be made on receipt of initial proposals without clarification or an opportunity for discussion, and the nature of exceptions would be evaluated. Further, the nature of exceptions will be considered in the competitive range determination if one is conducted. Exceptions will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the alternative language or approach poses unreasonable, additional risk to the state, is judged to inhibit achieving the objectives of the RFP, or whose ambiguity makes evaluation difficult and a fair resolution (available to all offerors) impractical given the timeframe for the RFP.