Order of Interpretation Clause Samples
The Order of Interpretation clause establishes the hierarchy or priority of documents and provisions within a contract in the event of inconsistencies or conflicts. Typically, it specifies which document or section will prevail if there is a contradiction, such as giving precedence to the main agreement over appendices or schedules. This clause ensures clarity and predictability by providing a clear method for resolving ambiguities, thereby reducing the risk of disputes over which contractual terms should govern.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 42 times
Order of Interpretation. In the event of any inconsistencies between the terms and conditions of the body of this Agreement and the Schedules, the provision of the body of this Agreement shall prevail over the terms of any Schedule.
Order of Interpretation. If this contract conflicts with other documents, the conflict will be resolved in the following order: this contract and signed amendments, the DHS procurement, the attachments to this contract.
Order of Interpretation. Each Schedule is automatically deemed to include all the terms and conditions of the Subscription Agreement and these Terms; provided that whenever the provisions of a Schedule expressly conflict with the Subscription Agreement or these Terms, the agreements should be interpreted in the following order: (a) the conflicting provisions of the Schedule control and take precedence over the conflicting provisions of the Subscription Agreement and these Terms, then (b) the conflicting provisions of the Subscription Agreement shall take precedence over the conflicting provisions of these Terms.
Order of Interpretation. 17.1 If the Agreement document and its appendices contradict each other, the Agreement document shall apply primarily, followed by the appendices in numerical order.
Order of Interpretation. If there is any inconsistency between the documents forming part of or contemplated by the entire agreement between the parties, then the provisions should be read in order of the following priority and interpreted as follows:
a. the provisions of the Training Agreement prevail to the extent of the inconsistency
b. if the inconsistency is between the terms and conditions and the application form, the provisions of the terms and conditions will prevail to the extent of the inconsistency.
Order of Interpretation. In the event of an inconsistency in the terms of this Agreement and the Exhibits, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: (a) this Agreement; (b) the Exhibits.
Order of Interpretation. To the greatest extent possible, the main body of this Agreement and each of its attached Schedules shall be construed consistently, so as to complement each other. All rights, responsibilities and remedies established in such documents are cumulative. Any conflict or inconsistency between any provision of the main body of this Agreement and any provision of any of its Schedules shall be resolved by giving priority to such documents in the following descending order: (i) the main body of this Agreement, not including its Schedules; (ii) Schedule 10 (Governing Law and Dispute Resolution Process); (iii) the Bailment Agreement (if the Parties entered into a Bailment Agreement); (iv) the Joint Development Terms and Conditions; (v) the Social Compliance Requirements; (vi) the Procedures Manual; (vii) the Confidentiality Agreement; (viii) the Product Specifications; and (ix) the content of all other Schedules to the Agreement.
Order of Interpretation. To the extent of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of the City of Ocala Ordinances cited herein first, and the Agreement second shall control.
Order of Interpretation. The provisions set forth in the Framework Agreement shall have priority over the provisions of this Agreement, unless the latter contains more specific provisions with regard to their area of application.
Order of Interpretation. Each Schedule is automatically deemed to include all the terms and conditions of the Poof Dispensary Agreement and these Terms; provided that whenever the provisions of a Schedule expressly conflict with the Poof Dispensary Agreement or these Terms, the agreements should be interpreted in the following order: (a) the conflicting provisions of the Schedule (except for Schedule B – Service Level Agreement) control and take precedence over the conflicting provisions of the Poof Dispensary Agreement and these Terms, then (b) the conflicting provisions of the Poof Dispensary Agreement shall take precedence over the conflicting provisions of these Terms. For clarity, the provisions of the Poof Dispensary Agreement shall take precedence over the provisions of Schedule B – Service Level Agreement.