Other Indicators. The M&E Plan will contain the Indicators listed in the following tables. Objective Level Increased responsiveness of Local Government Units (LGUs) to community needs Use of inclusive Community Driven Development (CDD) processes by local governments Percentage of project municipal local government units (MLGUs) that have meetings with community representatives to solicit inputs to municipal development plans and / or percentage of barangays that reflect community priorities in their barangay development plans TBD 80% LGU provision of funds for O&M Percentage of MLGUs that provide funding support for KALAHI-CIDSS sub-project O&M 0% 80% LGU application of CDD practices to non-KALAHI- CIDSS activities Number of project MLGUs that pass ordinances / resolutions adopting CDD principles ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Increased community engagement in development activities Participation of women in local government Number of women representatives in targeted areas ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Community engagement in development activities Percentage of MCC-funded KALAHI-CIDSS-developed community organizations that have satisfactory organizational performance ratings 0% 80% Percentage of communities that attract additional funding for development activities after the KALAHI-CIDSS Project is completed 0% 30% Increased value of sub-project benefits6 Aggregate value of benefits of sub-projects. (Varies, please see below) Outcome Level Increased LGU engagement LGU provision of funds Percentage of LGUs that provide at least 80% of Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) funding requirements 0% 90% 4 As the municipalities are due to be randomly selected, baseline figures are not yet known. 5 These figures are indicative. 6 The baseline levels for these indicators will be determined by the initial round of data collection in the selected municipalities. The targets will be informed by this information and by the results of the endline data collection in KC1 areas. Table 1: M&E Indicators for KALAHI-CIDSS Project LGU provision of technical support Percentage of LGUs that provide at least 80% of MOA technical support requirements 0% 90% Increased community engagement Barangay assembly participation Percentage of barangay assemblies with 80% of community households represented TBD 80% Marginalized group participation Percentage of barangay assemblies with 65% of youth, women, indigenous people and poorest households represented TBD 80% Increased value of sub-project benefits7 Time savings ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Labor force participation (by age and gender) ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ School enrollment ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Number of beneficiary farming households ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Yield of paddy rice ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Water consumption (by use) ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Use of barangay health facilities ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Post-harvest losses ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ Sub-projects delivered Sub-projects completed Number of completed sub- projects (by type) 0 3400 Sub-projects sustained Sub-projects sustained Percentage of sub-projects that pass functionality audits or receive satisfactory or higher ratings of sustainability 0% 80% 7 The precise indicators, definitions, baseline level and final targets will be determined by the initial round of data collection in the selected control and treatment municipalities. The targets will be informed by this information and by the results of the endline data collection in KC1 areas. Objective Level Net incomes of road users increased Costs to road users Aggregate value of time savings (in 2009US$m)8 ▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇- Borongan-Guiuan NA 5.2 9.5 Change in aggregate vehicle operating cost (in 2009US$m)9 ▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇- Borongan-Guiuan NA 9.4 16.5
Appears in 3 contracts
Sources: Millennium Challenge Compact, Millennium Challenge Compact, Millennium Challenge Compact